Rasilli ⟐

35.8K posts

Rasilli ⟐ banner
Rasilli ⟐

Rasilli ⟐

@SillyRasilli

I like (good) software, silly JPEGs, games and some art. Alt: @rasillidoteth

Switzerland Katılım Aralık 2021
1.6K Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
senpai
senpai@Senpaisaysbye·
apple intelligence taking 13.6GB just to summarize notifications 😭 openai app is like 300MB and already feels 100x smarter than siri
senpai tweet media
English
40
3
438
32.3K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@mikker prefer the old since tuna‘s UI is square, not triangular 😅
English
0
0
0
38
Mikkel Malmberg
Mikkel Malmberg@mikker·
Which icon do you prefer and why? Third option?
Mikkel Malmberg tweet media
English
24
1
44
6.9K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@skeptrune it‘s not a new feature. and the form in the demonstration is an image. no forms on the real world are images. and no one accepts a slightly transformed form back. heck the result even has a different aspect ratio.
English
1
0
2
28
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@ChatGPTapp Forms are usually PDFs not images. And they require you to fill it out without changing the form due to image generation flaws. 😅
English
0
0
0
87
ChatGPT
ChatGPT@ChatGPTapp·
Paperwork is better when you can just talk through it. With Images in ChatGPT and voice mode, you can upload a form, say what to fill in, and get back a completed version.
English
316
542
8K
2.6M
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@Makuh90 I mean Windows is even an afterthought to Microsoft so....
English
0
0
0
37
Rasilli ⟐ retweetledi
Nathan Clark
Nathan Clark@nathanclark_·
it’s in gemini, just create it in ai studio. oh, that’s for your personal google one account. for workspace you need gemini business. no, not gemini advanced, that’s ai pro now. unless you need ai ultra. oh agents? you do that in spark actually. no, not gemini api managed agents, that’s different. for coding use jules. unless you mean the agentic ide, that’s antigravity. no, that’s the old antigravity, download the new one. actually gemini cli is being deprecated, use antigravity cli. no the flash model is smarter than the pro model. unless you need pro. if it’s video, use flow. no, flow uses veo. no, nano banana is images. actually that’s in gemini now. unless you’re in search, then it’s ai mode. no, research is notebooklm. anyway it’s all very simple.
English
513
2.1K
19K
1.6M
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
We’re adding new ways for people to identify AI-generated images and understand where they came from. In addition to C2PA Content Credentials, images now also contain a SynthID watermark, and can be identified using a public verification tool to check whether an image was made by OpenAI products. openai.com/index/advancin…
English
301
386
4.2K
603.1K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@thekitze i‘m sure this is bait but what does this have to do with MCP? 😂
English
0
0
0
46
kitze · supermac.io 🐦‍🔥
> be apple > invent mcp ui in 2006 > do absolutely nothing about it for the next 20 years incredible fumble
kitze · supermac.io 🐦‍🔥 tweet media
English
26
54
3.5K
293.2K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@chrisgpt Genuine question, why couldn‘t regular ChatGPT do this or why couldn‘t one figure this out within minutes without any tools?
English
1
0
0
30
Chris
Chris@Chrisgpt·
Omg I’m in love with ChatGPT finances this is genuinely amazing. It took way to long for ai to be able to do this but I’m glad it’s here. I’m so glad to give a BIG middle finger to rocket money. Thank you ChatGPT
Chris tweet media
English
39
13
338
25.3K
Bold
Bold@boldleonidas·
My review for the new Drake album:
Bold tweet media
English
110
20
870
31K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@peduarte twitter‘s just toxic as always, i‘m glad we‘re getting some fun again in tech
English
0
0
1
12
Pedro Duarte
Pedro Duarte@peduarte·
when i first saw spotify's new app icon, my immediate gut reaction was: wow that's pretty cool then some dude with a few thousand followers and said it sucked and in a blink of an eye everyone started hating on it i still think it's pretty cool
Pedro Duarte tweet media
English
707
2.7K
43.4K
534.2K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@justalexoki still a hint of slop in there but i agree it's a major step up
English
0
0
0
42
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog@testingcatalog·
Sample video and early feedback 👀 > I won’t lie, this is one of the best video models I have seen, maybe not *the* best, but a really strong performance. I was particularly impressed by the prompt adherence (except for the one shot with the missing centerpiece), the model nailed all the constraints. > Additionally, the voice quality is much better than the Veo models by quite a large margin. It even added some light background music, that would fit right in with an upscale dining experience. > While there are some continuity issues if you look close enough, the ability to change camera angles on the fly so frequently and with good coherence is impressive to me. Overall this is definitely the new model and quite a step up from the Veo we are used to
English
37
15
253
277.1K
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog@testingcatalog·
GOOGLE I/O 🔥: New evidence of the upcoming Gemini Omni vide model has been spotted on the Gemini mobile app. A video sample below 👀 > "Meet our new video model. Remix your videos, edit directly in chat, try a template, and more." > Based on the description, we might be really talking about the true "Omni" model based on Gemini, rather than Veo. > It also seems to be quickly consuming usage limits, based on early tests. "Usage" is a new tab that will be available on both the web and mobile.
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog tweet media🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog tweet media
English
34
74
1K
98.1K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
@mannupaaji @X Finally, I've landed on layout shift hater twitter. Hating layout shifts is my passion btw.
English
0
0
0
382
Manu Arora
Manu Arora@mannupaaji·
Hello folks at @x this is how you can fix this layout shift happening on icon hover :)
English
39
10
974
107.2K
𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐠
𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐠@CasuallyGreg·
“Pay our employees, because we won’t.”
𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐠 tweet media
English
6.8K
20.9K
262.9K
15.6M
Chris
Chris@Chrisgpt·
Holy shit GPT 5.5 instant 1. Doesn’t yap 2. Talks like a human 3. Brings relevant things into the convo (I was having air conditioner troubles this week) I’m getting one shotted. Great release
Chris tweet media
OpenAI@OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant is starting to roll out in ChatGPT. It’s a big upgrade, giving you smarter, clearer, and more personalized answers in a warmer, more natural tone. And it's also more concise, which we heard you wanted. We think you'll love chatting with it.

