JB2019

68.5K posts

JB2019 banner
JB2019

JB2019

@Skeptik2019

Katılım Temmuz 2011
1.8K Takip Edilen761 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
JB2019
JB2019@Skeptik2019·
JB2019 tweet media
ZXX
2
5
17
1.1K
JB2019 retweetledi
Jack Prandelli
Jack Prandelli@jackprandelli·
The US Department of Energy just mapped every data center in America. This is what the AI power grid looks like. The dots are data centers. Yellow = operating. Orange = under construction. White = planned. The lines are high-voltage transmission 735kV, 500kV, 345kV the arteries that move electrons from generators to compute loads. Look at the density along the East Coast, Northern Virginia to the Carolinas. Then look at Texas. Then Northern California. The largest circles on this map represent facilities demanding over 5,000 MW of power. Single campuses pulling more electricity than mid-sized cities. Northern Virginia is so dense the dots overlap. Data centers cluster on transmission corridors. Not because land is cheap because power is available. When the line is full, the next data center goes somewhere else. The grid is the bottleneck. Every orange dot is a power purchase agreement being negotiated right now. Every white dot is a utility commission filing, a gas plant approval, a pipeline capacity booking. The $66.8 bn NextEra-Dominion deal, Meta's 10 new gas plants in Louisiana, the Alaska LNG FID push they all trace back to maps that look like this. AI infrastructure is built in substations, on transmission corridors, and at the end of gas pipelines. Link in the comments, to see my stocks 👇
Jack Prandelli tweet media
English
297
2.5K
4K
268.4K
JB2019 retweetledi
Rod Palmer
Rod Palmer@rodpalmerhodl·
I just had the craziest experience at the airport. We are about to board a flight to Atlanta when the pilot from the incoming plane walks out of the jetway. Guy is probably late 50s, salt and pepper hair, military look. The kind of pilot you instantly feel good about seeing on your flight. Pilot walks over to the counter, gets on the PA system, and starts addressing everyone. “Folks, I’ve been doing this a long time. Flying one of these jets is easy. The hard part is looking at 130 people and telling them their flight is going to be delayed.” Audible groans throughout the boarding gate. Most people here are flying to Atlanta as a layover before another flight. 130 people just had their day become a complete mess. The pilot goes on. “I get it, trust me. But here’s the deal: During our landing, we had a small mechanical issue. I’m not your pilot for the next leg, but I don’t feel confident the jet’s safe to fly until we have a mechanical team look it over, and I don’t feel comfortable asking the next pilots to fly you guys until we get confirmation.” He points at the agents next to him behind the counter: “Now, none of this is the agents’ fault. Please be kind to them. I’m the one who made this decision, not them, so any inconvenience you experience is my fault. Just please know that I don’t do this lightly, and I’m only doing it because I believe it’s in the best interests of everyone’s safety.” Now this is where the story gets crazy. The pilot puts the microphone down, grabs his suitcase, and all the people in the gate… Start clapping. I’m not joking, everyone starts clapping for the guy. 130 people who just had their travel plans ruined give an ovation to the guy who made the decision and delivered the message. All because he addressed them with decency and transparency, took ownership of the decision, made it clear that it was necessary, and explained why it was in everyone’s best interest. It’s honestly one of the best examples of strong communication—of strong leadership, for that matter—that I’ve seen in a long time. @Delta, whoever your Atlanta to Wichita pilot was this morning, he’s one of the good ones. Please tell him the delayed passengers of flight 1637 appreciate what he did.
Rod Palmer tweet media
English
12
4
47
2K
JB2019 retweetledi
American Trade Crusader
American Trade Crusader@CrusaderTrade·
Looking for engagement on X? Mention "AI data centers." I am still learning about them and don't have a well-formed opinion on them, but used a mention of them to make my usual push for protectionist-based reindustrialization. I got a lot more engagement than usual. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
