Shocker55 retweetledi
Shocker55
11.1K posts

Shocker55 retweetledi

@JennaXCrypto @XPUNKNFTs Is the future bright for Xpunks? And nice!!
English

@Bitforcoinz Rich hold people don’t want you to be rich and also don’t want to say xrp
English

@ShamsCharania Bro wtf are these injuries nah they doing weird shit to these players
English

$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH
Filed: March 9, 2026 — 10:03 PM (very late filing) ⏰
Case: In re Meta Materials Inc., Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court – District of Nevada
Document: Response by Citadel, Virtu, and Anson opposing the trustee’s supplemental brief.
⚠️ Not legal advice — just a plain-English summary.
————————————————
📄 What This Filing Is (Attached)
Citadel Securities, Virtu Financial, and Anson Funds filed a joint response asking the court to quash the Rule 2004 subpoenas issued by the bankruptcy trustee.
Those subpoenas seek trading records related to potential market manipulation involving Meta Materials stock.
Their core argument:
👉 The trustee has not proven the company itself was harmed, so discovery should stop.
⸻
⚖️ Their Three Main Arguments
1️⃣ No Standing
They argue the trustee must show:
•Meta sold its own shares
•At prices affected by manipulation
They claim the trustee has not identified specific days or sales where this occurred.
⸻
2️⃣ Most Transactions Were Not Market Sales
They argue many transactions listed by the trustee cannot be tied to manipulation, including:
•Debt conversions
•The MMTLP dividend (no proceeds to the company)
•Share payments in acquisitions
•Warrant repricing events
Their point: these were contractual or private transactions, not open market trades.
⸻
3️⃣ No “Good Cause” for Subpoenas
They argue:
•The trustee already has data from other sources
•These firms do not possess unique information
Therefore the subpoenas should be quashed entirely.
⸻
📊 Key Argument About Manipulation
They claim spoofing or manipulation only affects prices briefly, meaning the trustee must show:
•Specific manipulation
•On the same day Meta sold shares
They argue the trustee has not done this yet.
⸻
🧾 Their Attempt to Remove TRCH and MMTLP
They also argue:
• TRCH: Claims may not transfer to Meta after the merger
• MMTLP: Was a dividend, not a stock sale
Their point: these cannot create damages for the bankruptcy estate.
⸻
🔎 Subtle Tells in the Filing
1️⃣ They Admit One Transaction Type Could Matter
They acknowledge the ATM (at-the-market) stock sales involved real market pricing.
That leaves a door open if the trustee links manipulation to those sales.
⸻
2️⃣ They Focus on Timing Instead of Denying Manipulation
The argument is mostly:
“You didn’t prove manipulation affected specific sales.”
They do not actually deny manipulation occurred.
⸻
3️⃣ They Spend Significant Space on Rule 2004 Limits
When defendants focus heavily on limiting discovery, it often signals concern about what discovery might reveal.
Rule 2004 is intentionally broad.
⸻
4️⃣ They Attack the Evidence — Not the Investigation
They argue the trustee’s evidence is incomplete after three rounds of briefing.
That suggests the real battle is over whether discovery should proceed, not whether manipulation occurred.
⸻
🧭 Big Picture
This filing is essentially a pre-discovery defense strategy. ⬅️
They are trying to stop the investigation by arguing:
• No standing
• No causal connection
• No good cause for subpoenas
If the judge disagrees on any one of those points, the Rule 2004 subpoenas likely move forward. 🦋
dropbox.com/scl/fi/jp91gqq…
dropbox.com/scl/fi/87idc60…
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

🚨NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS FILES TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIM IN HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AGAINST JEFF DAVIES @EnergyCredit1.
LINK TO PETITION AND EXHIBITS BELOW.
TRCH MMTLP MMAT @nbhydrocarbons
drive.google.com/file/d/1oNEpaP…
Guess Who@RedHeelzz
Would ya look at that…. 🚨Nextbridge Hydrocarbons files Civil Tortious Interference case against Jeffrey Davies.🚨 What’s the saying? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes? Looks like it’s GAME ON, Mr. Davies. 🔥🔥🔥 #FAFO $MMTLP $MMAT #MMTLParmy #Relentless #gsc.tab=0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/s…
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

For years, people said: “Blockchain games won’t exist on PlayStation, Xbox, or Steam.”
Not because of technical limits,
but because of control.
GUNZ established itself on these platforms
and did more than just launch a game.
It set a precedent:
> economies are taking shape within mainstream ecosystems
> platforms are working through how ownership fits within their rules
> this model is moving closer to viability at scale
This is what “first” looks like.
And first is never easy.
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

How long till we see some kind of money?
Resolution
Nextbridge dividend
Settlement
Rico
Courts
Etc?
🙏
Just asking
Thank you
#mmtlp
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

@JimR65_ @Maximus711474 @john40706 @KarmaCollects Well then be prepared to get fucked with cash in lieu. You had plenty of time to transfer your shares and you still fought the obvious.
English

@big_business_ wtf is going on is this a podcast this was an off the show conversation
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

@_michael513 Why is Uzi name not the biggest he’s bigger than evey artist on ther combined
English
Shocker55 retweetledi

I love carti but man this was the shit uzi was making during that era it's genuinely disrespectful to even compare
nat@cuhslatt
in a heated debate rn, which would’ve been the better album whole lotta red v1 or eternal atake v1?
English
Shocker55 retweetledi













