Literally Who?

7.6K posts

Literally Who? banner
Literally Who?

Literally Who?

@SomeSizeFag

Spergy autistic man infatuated with giant women that aren't real. JRPG enthusiast, Falcom must be protected at all cost.

Katılım Ağustos 2017
895 Takip Edilen373 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Literally Who?
Literally Who?@SomeSizeFag·
My thoughts on Horizons. If you took how many times Renne was raped in Paradise and multiplied it by 20,000 she'd still be less raped than a majority of Trails/Kisekitwt #TrailsbeyondtheHorizon #trailstwt #kisekitwt
Literally Who? tweet media
English
4
1
14
2.8K
XSEED Games
XSEED Games@XSEEDGames·
Ozma’s duty of protecting sacred beasts and the residents of Selray has shaped him into a powerful warrior. Experience #Ys Memoire: Revelations in Celceta on Nintendo Switch on Apr. 28, 2026: bit.ly/YsCelceta
English
4
24
194
12.3K
Literally Who? retweetledi
ねぎしお
ねぎしお@neringi_10609·
今これ
ねぎしお tweet media
日本語
6
331
3.6K
186K
Literally Who? retweetledi
Shy 📼 ❄️
Shy 📼 ❄️@ShyGTS·
Arameria is enjoying her peaceful time at the beach, as well as the company of so many people :> Comm for Lightwing ! #giantess #Sizetwitter #sfwgt
Shy 📼 ❄️ tweet media
English
7
90
855
7.1K
Literally Who? retweetledi
LMX
LMX@luminix_AI·
Miyako Saitou / 斎藤 ミヤコ #推しの子 #OshiNoKo SFWイラスト
LMX tweet media
日本語
22
536
13K
136.9K
Mai
Mai@ggs_cos·
Tachyon training time
Mai tweet media
English
42
1.1K
24.9K
158.9K
ViaTrinitas
ViaTrinitas@ViaTrinitas·
@SomeSizeFag @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ So you do defend the sexualized depiction of children? In other words, pedophilic material? Glad to clear that up. See you're resorting to a different argument here, we already went over this earlier. There is no excusable way to sexualize children. x.com/ViaTrinitas/st…
ViaTrinitas@ViaTrinitas

@SomeSizeFag @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ As i already stated, this is a pathetic appeal to emotion, you have no actual justification for sexualizing children. Therefore you resort to saying "its not AS bad as real abuse". It doesn't matter. Neither are excusable and neither should be treated as such.

English
1
0
0
46
Literally Who?
Literally Who?@SomeSizeFag·
@ViaTrinitas @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ I'm not the one treating a depiction as if the real thing. I don't care if there is an underage loli character getting split in half by a giant cock. It doesn't matter there is no consent. I'm not putting that in the same ballpark as real child exploitation.
English
1
0
1
16
ViaTrinitas
ViaTrinitas@ViaTrinitas·
@SomeSizeFag @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ I care about the explicit sexualization of children, which you are defending. There is no positive or excusable way to view children being sexualized. You refuse to condemn it, further more you defend it. Not even in the sense of defending loli art itself, but defending the---
English
2
0
0
19
Literally Who?
Literally Who?@SomeSizeFag·
@ViaTrinitas @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ This is like when say depiction is the same as being. The whole reset the clock thing could be said about you. There's been plenty of people who have your position that get outted as predators. I don't care what weird stuff adults do.
English
1
0
1
27
Literally Who? retweetledi
Silly Little Guy
Silly Little Guy@Czar_Of_Silly·
こんにちは!ここでは、伝統的なアメリカのアートと、海を越えた新しい友人たちの「アニメーション・スタイル」を融合させてみました。これから先も末永く続く、私たちの友情の証として!!
日本語
235
2.1K
26.1K
435.7K
ViaTrinitas
ViaTrinitas@ViaTrinitas·
@SomeSizeFag @Jenny_the_Huge @AckTheBoer_BigJ There is a fundamental difference between liking cute things, and sexualizing them and wanting to fuck them. As I stated before, this is a major distinction that you fail to recognize. And instead double down on.
English
1
0
1
14
Cozz ☕
Cozz ☕@moefumofu·
Lmfao I activated the hoodweeb dialogue. It's okay that you like lolis, it's nothing to be ashamed about. Liking them while calling it pedophilic is a different story though. (He blocked me btw)
Cozz ☕ tweet mediaCozz ☕ tweet media
English
14
16
357
7.7K