
Smileememe
1.5K posts

Smileememe
@Smileememe
Smile it always helps ☺ Follow me i follow back read my stuff: https://t.co/j2eDCiDQh8



It’s clear there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how the U.S. residency process works on your part. Match rates for U.S. MDs have consistently hovered around 94% for years, and U.S. DOs reached a record high close to that this year. Most of the small percentage who don’t initially match secure positions through SOAP. As for IMGs in highly competitive specialties, they are not “taking spots”, they are exceptionally qualified candidates, MDs, PhDs, postdoctoral researchers, with outstanding CVs. Residency selection committees rank them based on merit. If there’s an issue, the concern should be directed toward the selection process itself, not the candidates. This isn’t unique to medicine. Just like global talent leads major companies such as Google, Microsoft, IBM, and Adobe, or how sports teams recruit the best players worldwide, merit drives selection. Instead of spreading misinformation, it’s worth taking the time to truly understand how the residency match and broader U.S. workforce operate.



Over 1500 medical students applied for anesthesiology residency at Harvard. 5 of the 18 coveted spots (28%) were filled by foreign medical students.








Man, I love being white.


Have you ever noticed that women always escalate their reactions x100?












