Skip Rogerson

@SvfjM8 @ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander There are lots of religious idiots, liars, babies, that need to be blocked directly. Bye.

@ThoughtfulCafe @SkippyTheFDPP @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander There are some atheists you need to block directly , you just have to see the way they talk,and how they look down on theist

As an astrophysicist, I was convinced of a Creator by the ingenuity of the observable universe; but I have to admit that biology is even more convincing. The incredible machinery of a living cell is far more complex than the structure of an entire galaxy of stars.

@SvfjM8 @WillSanderlin71 @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander Why are you so stupid?

@SkippyTheFDPP @WillSanderlin71 @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander Why are you so mad? Lol , the proof for the existence of God is not a scientific question.

@SvfjM8 @ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander No thanks, I've seen what your type are like.

@SkippyTheFDPP @ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander I propose a debate

@MerkMilly @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander Okay. Invisible, immortal, eternal beings don't exist. Therefore, god doesn't exist. Nice.

@SkippyTheFDPP @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander You can use reasoning to see if a claim is even logically possible before having any evidence. If it fails logically, evidence wouldn’t save it anyway

@StevenStubble @sarahsalviander Gee, liar, why are leaving out the other stuff? The stuff I refuted you on. You are now trying to rewrite history, showing yourself unworthy of my time, since you are incapable of having an adult discussion. Later, loser.

@SkippyTheFDPP @sarahsalviander sorry, not sure where i said anything about who's wrong or right. I was just characterizing the basic atheist approach of intellectially shovelling everything back into the ethereal "We dont know" regions when it comes to the origins of the universe.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander Yes, you answer does indicate low IQ. Very low IQ. Your childish attitude does too, as does you inability to follow simple logic, or to use valid analogies.

@SkippyTheFDPP @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander This answer to me indicates low IQ. Even an adult with low IQ cannot understand complex issues.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander No poof in my position, you stupid liar. It's impossible to have an intelligent discussion with you, because lie, misrepresent what I said, and are just plain stupid.

@SkippyTheFDPP @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander POOF! Your anti scientific argument falls all silent…

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander I said nothing about evolution getting the universe to where it is now. You are either stupid or dishonest. Either way, you lose.

Nope. Believing that evolution got the universe from the point of origin (big bang) to the multitude of complex biological systems has been found to be lacking in many ways. You need to update your knowledge beyond what you are stating as fact here. Evolution => Not planned Not planned => Random In this case it’s a series of unplanned events that have more of a positive influence on progress than negative. This works well enough once the living organism is already in existence (like your argument re Shakespeare) but fails miserably when it comes to bringing that complex organism into existence in the first place. Mostly it fails on lack of programmatic information which living organisms possess.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander I see. You are incapable of having an intelligent conversation with, because you are stupid.

@SkippyTheFDPP @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander I see. You are not worth having an intelligent conversation with because all you have got is your own unsupported dogma.

@Dav1536 @Your_Wrongest @sarahsalviander No, it wasn't. Jesus is never mentioned in the old testament (Jewish scriptures). Not even once. NT authors already knew the Jewish scriptures, so when they made up their stories for the NT, then wrote in "fulfillments".

@Your_Wrongest @SkippyTheFDPP @sarahsalviander Jesus birth, life and death was predicted 700 years before. The virgin birth, place of birth, perfect life, miracles, betrayal, death, resurrection and his divinity. All this was proclaimed in Jerusalem where he was slain to those very people by fisherman who were once fearful.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander It's more rational to accept that a complex biological system arose via evolution (which is not chance, educate yourself) than to accept that an invisible, immortal, eternal, all-powerful being (for which there is no valid, objective, positive evidence it even exists) went POOF!

@SkippyTheFDPP @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander You appear to have cognitive dissonance relating to the thought that something can exist if you or someone you trust has not seen it. It is possible you know.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander You seem incapable of being an adult. Making dumb analogies, stuffing incorrect views into others' mouths. You have done nothing to counter anything I've said.

@Nydon @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander Then there's no point trying to have an adult discussion with you, is there? I'm sorry you think Shakespeare either created the first life on earth, or is invisible, immortal, eternal, all-powerful (god): the only ways your analogy would be relevant to our discussion.

@SkippyTheFDPP @Allan_not_Allen @sarahsalviander “Are you saying that Shakespeare created the first life?” 👆😐 Yes. That’s my claim in a cerebral nutshell. 😐 😐 😂

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander To "Thoughtful Confections & Café", you lost, and I won. You contradicted yourself, and you didn't support your claim, then you ran away like a chicken.

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander You are admitting that you don't have valid, objective, positive evidence that your god actually exists. You merely believe he does. Cool, you admit your defeat and my victory. Thanks

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander To "Thoughtful Confections & Café", nope, not my job. It is your job to support, here, your claims you make, here. You didn't. So you lose. I would tell you, "Run along little troll", but you already ran away like the little chicken you are.

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander You said we should believe only what IS true. Not what we personally believe to be true, but what IS true. You say you believe your god exists. So you must be able to show that it IS true that your god exists, not just that you believe it. So go ahead, prove your god exists.

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander To "Thoughtful Confections & Café", wow, aren't you projecting. Do all you people do that?

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander You just contradicted yourself. Don't worry, religious people do that all the time. I win. You lose. "Thoughtful" my arse. LOL

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander To "Thoughtful Confections & Café", the only person wasting your time, is you. I didn't make you post more than a dozen replies today. You aren't in control of your own actions? I'm sorry you lost. Probably a good thing you ran away like a chicken.

@ThoughtfulCafe @jisaac1269_jay @vadabac340 @sarahsalviander Jesus is alive, right? So didn't give his life for anyone. Jesus didn't sacrifice, he got a promotion. Millions of people suffered more in real life than Jesus did in the story book. If Jesus "died" for all, only 1/8 billionth of his suffering was for you. Less than an itch

@ThoughtfulCafe @wendelltalks @sarahsalviander To "Thoughtful Confections & Café", oh you poor uneducated fool. Some of the epistles in the NT are forgeries, and the book of "Daniel" is one long lie, written hundreds of years later than the authors pretend, to trick readers into wrongly believing "Daniel" told the future

@ThoughtfulCafe @wendelltalks @sarahsalviander Yeah, I could go on and on. A god whose book did not contradict itself in places, wasn't scientifically refuted in places, contained no forgeries (some epistles) or lies (book of "Daniel", etc. Such a god would be a greater being than the god of the bible.

@StevenStubble @sarahsalviander By they way, you are admitting you were wrong and I was right, but you aren't adult enough to just come out and say it. You are trying to act like you were right, when you weren't.

@SkippyTheFDPP @sarahsalviander sure, yet these are just variations on the same theme. Quantum fluctuations -- where did THEY come from? "We dont know" Eternal matter / multiverse? How might we conclusively demonstrate this? "We dont know" Something we dont yet understand? "Well its NOT God!" you get the idea

@StevenStubble @sarahsalviander Gravity turned out not to be god. Evolution turned out not to be god. Human embryonic development, planets in orbit, etc. turned out not to be god. The thousands of gaps in human understanding that we figured out how they happen were all found to be due to natural processes.