Sipeed

@BTChannon @bretweber I built the initial working prototype; our engineers will handle the subsequent polishing and optimization.

@SipeedIO @bretweber But R&D is done by just you?

@BTChannon @bretweber There are other more people working on production related matters~

@JoeDesbonnet I mean the two different PCBA.

@SipeedIO I don't suppose this could be modular where you could optionally combine 2 or more 16/32 mic modules and have them sync up?

Want an affordable & cool Acoustic Camera? 📷🔊 Perfect for detecting insect chirps, gas leaks, and partial discharges! We're building 16~128 mic versions priced from $99 to $999. What price & form factor do you prefer? 🤔 (form factor vote in next twitter)

More mics ≠ sharper image. Two different knobs: 🔦 Array size = how tight the spot is (resolution) 🎙️ Mic count = how clean the background is (fewer ghosts, better contrast) Same-size board: 32 vs 128 mics gives the same spot size — but 128 gives a darker background, so you can spot a faint leak sitting next to a loud one. Bigger board → tighter. More mics → cleaner.

@SipeedIO No.

@ico_TC More microphones mean higher resolution, just like phased array radar

@ico_TC just in the vote options, do you mean you need much more than 128?

@SipeedIO How much?

@SipeedIO @bretweber You are one guy doing everything? 😮 What?!

Debugging microphone array acoustic imager — 32-mic beamforming working beautifully. On to 64 mics! 🎤📡 #AcousticCamera

@amoswap Yes, 192KHz sample rate

@SipeedIO Do they work up to ultrasound?

What form factor do you prefer for Acoustic Camera?

@bretweber It is me😆

@SipeedIO Out of curiosity, with all of these products being developed at Sipeed, is it just a small group of people working on a wide range of products? Or do you have a bunch of different groups working on things that interest them? :D

@RomanBellicSerb Yes, it support PDC/NUT !

@SipeedIO Any release date ? Will it support unit combination for hot-swap ? Any metrics readable out of it ?

The #NanoUPS in the miniRack! Fits perfectly in a 1U space. ⚡ Want to learn more? Check it out: sipeed.com/nanoups #homelab #ups

🎉1,500+ backers & $200,000+ raised in just 12 days!🚀 HUGE thanks to everyone who supported #NanoKVM-Go!❤️ To celebrate this milestone, we’ve added 30 EXTRA Early Bird spots for the Go&Go+ bundle. Grab yours before they’re gone—or bring a friend along!✨ kickstarter.com/projects/zepan…

@AlizTheHax0r @AngryFker great, we will consider it！

I’m at 16 ports (one at a time). About 8 used right now with 8 for expansion. It’s expensive. I know >4 ports is niche tho, but if you can make your 4port devices stackable I’d be open to that. Only downside is rack space I guess. Also if I’m going full “moonshoot” - allow two units in parallel for “dual head”. So I can change unit 1 to head 1 and unit 2 will follow it. Am I explaining that right? Right now I have two kvms and an arduino to do this. It’s expensive and I worry it will break so I’d pay a sensible amount for a “real” solution.

We are designing a multi-port 1U IP-KVM for your Rack/miniRack, how many HDMI input ports would be your sweet spot? 🤔🔌 #NanoKVM #homelab

@Halina20011 @kernelstub @saleae Don't be fooled by "raspberry 100m", rp2040 is USB1.1, and with less than 1MB buffer, it means you can't even capture 1ms data for 16ch 100m sample rate. SLogic16U3 is 5Gbps USB3 port!

@SipeedIO @kernelstub @saleae I wanted to buy it from ali but eu just added the stupid per package tax... :/ also idk about the price the raspberry 100m digital analizer costs under $30 while this one costs like $98

Hi @saleae , Could you guys lend me one of these bad boys so I can do my work with the flock cams and when I am done I will just send it back </3

@yomikll 4 at the same time, or time mux use?

@SipeedIO I think four is the most suitable.

Great research @chrisgj198! You've nailed the key references. Here's our understanding: Two possible paths under IAEA GSR Part 3 Schedule I (adopted by NDRP 2nd Ed.): 1. I.3(c) — Automatic exemption for "radiation generators of a type approved by the regulatory body" that meet ≤1 μSv/h at 0.1m OR ≤5 keV. This requires ARPANSA or state/territory type approval first. 2. I.2 — Exemption via safety assessment showing effective dose ≤10 μSv/year under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances. This may not require type approval but needs documentation. We agree the practical next step is to engage ARPANSA directly to clarify what test reports and documentation they would accept. We'll pursue this and share what we learn. @techdrgn For AU customers, we're committed to sorting the regulatory path before shipping. If we can't get a clear exemption pathway, we'll offer full refunds — no risk to you.

@chrisgj198 @SipeedIO I’m glad I’m not the only one familiar with the somewhat quirky nature of Australian regulatory issues like this… I’m hoping that they can reply with a suitable update… otherwise I’ll have to get an iron clad “we’ll refund you if they say no” promise before I order haha

#NanoXray is in the works! Ready for your very own personal #Xray machine? Compact (<20×20×20 cm), Portable (65W PD), Fully shielded for safety, and starting at just $999! Subscribe now to be the first to know! 🚀 sipeed.com/nanoxray

Designing a multi-HDMI IP-KVM for your rack / mini-rack! 🖥️🔌 When it comes to viewing and controlling ports, what’s your actual requirement? Do you need full simultaneous access, or is toggling between them enough? #homelab #NanoKVM 👇 Let us know: