SlightlyRelevant

everything i know is a lie

At 5 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching more strikes against Iran to continue degrading their ability to attack civilian mariners and commercial ships freely transiting the Strait of Hormuz. The Commander in Chief has directed the strikes to hold Iranian forces accountable.

At what point should you reach $250,000 invested in the stock market?

The list of individual companies you 'purchased' is fundamentally impossible in a standard 401(k) under ERISA rules. These plans are required to offer a diversified selection of mutual funds (or similar options) — not a brokerage account where you can cherry-pick stocks. Either you don't actually know what kind of account this is, or you're making it up. Either way, no one should take your 'investment advice' seriously. Try again.

"fundamentally impossible"

Kevin, the Vanguard screenshot confirms it’s a Google 401(k), and yes, certain corporate plans include self-directed brokerage options that let you trade individual stocks. That detail doesn’t change the core problem with your story. You claim you turned $35,000 into $10 million in just 21 months by going “all in 1 stock at a time,” with no options, no crypto, no leverage or margin — just plain stocks. Let’s do the math on what that actually requires. $35k to $10M is a 285x multiplier in 21 months (1.75 years). That works out to a compounded annual growth rate of roughly 2,432%. Every single year. For nearly two years straight. To achieve that through sequential all-in concentrated bets, you would need: • Near-perfect stock selection and timing on every single trade. • Zero material drawdowns that set you back (because one bad all-in at the wrong time would erase months or years of gains and make the final number impossible). • The market environment to cooperate perfectly for the entire period without any extended flat or down stretches. • No execution mistakes, no slippage, no emotional errors, no position sizing mistakes. That level of flawless execution across dozens of high-conviction, concentrated swings is not realistic. Even the best professional traders and funds in history don’t post sustained numbers anywhere close to this over multi-year periods. Legendary runs usually involve some luck, favorable macro conditions, and still come with painful drawdowns. Your version sounds like a perfectly smooth, error-free compounding machine — which is what makes it read as fabricated rather than achieved. With 8 years in the industry, I’ve seen countless versions of this exact story — the massive documented screenshot gains, the “all-in one stock at a time” strategy, the course or app promising to teach others how to do the same. Almost none of them hold up when you ask for full verified trade logs, audited performance, or long-term independent verification. They usually end up as marketing for the product rather than real, repeatable results.