English
103
57
2.3K
234.2K
Rasilli ⟐
Rasilli ⟐@SillyRasilli·
I‘ve never believed in crypto and NFTs less than right now but I‘ve also never believed in Sappy more than right now. The honesty, ability to learn and relentlessness of this team is simply unmatched.
wab.eth@wabdoteth

Over the years, we’ve made a lot of changes to the brand, the logo, the characters, the art style, and everything in between, but never really formalised any of it until now. That was because I was never fully 100% happy with what Sappy was at any given moment; there was a massive divergence between what Sappy was, and what *I* knew Sappy could be, and commiting to those earlier versions felt extremely premature. Ossifying these things didn't feel like the correct thing to do, especially when I knew deep down that they would have to be aggressively scrubbed away or retconned (which gets really hard to do once a brand starts to genuinely penetrate and build momentum). There was also a divergence between what Sappy started as, what other people wanted it to become, and what I wanted it to be. Early on, I did see Sappy as more of an art project than a traditional "brand", which is why I leaned so heavily into memetics at a time when practically nobody else was doing it, and why I treated the character more like something alive and culturally reactive--much closer to how people think about memecoins nowadays and not too dissimilar to performance art. I also hated the word “brand” and the corporate aura it brought to the community & surrounding subculture. Being honest, I still think there’s something correct in that instinct. NFTs derive most of their speculative value (aside from the occasional airdrop narrative) from the community and the interconnected social clusters around them, not from “IP growth” in the classical sense. At the same time, it felt like there was enormous pressure (especially in comparison with other PFP projects) from speculators to turn the Thing into something bigger and larger scale than it is right now, because in startup [& crypto] culture, growth is treated as the ultimate metric, and it was applied directly to NFTs despite mostly being antithetical to the IP business. Internally I wanted to avoid this, slow down and take time to figure out what the brand should be, which sounds like total crazy talk in the crypto world because there's a lot of pressure (rightfully so) to grow grow grow, at all costs. We still did it of course, because I'm way too competitive of a person not to, but I think it was very evident from the outside that my heart really wasn't in it (at that point in time, chasing those specific reasons). My dopamine receptors might be fried, but I still find directing/creating a meme that people genuinely find funny more rewarding than watching a random reel of ours get 40M views or having billions of GIPHY views or whatever other metric sounds good to say out loud. What makes this all so strange is that NFTs are hyperspeculative assets that need constant cultural fuel to keep the surrounding network expanding faster than the floor price alone would justify. That model is in many ways at odds with how truly loved brands are formed. Real brands are much more malleable, they take time, they evolve; they’re not meant to be frozen in place on day one, and they're not meant to be subject to a quorum when more drastic changes that disturb the status quo are made. Some of the most adored brands globally took years, or even decades for the artist/creatives to actually hone in on their essence that was then expanded upon and delivered to the world. And I think to some degree, crypto and NFTs create such insane mental dissonance for builders. They train you to focus on things that aren’t actually important, usually through confirmation bias or false signals--of course it would; when you look around and see some random builder making some logically illogical absurd Thing that somehow (unsustainably) prints tens of millions overnight, it becomes very easy to convince yourself that the weird Thing is the thing that works. That's the thing that finally cracked the crypto formula, that's the model that works, that's what with a little iteration could lead to the golden goose that every retail investor, VC investor, and every crypto founder has been chasing since the first smart contract was created. It's somewhat embarassing to admit, but I spent years of my life believing that "tokenomics" was a real thing or that /if you just tweaked [insert random weird crypto-native variable] just slightly enough it could work/. It's different now that most of the speculative juice has left the industry and everything has deflated, clarity is much more abundant now. Another embarassing thing to admit is that a lot of the things we are doing for Sappy now are things I would have done years ago...if the brand was founded outside of crypto, and if I listened to my gut earlier. There really is no excuse for that, other than psyopping myself into believing that there was some special "model that can work for NFTs", or that building a crypto-founded character had to take a non-traditional route, or that what peers were (also) currently doing was the correct way to build, and not just appeasing a shrinking echochamber whilst playing the ponzi token fugazzi game. I wish I could have learned these things a little faster, but I also did start out as a tech bro undergrad that knew next to nothing about brands or art or IP outside of random video games I grinded. I didn't participate in consumer culture or fashion or anything similar at all, I knew next to nothing about business outside of briefly being into crypto/blockchains, and was purely operating off of my gut feelings and what seemed correct to me. Arguably that gut instinct was pretty precise, but the inexperience & uncomfortability is what led to not being able to pull the trigger on certain things or execute in the sharpest way possible. In truth, there is no other way it could have gone because most of those things had to be experienced and there is no real way for it to be crash coursed. This post was supposed to be a two-liner about how I'm redoing the brand properly from the ground up, with unique aesthetics, a cohesive universe with real character development, comics, longer form content (thanks to AI), sharpening every touchpoint, creating proper funnels to guide normies to our products and become buyers/users, but it ended up becoming this long-winded explainer of how we even got here in the first place. Which is a little poetic, because the path to the end is never straightforward. [Also sorry to rug you but this logo isn't actually a final logo I just like many aspects of it and what it represents]

English
1
0
5
165