Russ Hollyer

742 posts

Russ Hollyer banner
Russ Hollyer

Russ Hollyer

@SpiderBATman007

Troops over Trans. Reformed Democrat. Radical leftists leave no room for logic or patriotism.

Katılım Ocak 2023
43 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
Breitbart News
Breitbart News@BreitbartNews·
Oh Yeah, That's What Communism Is Best Known for, Cheap and Plentiful Food!
English
50
38
228
16.7K
Rocco Cupido
Rocco Cupido@CupidoRocc90233·
@SpiderBATman007 @SohrabAhmari Nice try fighting idiocy with idiocy. However Not remotely the same thing you willfully obtuse maga/miga retard Sheesh dude..with this one you would have benefited by saying fuck all
English
1
0
1
21
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
@PoliticalStacy So he says that the allegations are false and then says that he must take ownership for the mistakes that he has made. He can't even keep his lies and excuses straight from sentence to sentence.
English
0
0
0
20
Stacy is Right
Stacy is Right@PoliticalStacy·
Eric Swalwell is resigning - SO LONG BITCH.
Stacy is Right tweet media
English
22
11
153
1.2K
Benjamin S. Weiss
Benjamin S. Weiss@BenjaminSWeiss·
Facing intense backlash from his own supporters over a social media post depicting himself as Jesus Christ, President Donald Trump told reporters Monday he thought the highly controversial image merely showed him “as a doctor.” More below @CourthouseNews:
Benjamin S. Weiss tweet media
English
3
4
4
1.1K
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
@saras76 That'd have the liberals in fits. They'd scramble to find some way to slime their way out of admitting the truth. Of this I trust.
English
0
0
0
24
🌻Ellen🌻
🌻Ellen🌻@ellenh2d·
@tedcruz Really? A chart through 2015? You’re kidding… right?
English
1
1
3
44
Lauren
Lauren@LaurenPcrna·
@tedcruz That graph ends in 2015. Now show the Trump years.
English
1
0
1
50
Bill B
Bill B@BillBisso·
@tedcruz But wait, I have a great idea! Now that we’ve done so well why don’t we turn our country over to socialist? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😂
English
1
1
3
66
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
@HardAlbumCover @tedcruz I completely agree. We should return to the poverty levels of 200 years ago, no billionaires, so everyone was better off. Reducing poverty isn’t worthwhile if the top 1% also become wealthier. We need socialism!
English
0
0
0
10
Bartleby Killjoy
Bartleby Killjoy@TimeLineWatchr·
@tedcruz Cool, now do the wealth inequality. This is what a shill looks like boys and girls.
English
3
0
0
101
Kevin
Kevin@wafflebaconboy·
@seanhannity They aren't taking the straight. They are blockading the straight. Big difference. Wait till we start paying six or seven bucks for a gallon of gas.
English
4
1
10
347
The Same Bird
The Same Bird@TSBirdey·
@NEWSMAX Democrats have already wasted more money on “investigations” than could be spent on war with IRGC.
English
2
0
2
56
NEWSMAX
NEWSMAX@NEWSMAX·
BREAKING: President Donald Trump said Friday the United States is prepared to take military action against Iran if upcoming negotiations in Pakistan fail, noting that American naval forces are being outfitted with advanced weaponry.
NEWSMAX tweet media
English
55
59
295
16.2K
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
@Pjac1235 @NEWSMAX The best weapons were on the ships. But progress never stops. Now they're loading up the advanced weapons. If it goes another week or so I expect they'll need to reequip with the new innovations.
English
0
0
0
8
Paul
Paul@Pjac1235·
@NEWSMAX Shouldn’t the best weapons have already been on the ships
English
2
0
1
82
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
Time for a new alliance. This has been going on for too long. Epic Fury. Nations That Refused or Restricted Support These countries denied or restricted U.S. access to bases, airspace, or overflights specifically for strikes or related operations against Iran. This is what Rutte referred to when he said some allies explicitly told the U.S., “You can’t use our bases, you can’t even fly over our airspace.” Spain: Most vocal opponent. Closed its airspace to U.S. planes involved in Iran operations and prohibited use of jointly operated bases (Rota and Morón) for combat, refueling, or related missions. Spanish officials called the war “illegal” and defended the decision on international law grounds. Italy: Denied U.S. military aircraft landing rights at Sigonella Air Base in Sicily for missions heading to the Middle East. France: Blocked or restricted overflights for certain U.S. planes carrying military supplies (often linked to Israel support) and handled requests on a case-by-case basis. Trump publicly called France “very unhelpful.” (Note: Rutte still grouped France in the “large majority” that upheld prior general commitments for logistics/basing in principle, even if specific Iran-related requests faced pushback.) Other mentions of restrictions (less central but reported): Austria and Switzerland (not full NATO members in the same sense; Austria is neutral, Switzerland is permanently neutral) — denied overflights. Germany faced criticism for public statements against the war (e.g., calling it a “disastrous mistake”), but it did not impose blanket airspace or base denials like the above. Nations That Provided Support (the “Large Majority”) Rutte emphasized that the large majority of European NATO allies upheld prior commitments — providing basing, logistics, overflights, intelligence, or other enabling support that allowed the U.S. mission to proceed. This included: France (as explicitly noted by Rutte, despite the specific restrictions mentioned above). United Kingdom — Provided some basing/logistics support (with limits initially) and later deployed additional assets to the region. Eastern European allies — Strong support, especially Poland, Romania, Lithuania, Latvia, and Greece. Romania, for example, quickly approved U.S. use of its bases. These countries are often highlighted as more reliable on defense and Russia-related threats. Czech Republic, Canada, and smaller allies like Albania and North Macedonia — Publicly voiced support for the strikes or the goal of degrading Iran’s capabilities.
English
0
0
0
19
Russ Hollyer
Russ Hollyer@SpiderBATman007·
I'm going to take a wild guess that this won't make it to the NYT, CNN, and the like without some negative spin. Would you like some news with your bias? Psych! Bias only. Know your role and stay in your lane. We will tell you what to think. Edit: I asked Grok: "Yes, both CNN and The New York Times included plenty of negative framing and critical context around Mark Rutte’s comments — even while accurately reporting what he actually said about the world being “absolutely” safer thanks to Trump’s leadership and the Iran strikes. They did not directly praise Trump themselves. Instead, they presented Rutte’s positive remarks as part of a larger narrative focused on NATO divisions, Trump’s anger at allies, and criticism of the war or Rutte’s closeness to Trump." Guess I won again. Well, the odds were close to 100%.
Sean Hannity 🇺🇸@seanhannity

'SAFER WITH TRUMP’: ICYMI, NATO Chief Praises Strikes, Credits U.S. Leadership [WATCH] hannity.com/media-room/saf…

English
0
0
0
6