2
2
12
130
JB2019 retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the Senior Director of Congressional Replacement at AIPAC. That's not my official title. My official title is something with "government affairs" in it. But "Congressional Replacement" is what I do. When a member of Congress votes wrong on our line item, I build the operation that removes them. I have a budget. I have a timeline. I have a vendor stack. And I have a record you can verify: Jamaal Bowman, New York, removed 2024, cost $14.5 million. Cori Bush, Missouri, removed 2024, cost $8.5 million. Thomas Massie, Kentucky, removal scheduled May 20th 2026, budget $25.6 million. That's the most expensive House primary in American history. I consider it a bargain. Let me show you why. **I. The Vocabulary** The donors need Massie removed because he voted against our foreign aid appropriation. He was the sole Republican to oppose the Iron Dome Supplemental in 2021. The sole member of Congress, not sole Republican, sole member, to oppose a resolution affirming Israel's right to exist in 2023. He has voted against every foreign aid package for thirteen years. But you can't run ads in rural Kentucky that say "your congressman voted against sending your tax dollars to a foreign government and we'd like to correct that." Kentucky would elect him twice. So we needed a different word. The word is "disloyal." In 2014, voting against every spending bill was called fiscal conservatism. In 2019, it was called the Tea Party mandate. In 2026, it is called disloyalty to the President of the United States. I didn't change the votes. I changed the vocabulary. The President was happy to co-sign. He called Massie "the Worst Republican Congressman in History." He called him a "bum." He said "vote him out." We coordinated the timing. I wouldn't call it a product launch. But I wouldn't object if you did. **II. The Money** Here is how the budget breaks down. United Democracy Project, our super PAC, contributes $2.6 million. The Republican Jewish Coalition adds $4 million. MAGA KY, a PAC managed by Tim Murtaugh, Trump's 2020 communications director, spends $5.6 million. Christians United for Israel buys the billboards. The individual donors, Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, John Paulson, route contributions through a platform called Democracy Engine. I need to explain Democracy Engine, because it's my favorite part of the operation. Democracy Engine is a multi-party donor aggregation platform. What it aggregates, specifically, is attribution. A contribution enters Democracy Engine from a hedge fund manager in Manhattan. It exits Democracy Engine as a line item on a campaign finance report in Covington, Kentucky. The money doesn't change. The origin story does. Paul Singer manages $69.7 billion from a tower on 57th Street in New York. Miriam Adelson's net worth was built in Las Vegas casinos. John Paulson's office is on Park Avenue. Between them, they have never cast a ballot in Kentucky's 4th congressional district. They cannot name the county seats. They do not need to. Democracy Engine translates their preferences into Kentucky's. The candidate himself, Ed Gallrein, retired Navy SEAL, Trump-endorsed, raised $1.3 million on his own. That's nine percent of the total pro-Gallrein spend of $14.3 million. Ninety-one percent of the money behind the "Kentucky values" candidate was contributed by people who do not live in Kentucky, have never lived in Kentucky, and whose primary policy interest is the foreign aid budget of a country eight thousand miles from Covington. I present this as a design feature, not a flaw. Why would you want a candidate who raises his own money? Self-funding indicates self-thinking. Self-thinking introduces variance. Variance is risk. We don't invest in risk. We invest in compliance. **III. The Product** Gallrein has no voting record. No legislative history. No published policy positions that could be held against him in a future cycle. His campaign website lists the words "conservative," "freedom," and "Kentucky" in that order. His policy page is a photograph of him in uniform. I don't say this as criticism. I say this as a specification sheet. The ideal replacement congressman in 2026 is a résumé with a compliance guarantee. Pre-tested messaging. Zero ideological