Russ Hollyer
742 posts

Russ Hollyer
@SpiderBATman007
Troops over Trans. Reformed Democrat. Radical leftists leave no room for logic or patriotism.
Katılım Ocak 2023
43 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler

@Florian227 @SohrabAhmari I'm a CEO of a hedge fund. I make much more than the POTUS and have no desire to change careers. Why?
English

@SpiderBATman007 @SohrabAhmari Are you the president of the United States, though?
English

He thinks you’re so stupid.
Acyn@Acyn
Reporter: Did you post that picture of yourself depicted as Jesus Christ? Trump: It wasn't a depiction. I did post it and I thought it was me as a doctor. And had to do with red cross as a red cross worker, which we support and only the fake news could come up with that one.
English

@SpiderBATman007 @SohrabAhmari Nice try fighting idiocy with idiocy.
However Not remotely the same thing you willfully obtuse maga/miga retard
Sheesh dude..with this one you would have benefited by saying fuck all
English

@PoliticalStacy So he says that the allegations are false and then says that he must take ownership for the mistakes that he has made.
He can't even keep his lies and excuses straight from sentence to sentence.
English

@GillisAndrew @SohrabAhmari @megynkelly Not really. These workers are younger. Vests are similar. And they have their LED hand-lights off.
English

@turquoise777 @BenjaminSWeiss @CourthouseNews Not always. Sometimes they wear green robes and it's not really mystical light. They typically use lasers. Sometimes LEDs to save power.
English

@BenjaminSWeiss @CourthouseNews Yeah, b/c doctors always wear flowing white robes, red tunics and religious mystical light coming out of their hands.
English

Facing intense backlash from his own supporters over a social media post depicting himself as Jesus Christ, President Donald Trump told reporters Monday he thought the highly controversial image merely showed him “as a doctor.”
More below @CourthouseNews:

English

Makes one think. What about other groups like the non-binaries and the bisexuals of Hormuz?
youtube.com/shorts/eLGejY_…

YouTube
English

@saras76 That'd have the liberals in fits.
They'd scramble to find some way to slime their way out of admitting the truth. Of this I trust.
English

@BillBisso @tedcruz Sounds good! Let's dig that hole again so we can climb back out.
English

@HardAlbumCover @tedcruz I completely agree. We should return to the poverty levels of 200 years ago, no billionaires, so everyone was better off.
Reducing poverty isn’t worthwhile if the top 1% also become wealthier.
We need socialism!
English

@tedcruz Cool, now do the wealth inequality. This is what a shill looks like boys and girls.
English

@wafflebaconboy @seanhannity Let me think… temporarily pay $2 more per gallon of gas or face a potential nuclear war. Quite the dilemma.
English

@seanhannity They aren't taking the straight. They are blockading the straight. Big difference. Wait till we start paying six or seven bucks for a gallon of gas.
English

The Navy's Taking the Strait Back — CENTCOM Confirms Monday Blockade joepags.com/news/the-navys…
English

@NEWSMAX Democrats have already wasted more money on “investigations” than could be spent on war with IRGC.
English

Time for a new alliance. This has been going on for too long.
Epic Fury.
Nations That Refused or Restricted Support
These countries denied or restricted U.S. access to bases, airspace, or overflights specifically for strikes or related operations against Iran. This is what Rutte referred to when he said some allies explicitly told the U.S., “You can’t use our bases, you can’t even fly over our airspace.”
Spain: Most vocal opponent. Closed its airspace to U.S. planes involved in Iran operations and prohibited use of jointly operated bases (Rota and Morón) for combat, refueling, or related missions. Spanish officials called the war “illegal” and defended the decision on international law grounds.
Italy: Denied U.S. military aircraft landing rights at Sigonella Air Base in Sicily for missions heading to the Middle East.
France: Blocked or restricted overflights for certain U.S. planes carrying military supplies (often linked to Israel support) and handled requests on a case-by-case basis. Trump publicly called France “very unhelpful.” (Note: Rutte still grouped France in the “large majority” that upheld prior general commitments for logistics/basing in principle, even if specific Iran-related requests faced pushback.)
Other mentions of restrictions (less central but reported):
Austria and Switzerland (not full NATO members in the same sense; Austria is neutral, Switzerland is permanently neutral) — denied overflights.
Germany faced criticism for public statements against the war (e.g., calling it a “disastrous mistake”), but it did not impose blanket airspace or base denials like the above.
Nations That Provided Support (the “Large Majority”) Rutte emphasized that the large majority of European NATO allies upheld prior commitments — providing basing, logistics, overflights, intelligence, or other enabling support that allowed the U.S. mission to proceed. This included:
France (as explicitly noted by Rutte, despite the specific restrictions mentioned above).
United Kingdom — Provided some basing/logistics support (with limits initially) and later deployed additional assets to the region.
Eastern European allies — Strong support, especially Poland, Romania, Lithuania, Latvia, and Greece. Romania, for example, quickly approved U.S. use of its bases. These countries are often highlighted as more reliable on defense and Russia-related threats.
Czech Republic, Canada, and smaller allies like Albania and North Macedonia — Publicly voiced support for the strikes or the goal of degrading Iran’s capabilities.
English

I'm going to take a wild guess that this won't make it to the NYT, CNN, and the like without some negative spin.
Would you like some news with your bias? Psych! Bias only. Know your role and stay in your lane. We will tell you what to think.
Edit: I asked Grok:
"Yes, both CNN and The New York Times included plenty of negative framing and critical context around Mark Rutte’s comments — even while accurately reporting what he actually said about the world being “absolutely” safer thanks to Trump’s leadership and the Iran strikes.
They did not directly praise Trump themselves. Instead, they presented Rutte’s positive remarks as part of a larger narrative focused on NATO divisions, Trump’s anger at allies, and criticism of the war or Rutte’s closeness to Trump."
Guess I won again. Well, the odds were close to 100%.
Sean Hannity 🇺🇸@seanhannity
'SAFER WITH TRUMP’: ICYMI, NATO Chief Praises Strikes, Credits U.S. Leadership [WATCH] hannity.com/media-room/saf…
English

















