Some_Pole

@aufheben_njoyer @GeordanWithaG @LinkofSunshine The movie is ABOUT Schindler, and it ends in Israel because HE IS BURIED THERE. It closes on the people who he helped survive the Holocaust. Good lord man, it shouldn't be this hard to realise that's the point of the damn scene in a movie about Oskar Schindler.

@GeordanWithaG @LinkofSunshine Now how those this disprove the point made? Nobody disputed that Oskar Schindler existed.

There’s no way this account is real

@Francis_Watts @janetjenkins52 @dubsinfive We have from fossils that sauropod bones were hollow, like birds, in order to support their weight by avoiding being crushed by it dawg. The answers are public knowledge and I know you're likely doing this to get a few cents but this is retarded.

@janetjenkins52 @dubsinfive Structural engineers and architects know that when you double the size, the support you need quadruples. with the same gravity, you can't scale up simply. carbon doesn't explain basic physics.

big things happening over on r/dinosaurs. so if anyone has any insight please let me know.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 Expelling and killing are two separate things and tbh the latter is more serious than the other. At least with the former you get to live, not so much with the latter.

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 3/ You celebrate the 1999 illegal bombing as a "fix" for UN failure, yet you ignore the 400,000 Serbs expelled from Krajina and Kosovo under NATO/UN watch. You don't care about victims; you care about the narrative.

This should actually be remembered as the first series of Ls of Russia not doing anything to save their allies since the collapse of the USSR. And that's a good thing.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 Do you believe if there was an active slaughter going on, you should wait for approval by some body to do something about it?

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 2/ Comparing a complex Balkan civil war to Korea shows a total lack of historical nuance. In Korea, there was a clear UN mandate. In 1999, there was NONE. You’re literally mourning the fact that NATO couldn't legally bypass the global consensus.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 I ain't gonna deny that the war wasn't black and white, yet only one side did an act that is recognised as a genocide.

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 1/ Calling one side "knuckle draggers" while ignoring the 150,000 Serbs expelled from Sarajevo or the brutal crimes of the "El Mujahideen" unit shows your bias. In a civil war, there are no "flower-carrying" sides—only deep, multi-sided tragedy.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 I think the fact you're this desperate to claim Serbia did nothing wrong suggests guilt actually. Especially during the war crime trials that took place afterwards.

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 2/ The war in Bosnia was a tragic civil war between three local sides, not a foreign invasion. Using a civil war from the early 90s to justify NATO's illegal 1999 bombing of a sovereign FR Yugoslavia is pure desperation.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 No, I'm saying the fact that the UN was useless in Bosnia, a thing that literally spawned the idea that UN soldiers are worthless because they don't do shit is why the NATO strikes were needed.

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 4/ If your only argument for 1999 is "the UN failed in Bosnia," then you're admitting NATO had no legal right to strike. You're choosing the "might makes right" jungle over a world governed by laws and facts.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 Actually the UN is flawed because it lost its edge in enforcing international law after Korea. Yugoslavia should've been a second Korean Intervention.

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 3/ You claim the UN is "flawed" just because it doesn't always serve as a rubber stamp for NATO’s interests. The UN Charter exists to stop superpowers from inventing "humanitarian" excuses to drop bombs whenever they please.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 We have literal testimonies from these UN soldiers you knuckle dragger tf you acting like the Bosnian Serbs weren't the ones primarily doing the worst actions in that entire war. 💀

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 1/ Calling Serbs in Bosnia "agressors" is a total failure of logic. They are an indigenous, constituent people living there for over a millennium. You can't invade the land your ancestors have inhabited for 1,000 years.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 Considering there was no UN denouncement of the action, that accounts for something. Because usually you'd hear a strongly worded letter when that did not happen here lmao

@SomePole1 @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 2/ If you throw away UN approval "frankly," you replace law with the whims of superpowers. History shows these "humanitarian" bombs usually land where there’s oil or geopolitical interest, not where there’s actual need.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 UN soldiers expressed frustration at the fact that they couldn't do much else other than "dissuade" attacks on Bosnian civilians from the aggressing Bosnian Serbs. The Yugoslav Wars showed that the UN fundamentally is not the be-all-end-all and is deeply flawed in responding.

@Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 2/ By acting without a UN mandate, NATO violated Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state. You are literally defending a violation of the very foundation of modern international law.

@GoranPonjevic @Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 Frankly, who cares? Lack of UN approval led to things like the Rwandan genocide happening in the first place. Better this than doing nothing frankly, no?

@Probablyno24740 @ConspiracyBull1 1/ Saying it "literally had UN approval" is the ultimate proof of historical illiteracy. There was NO UN Security Council resolution authorizing the use of force against FR Yugoslavia in 1999. If it existed, cite the number. (Hint: You can't, because it doesn't exist).

@FireKnight_750 @ZacB_MN You don't have to side with bigots simply because you have a common thing you dislike, y'know.

@ZacB_MN Take the Palestinian flag out of your bio you lib Zionist scum I call people like you “the Contrapoints puke”. The type who watch 3 hours videos critiquing JK Rowling for problematic tweets while larping as a “progressive” on hellhole sites like Twitter. Truly useless people.

Leftists will look you dead in the eye and tell you defending this is not anti-semitic

@Reik3r @ZacB_MN So is it okay to be Islamophobic to Muslims because of any terrorist group like ISIS then? They said as much that they sought to restore the Caliphate after all. I'd certainly say no.

@ZacB_MN In a vacuum yes, "Curse on the Jews" is antisemitic. But those despicable leftists actually understand important context: Israel calls themselves the nation of the Jewish people and that nation is genociding these people. So Israel is the source of this antisemitism.

@gunk1997 @ZacB_MN Can't you say this about any religion though? Bigotry is wrong in whatever form it is in, the actions of the Israeli state is deplorable but that should not be an excuse to be a bigot.

@ZacB_MN If youre gonna commit horrible crimes against humanity for 70 years literally in the name of Judaism.. what do you expect honestly

@Kibitzumi @ZacB_MN If saying that you wish bad things happen to all Russians is a bad thing (which it is) then why are you pretzeling over this when the Houthi banner says that about Jews exactly?

@SomePole1 @ZacB_MN Omfg bru, whining about Russophobia is as stupid as the whining about the antisemitism. And frankly Russophobia is more of a thing then antisemitism is in this context

@Kibitzumi @ZacB_MN Damn bro didn't know saying "I don't like the Israeli state" and "I don't think 'curse upon the Jews' is a good thing" apparently means I'm an exemptionalist now? Crazy.

@SomePole1 @ZacB_MN No your just a Jewish exemptionalist and effectively a hazbra bot

@CASTALIN69 @ZacB_MN Me, a screeching moralist over the notion that bigotry only divides the working class against the real enemy of international capital? Funny that. I call it being consistent with what I believe in.

If 90% of black people were either actively trying to exterminate Indigenous People in lands they invaded or enthusiastically supported it, sure. You are a screeching moralist; my analysis is based on a fairly rudimentary analysis of material reality. Rhetorical appeals to IDPol sophistry aren’t going to cut it here, chief.

@Kibitzumi @ZacB_MN "I truly don’t find the statement bigoted here." Then you're far more permissive of letting bigotry spread than you may think.

@SomePole1 @ZacB_MN Man a Soviet style confederal socialist group in Yemen would genuinely be saying the same exact shit here if Iran was also a socialist state backing them. If the communist won in Iran the same shit would more or less be happening. I truly don’t find the statement bigoted here.

@CASTALIN69 @ZacB_MN The point is knuckledraggers using the actions of radicals to say that they hate entire groups of people. In which case, you're doing here. Pray tell, would someone have a 'right' to be racist against black people if they believed they had a good excuse to?

@SomePole1 @ZacB_MN 90% of Muslims don’t support ISIS. Poor analysis, shitforbrains.