Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)

7.9K posts

Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) banner
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)

Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)

@jrfowler1

Dad, CPA, LSU & UNO alum, Saints & Pelicans fan - I’m a CPA, but NOT YOUR CPA. All tweets are NOT tax advice. I will NEVER solicit services or money in DMs.

Metairie, LA Katılım Haziran 2013
806 Takip Edilen877 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)@jrfowler1·
To @SECGov and @FINRA: Work with Next Bridge Hydrocarbons. Be the heroes! Fix the problem! Imagine how favorable history will view your legacy if you did. It would be the story of the century! The headline will read #SECsavesMMTLP! $MMTLP #MMTLP 🧵(1/7)
English
27
433
496
59.3K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
NFL Nerd
NFL Nerd@NerdingonNFL·
IN ALL ITS GLORY… Our completed Schedule Grid for 2026
NFL Nerd tweet media
English
73
224
1.8K
174.1K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)
@Shockercrypto @oyehabla @808CG1 @IRONAPE_MMTLP This round is for paying off debt, buying back preferred shares & operating capital. No dividends in this round. That's per the document. As for subsequent rounds (if any), the document would have to explicitly state dividends to common shareholders.
English
1
0
3
73
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA)
Well, I’m not surprised by the move since we are so close to the deadline. IMO, there should be ZERO excuses to make it effective now. Kudos to McCabe, the audit committee, M&K CPAs & Nextbridge’s other outside counsel to getting this done so quickly. Your move, SEC!
GIF
CPLANT@TheTrndisuFrnd

You are not going to believe it but the A Holes at the SEC wanted the latest financials included. So some good people worked all weekend to get it done. So now the SEC can Suck on this capedge.com/filing/1936756…

English
3
94
189
4.2K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Rare DD
Rare DD@RareDealsHere·
Premarket trading in MMTLP on 12/8/22. Why would the price be down 15% before household investors had the ability to buy/sell? @FINRA @SECGov @SECPaulSAtkins
Rare DD@RareDealsHere

December 8th, $MMTLP PREMARKET Just over 7K volume caused a 15% drop. Based on @FINRA rule 11893, these were erroneous transactions (there shouldn't be OTC trading activity during premarket) that should've been investigated and reversed. Will this be addressed in the @SECGov's investigation of MMTLP? #MMTLPsetaDATE

English
2
83
140
3.3K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
JunkSavvy
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy·
🚨NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS FILES PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT v9 TO THEIR S-1 OFFERING. "Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. is filing this pre-effective amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-269366) (the “Amendment No. 9”) as an exhibit only filing. Accordingly, this Amendment No. 9 contains the facing page, this explanatory note, Item 16 of Part II of the Registration Statement, and the signature page. The remainder of the Registration Statement is unchanged and therefore been omitted." sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archiv…
JunkSavvy tweet media
English
8
180
344
24.1K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Rare DD
Rare DD@RareDealsHere·
The closest thing to a MMTLP Caveat Emptor timestamp... 3:01 PM 08 Dec 22 (source X) I also included a screenshot in case the post gets deleted. Context: After about 14 months of trading, OTC Markets gave MMTLP the Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware) designation. This was the same day FINRA posted their second revised MMTLP Corporate Action on 12/8/22. What's one of the reasons for the Caveat Emptor designation according to the OTC notice? "...potential confusion amongst market participants regarding dates and entitlements for the Share Exchange published by FINRA on December 6, 2022 and subsequently revised on December 8, 2022." Even OTC Markets blamed the Corporate Actions posted on 12/6 & 12/8! But who modified the language concerning the dates and entitlements in the MMTLP Corporate Actions? FINRA!!! So it was awfully strange when Jim Cramer (long after MMTLP no longer traded) attempted to blame MMTLP investors for not having an understanding of Caveat Emptor. @SECEnfDirector
Rare DD tweet mediaRare DD tweet media
OTC Markets Group@OTCMarkets

Today’s #CaveatEmptor List | $MMTLP | For info: bit.ly/caveatemptors | Our policy: bit.ly/CEpolicy | 12/8