fingerprints. $14.3 million in someone else's convictions loaded like firmware. You don't need positions when your donors have positions. You don't need a record when your record starts the day you take the oath. He will arrive in Washington owing his career to three billionaires and four organizations. He will know exactly which line item pays his mortgage. The median household income in Kentucky's 4th district is $63,000. Paul Singer's net worth is $6.7 billion. That is 106,349 Kentucky households. One man, in one Manhattan office tower, earning the combined annual income of every family in the district he is about to staff. I don't find this ironic. I find it efficient. **IV. The Threat** Now here is the part I don't discuss publicly, and the reason the budget is $25.6 million instead of $14.5 million. Bowman and Bush were expensive. But they were Democrats. The base case. Massie is more expensive because Massie is more dangerous. Not because he has more support. Because of what he introduced in the House. The AIPAC Act. Formally: the Americans Insist on Political Agent Clarity Act. It would amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act. FARA. The 1938 law Congress passed to counter Nazi propaganda operations. Massie's bill would require organizations that primarily advance the interests of a foreign government to register as foreign agents. He means us. If AIPAC were required to register under FARA, every dollar of our $25.6 million operation would require public disclosure of its foreign-interest origin. Every donor. Every routing. Every Democracy Engine transaction. Every call to every member's office. All of it, in a searchable federal database, labeled: foreign agent. The bill will not pass. Massie won't be in Congress to reintroduce it. That's not a prediction. That's a line item on the budget. We are not spending $25.6 million to replace a congressman. We are spending $25.6 million to eliminate a regulatory threat. The seat is a byproduct. The product is the precedent. **V. The Precedent** This is the part I present to donors as return on investment. There are 435 members of the House. Every one of them is watching Kentucky. Every one of them can see the math. Massie voted wrong on one appropriations line item, and a coalition spent $25.6 million, more than any House primary in American history, to end his career. The message is not complicated. You do not need to spend $25.6 million on every district. You need one example. One member, destroyed publicly, expensively, and completely. The other 434 learn. The cost per compliant vote, amortized across the full Congress, is $58,850. I consider that competitive. Bowman was the proof of concept. Bush was the replication. Massie is the expansion into the opposing party. Left, right. The mechanism doesn't care. The mechanism has a budget line, not a party. If you vote wrong, the budget finds you. If you try to make the budget visible, the budget finds you faster. The primary is Tuesday. The polls show 48 to 43. If we win, we will have demonstrated that no member of Congress, regardless of party, ideology, seniority, or constituent support, can survive voting against our appropriation. Not a progressive in the Bronx. Not a libertarian in Kentucky. Nobody. And when someone asks how a congressman elected by 478,000 Kentucky voters was removed by three billionaires from New York, Las Vegas, and Manhattan, the answer will be the same word we've been using since the beginning. Loyalty. We don't need to register as foreign agents. We register as loyal Americans. The distinction is $25.6 million and a vendor platform that makes one look like the other. Everything I just described is legal. I need you to understand that. Not "technically legal." Not "arguably legal." Legal. Fully, completely, structurally legal. That's the product. Not the congressman. Not the seat. Not even the vote. The product is a system where everything I just described is legal. And you just read the whole thing.
English
304
847
2.1K
252.2K
JB2019 retweetledi
Dr. Zev Zelenko
Dr. Zev Zelenko@zev_dr·
Alright so based on some of the posts I’m seeing this morning, they’re going with EBOLA this week. Ebola is a ssRNA virus that Dr Zelenko mentions in this video. Please check the comment section for Dr Zelenko’s protocols in detail.
Dr. Zev Zelenko@zev_dr

