
Skeptical Ass
1.9K posts

Skeptical Ass
@SkepticalAss
At this point, permanently skeptical



Professional Military Education should produce warfighters and leaders—not wokesters. That’s why we are establishing a Task Force to evaluate our Senior Service Colleges and ensure the focus is where it belongs. No distractions. Just warfighting.










I will not be silenced. Labour are only demonstrating that they cannot see right from wrong. They will not stand up for our way of life. But we will.



I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.

Many years of work went into finding exactly how many ballots were double-scanned, deleted, and created for the recount. But I think my numbers are getting very solid now. What you're seeing in the graphic is the original machine count in Fulton 2020 vs. what appeared in the machine recount. Our team looked at tens of thousands of hand marked ballot images, looking for minor bubble marks that could tell us where the ballots ended up in the recount. So we have high confidence on our hand-marked totals. There are an amazing 6,156 ballots images that appeared in the original count that just can't be found in the recount. To compensate, an equally amazing 3,938 ballots were double scanned in the recount. As well as 1,125 in-person ballots and 1,391 hand marked ballots making their first appearance. Where did these ballots come from?! All the double scanned and new ballots caused the final total to only be off by 850 ballots. Thanks to @WarTornTrump and @KevinMoncla for help verifying all of this data and their hard work!