English
12
413
359
45K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Rare DD
Rare DD@RareDealsHere·
What I find interesting is that a Hairdresser (no offense to Hairdressers), knows more about market mechanics than brokerages like TD Ameritrade / @CharlesSchwab. TD and Charles Schwab informed their clients as early as 12/7/22 that "Purchases of MMTLP executed after 12/8 will not receive distribution." Then in the same message they said that trading would continue on 12/9 & 12/12 and that they'd be setting MMTLP to "Closing Transactions Only" for those days. But what do they know? Let's let Amy explain how it was supposed to work 👇🏾
Rare DD tweet media
MARDÜK the CANÜK😎🦋@MetaGuyMarduk

..and @FINRA's halt stripped Uncle Phil of his right to close his position on the 9th/12th. I think @AnnVandersteel and @TheRobbCarter @IsaiahAscher would find this interesting. First let me address the T+2 settlement debate. The prospectus 424b said the distribution date was CLOSE of business 12/14/22. Shares were to be cancelled AS OF THE DISTRIBUTION DATE. A trade executed to close position on the 12th would still settle before distribution/cancellation: (T) 12/12/22 = Trade (Record) Date(for longs) (+1) 12/13/22 = symbol deletion (+2) 12/14/22 = distribution/share cancellation after market clos. Executed trades do not need a ticker symbol to be settled, they just need their International Securities Identification Number "ISIN" (2nd picture below) which persisted until the shares were cancelled after market on 12/14. Phil Alderson @notwellfunded has a 1500 share short position through Charles Schwab. (Self-admitted) If Phil bought 1500 shares from a long who has shares settled, do the rights to the distribution need to be carried by that symbol? No, no they don't. A long is holding the rights, you have an obligation to return the shares you borrowed. That's it. You no longer have a position once you close your short. Phil could buy shares from a long selling to close their position / dissolve his obligation and realize his profit/loss. What he couldn't do, is then 'Buy To Open' a new long position and be eligible for the distribution. We know that because that's what the corporate action said... Yup... believe it or not, people other than yourself read. The fact that you undermine our intelligence (and the brokers) by saying that we didn't understand it is so disingenuous, it's nauseating. We were well aware that we wouldn't be able to buy any more shares, but we could sell them to a short that wanted to exit their position and dissolve any liabilities being transferred into a non-trading, publicly reporting company (private under 15(d)). Trading was moving to "Position Close Only"(PCO) That's what brokers communicated to clients would happen. "New buy orders will be routed for review and cancelled. New closing sell orders should be routed normally, though their may be liquidity issues on the 9th and 12th." -Dylan Greene, Charles Schwab EVEN IF.... a buy order somehow slipped through the cracks, FINRA has Rule 11893 "Clearly Erroneous Transactions in OTC Securities" to reverse them. That explains the "Too Late to Cancel" (executed) orders for absurd prices being reversed. FINRA used their tools. I love how they'll use FINRA Rule 6440 "Halt Provision" and FINRA Rule 11893 but won't use FINRA Rule 4140 "Audit" and perform an audit of their member firms' books and records. Seem a little shady.... but whatever, right? How do you explain Jeff Mendl (former VP of @OTCMarkets) saying on a live broadcast: "We'll see how it trades for the NEXT FEW DAYS" on 12/7/22? (clip included) The last time I checked, a "FEW" meant not just more than 1 , but more than 2(days)... EVEN IF he said "We'll see how it trades for the next couple of days", that would mean it would trade on the 9th. The next "FEW DAYS" means the 12th. (followed up by) Brendan Wickens: "That's a great point. It's going to probably do way more volume than it normally does until, uh, Monday, again end of trading on Monday, so you will have access up until Monday." *taps desk* If you truly care about what happened, cared about THE truth, and care about Uncle Phil not being able to close his position, realize his profit (I think his book value was in the $5 range) and dissolve his liability, then you will hold FINRA's feet to the fire. They caused this mess, they need to fix it. Period. If you lack the backbone to call it out, you're hiding something. Please don't sit here and use Phil as your ruse for the bigger players out there. #MMTLP #FYPM #AFMB

English
16
149
266
18.6K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Kostas
Kostas@ggkoul·
Hi @TheRobbCarter. Boy was I wrong. The Amy @thatgirltrader interview basically proved out the $MMTLP issue. Everyone is stuck because @FINRA halted the reconciliation of any overages. And Regulators need to provide new settlements instructions for a market based reconciliation of overages. Please interview more shills and let them continue to prove out the issue. Transparency of the audited share counts will prove who is ultimately right and next steps towards a resolution. #FUPayMe Unlimited Risk is a bitch.
Kostas tweet mediaKostas tweet media
English
0
145
283
7.3K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Kostas
Kostas@ggkoul·
Thanks @TheRobbCarter and Amy @thatgirltrader for proving what I've been saying since Day 1 of the $MMTLP settlement halt. ALL parties are frozen in crime and Brokers (as proven in FIF Foias) are still waiting for updated settlement instructions to reconcile the over sold allocations. And the S1 delays is proof, since adding more shares to a unreconciled register will confuse ownership even more. Even after 3.5 years of all sides being halted. The solution still points to a market based reconciliation of oversold counterfeit shares that can't be cleaned up nor moved into a private company. Time to make it happen @FINRA @SECGov. #FUPayMe Unlimited Risk is a bitch and we are not going anywhere.
Ann Vandersteel™️@annvandersteel

Naked shorts is akin to selling a car you don’t own to someone else. You take payment but never deliver the car. And then you do it again and again and again. Anyone see a problem with this? #MMTLP

English
3
96
150
2.9K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Kostas
Kostas@ggkoul·
Not going to say who’s “winning” these X $MMTLP Spaces debates anymore because honestly… nobody is. Every Space turns into the same cycle: Deflect. Interrupt. Avoid the actual question. Repeat talking points. Keep people emotionally engaged for hours. At some point it starts feeling less like a search for solutions and more like a masterclass in keeping people trapped in online debates instead of focusing on actions that actually matter. People should be: Submitting FOIA requests. Contacting lawmakers and congressional offices. Reaching out to investigative journalists. Documenting timelines and evidence. Pushing for transparency and audited data. Keeping pressure on regulators and decision makers. Building factual public records instead of emotional echo chambers. The people who matter aren’t sitting in 8 hour Spaces arguing in circles. Noise keeps people occupied. Action creates outcomes.
Kostas tweet media
English
0
57
117
2.7K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Kostas
Kostas@ggkoul·
Whatever @ElfCarbon recommends definitely needs a discussion. Regardless, there should be transparency and reconciliation before dilution. Not after. That's why @SECGov @FINRA and FIF brokers are constantly pushing for S1 delays. $MMTLP Team #FUPayMe likes this alternative thinking of action to get this resolved.
elf@ElfCarbon

I've said this before and I'll say it again - Nextbridge should register with BAFIN and not the SEC. Get out of the circus. Take back ownership of the synthetics from the inside of the system, remove EU 236 exemption. Its legendary. It will work. And the base share price? $1,189; as priced out by BMO & Belpointe.

English
0
48
91
2.2K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
elf
elf@ElfCarbon·
Aka - I have evidence of a Hong Kong broker literally naked short selling - they distributed shares that they could not possibly have because the company hadn't even distributed. Then, a Hong Kong investment company used their ownership influence on American media to straight up gaslight the world into thinking $MMTLP wasn't manipulated with a cute little cartoon - when their country was the first one who did the manipulating. To all the shareholders who have contributed their data, when this is all over I hope to thank you. Its helped with research in the most unexpected ways.
English
26
227
379
10.5K
Jared R Fowler, CPA (LA) retweetledi
Kostas
Kostas@ggkoul·
Bring the results then brag... Until then shut up and stop with the riddles and attacks. Yes I'm looking at y'all... I'm on Team #FUPayMe to get out of here too.
Kostas tweet media
English
1
30
84
1K
Trizzy Trace
Trizzy Trace@tracegirouard48·
Peter Schrager has the Saints taking Caleb Downs in his final mock draft
Trizzy Trace tweet media
English
29
22
483
23K