Here’s Dr Zelenko teaching us how to treat Hantavirus back in 2022. This will be the most enlightening 2 minutes and 47 seconds of your life. Please listen carefully.

English
15
455
889
38.8K
JB2019 retweetledi
Catholic OrthoDixie
Catholic OrthoDixie@PapalOrthodixie·
Vatican II and its supporters are to blame. The SSPX offered to buy this property, but was turned down because Pope Leo and his liberal confederates would rather see a beautiful church become a mosque than stay Catholic.
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf

The historic St. Ann's Catholic Cathedral in Buffalo, New York, was sold to the local Muslim community for only $250,000 and will now be converted into a mosque. This is sad.

English
143
391
1.4K
69.1K
JB2019 retweetledi
Mimi J
Mimi J@TheKanehB·
How did pagers have service absolutely everywhere before cell towers? There were no dead zones w the beeper and no towers. What happened to that tech?
English
413
71
7.9K
1.6M
JB2019 retweetledi
Financial Physics
Financial Physics@FinancialPhys·
Car guys: Are you ready to become career criminals? Are you ready to end your back the pigs support the militardy twats yet? They’re coming for your last refuge
English
59
335
1K
27.8K
JB2019
JB2019@Skeptik2019·
Ice cream was a great invention.
English
1
0
2
18
JB2019 retweetledi
FactPost
FactPost@factpostnews·
The Trump administration has repealed drinking water limits for four different PFAS forever chemicals. Water providers will no longer have to test or filter for the pollutants.
FactPost tweet mediaFactPost tweet media
English
1.3K
7.7K
21.5K
5.9M
JB2019 retweetledi
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Chocolate sold in America is going through 2 changes Almost our entire candy isle for chocolate in America will be effected by 1 of these 2 new techniques: - Lab grown chocolate - Genetically modified chocolate by gene slicing “California Cultured is the startup company that's growing cocoa cells in a tank. A lot of you asked, is this just one company? No, it's the entire industry” But wait till you hear what the Mars candy company's doing that's far worse in my view. Here's what every major player in the chocolate industry's doing right now - Lindt is investing in lab-grown cocoa - Mondelez, the maker of Cadbury, Oreos, and Toblerone, is investing in lab-grown cocoa butter - Barry Callebaut, the world's largest cocoa processor, is investing in cocoa cell culture Barry Callebaut isn't a name you'd recognize on a wrapper, but they supply chocolate to Hershey and Nestlé under long-term contracts. When they move, half the candy aisle moves with them” Here’s where things get really scary “Mars, the makers of M&M's, Snickers, Dove, Twix, Milky Way, Mars Bars, and Three Musketeers, among others, is doing something completely different. And this is cause for alarm in my opinion. — Mars partnered with a lab at UC Berkeley where CRISPR, the gene editing technology, was developed. They're going to modify the cacao tree's genetic structure by clipping out certain genes to make them more resistant to disease and drought tolerant. This is Frankenfood. Genetically modified Frankenfood Here’s why they are doing this Global chocolate demand's rising about 3% every year. At the same time, 70% of the world's cocoa comes from West Africa, and West Africa is getting hammered by droughts, higher temperatures, and a nasty virus Pests and diseases cause yearly losses of about 30 to 40% of the total global cocoa production So major companies have decided to grow it in a lab or genetically modify the trees The question is whether the solutions they've chosen are proportionate to the risk I’d say no, absolutely not. We all know the second these things are done they will start selling it to us with no long term safety studies and no idea how it will effect our health It’s coming so be warned
English
839
8.1K
13.7K
442.1K
JB2019 retweetledi
Ansley Brown
Ansley Brown@Ansleysgarden·
They are bulldozing my family home on August 1st! We do not want to sell! STOP THE TRANSMISSION LINES AND STOP THE DATA CENTERS THEY ARE SUPPORTING.
John Rich🇺🇸@johnrich

Hey @GeorgiaPower do you really intend to use eminent domain on people’s private homes in GA for a new transmission line? I certainly hope not.

English
14
87
182
7.6K
JB2019 retweetledi
Humans First
Humans First@realhumansfirst·
The government is preparing to seize private homes and land in Coweta County, GA using eminent domain for infrastructure tied to massive AI data center expansion. Over 330 properties could be impacted. @ansleysgarden shares how her childhood home is being “taken by force” by @GeorgiaPower…and being told they have no choice. This is bigger than one neighborhood! Across America, communities are being asked to sacrifice their land, resources, power, and water to fuel Big Tech’s AI race. Americans deserve answers. Why are families expected to pay the price for hyperscale data centers? Technology should serve people, not displace them.
English
16
211
435
11.1K
JB2019 retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere." Farmer: "Where did they get it?" Activist: "What?" Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere." Activist: "From... eating?" Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it." Activist: "The soil?" Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from." Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere." Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it." Activist: "Then just don't have the cow." Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle." Activist: "It's not that simple." Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
2.4K
42.7K
161.4K
5.7M
JB2019 retweetledi
Scott Adams
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·
Dilbert 10 Years Ago
Scott Adams tweet media
English
19
102
1.1K
26.2K