Sabitlenmiş Tweet
$SNOW was at fresh 52-week lows and down 44% YTD. I loaded up.
Snowflake is where the Fortune 500 stores and queries their data. Think of it as the warehouse AI has to walk into to do anything useful with enterprise data. No data, no AI.
Which is why the bear case doesn't hold up.
Fintwit keeps comparing "$DBRX $5.4B ARR" to "$SNOW $4.7B revenue." Apples to oranges. ARR is a private-company marketing number. $SNOW reports audited GAAP revenue. When $DBRX IPOs and shows trailing numbers, the gap closes fast.
And they sell to different buyers. $DBRX owns data engineers and ML teams. $SNOW owns the business users, SQL analysts, and Fortune 500 data orgs. 688 customers paying over $1M a year. 766 of the Forbes Global 2000 on the platform. That book doesn't churn over a benchmark.
The more interesting bear case is AI disruption. It's also wrong. $SNOW isn't getting replaced by agents, they're building the agentic stack. Project SnowWork for autonomous workflows. Cortex Code for AI-native development. Snowflake Intelligence for conversational analytics. Claude Opus 4.7 integrated same-day into Cortex.
And here's the kicker: $SNOW charges by usage, not seats. Every agent action, every inference pass, every query is a credit burned. More AI means more consumption. The Managed Agents panic that tanked the stock had the trade exactly backwards.
$ZETA is the hot name on fintwit right now. $ZETA is a Powered-by-Snowflake partner, Athena runs on OpenAI models, and the enterprise data sits on $SNOW. App layer gets the hype. Data layer gets the revenue.
Q4 FY26: 30% growth, record $400M contract, $1.12B FCF, guidance raised. Not a broken business. A repriced one.
$SNOW trades at ~11x revenue. $DBRX is valued at ~25x private. Consensus target is $237 against a $134 print.
Long $SNOW.
English
