Splougy

11K posts

Splougy banner
Splougy

Splougy

@Splougy

Cradle Catholic | Fool from Proverbs 30:2 Operator, V.I.A. | Irresistibly married to @emi_okamura_ | Agent of Chaos | Vitamin K deficiency

Katılım Eylül 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen381 Takipçiler
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
Any tool this convenient is going to have growing pains. I’ve watched this develop from the beginning, and I still don’t share your doom-and-gloom view. It makes abuse easier, sure, but it also makes VTubing accessible to far more legitimate hobbyists. I think the upside outweighs the downside. Doomslop vs hopemaxxing.
English
0
0
6
138
M. CaedoVT
M. CaedoVT@MendamCaedo·
@Splougy Except that didn't take 30mins. Once this has proliferated the big name channels' audiences and more will be targeted. This has made the numerous problems worse by adding a single set of conveniences.
English
1
0
0
552
M. CaedoVT
M. CaedoVT@MendamCaedo·
Guess someone will need to do a video on the realistic consequences of this since you guys cant see the forest through the trees. >scamming is going to explode >commission prices will explode and come with weird tos going forward >channels with bigger, and stupid, audiences will suffer severely >vtuber space is going to flooded with the 3rd worlders, tourists, and people who hate us >smaller/hobby channels will be made even harder to find among the unwashed hordes of what will be the now video equivalent of vtweeters It's absurd that you guys literally can't see this
BananaJuju 🍌🐒@BananaJuju_

HA! They are missing out on ALL the cool stuff - so screw them! I love this program so much! quick and easy to use, even Monkey can understand how to use it. This opens up so many possibilities to create unique avatars for events or other fun streams. Thank for making this possible @Leaflit 💕

English
35
2
61
5.5K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@DumbFoxFurry If you’re gonna cry about it, use the ladies’ room. I’m just trying to piss in peace, not hear your life story.
English
0
0
1
28
Bryn 🦊🏳️‍⚧️ (she/they/it)
genuine question for right-wingers would it make you feel safe if a trans guy looking like this was forced to use the women's restroom?
Bryn 🦊🏳️‍⚧️ (she/they/it) tweet media
English
1.1K
899
19.4K
1.6M
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@MariaGraceVT Why are you showing your midriff? You’ll get ants in your belly button!
English
0
0
3
114
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@SnarkyRevAlan @farmingandJesus Because once you remove the Church, Tradition, sacramental authority, and any living teaching office, the Bible has to carry every ounce of religious authority by itself.
English
0
0
1
10
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
You changed the argument. You said the Magisterium lacks authority because it “changes its mind,” but you still haven’t named a doctrine it reversed. Friday abstinence is a discipline, not doctrine. The death penalty change in CCC 2267, which Rome presents as a development based on human dignity and modern conditions, isn’t a contradiction. So where is the actual doctrinal reversal?
English
0
0
1
6
M. CaedoVT
M. CaedoVT@MendamCaedo·
So only a reversal proves illegitimacy? That's not how that works. 👌 incorrect statements, improper claims, improper explanations... etc etc etc. literally any kind of declarative error or mishandling is enough. Like suddenly deciding that executing criminals is bad, taking back the claim that eating meat on Fridays is a sin, or even hilariously even allowing for the claim that eating meat on a Friday IS a sin. You can't slap the equivalent of "the translators botched this, the text is still authoritative, just not their interpretation" to the magesterium.
GIF
English
1
0
0
22
meta thomist 🇻🇦
meta thomist 🇻🇦@metathomist·
There is not a single verse that affirms or teaches sola scriptura. that’s weird innit
English
88
21
429
15K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@MendamCaedo @metathomist The Church was founded by the living God and entrusted to men. It’s made of fallible men doesn’t disprove its authority any more than it disproves Scripture. What doctrine did the Magisterium actually reverse?
English
1
0
0
10
M. CaedoVT
M. CaedoVT@MendamCaedo·
@Splougy @metathomist You haven't made a point. The magisterium is not authoritative, it's made up of men who change their mind, and even in living memory. They are not an authority.
English
1
0
0
16
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@MendamCaedo @metathomist You proved my point immaculately~ Scripture is authoritative. That does not make it the only authority. The CCC is authoritative because it expresses the teaching of the Magisterium concerning Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.
English
1
0
1
9
M. CaedoVT
M. CaedoVT@MendamCaedo·
@Splougy @metathomist It's not disingenuous. You can't appeal to the authority of a thing as justification that it isn't authoritative because it says does or does not say its authoriative. "This is wrong because it is correct,"? No.
English
1
0
0
18
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@RoPoCZ @Cattman423 Who said anything about a five-year project? People absolutely stay “friends” with someone for years while hoping they’ll eventually get a chance. That doesn’t require a master plan, just dishonest intentions.
English
0
0
1
69
RP
RP@RoPoCZ·
@Splougy @Cattman423 Nobody is running a 5 year project to do that. That's a fake scenario that doesn't actually happen.
English
1
0
16
73
Cattman423 🇻🇦🇺🇸 ⳩
> man and woman become friends > man slowly falls in love with woman > man builds up courage to confess his love and desire to stay together forever > woman thinks man was never interested in friendship Women don’t believe that they can be friends with their boyfriend/husband
Cattman423 🇻🇦🇺🇸 ⳩ tweet media
English
5
15
312
3.9K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@MendamCaedo @metathomist This is a disingenuous question. Tricky~ Appealing to Scripture’s authority does not prove Scripture is the only authority. If I cite the CCC (80-95), you’ll reject it; if I cite Scripture, you’ll pretend I’ve conceded sola scriptura. Acts 15 shows the Magisterium in action.
English
1
0
0
11
17
17@xvii_507·
all girls online have boyfriends, prove me wrong by @'ming single girls 👇👇
English
11
3
98
2K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@cimmerian_v Claude Frollo is an inspiration. He wasn’t entirely wrong, either. Very relatable character.
English
0
0
1
970
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@adnanazmix @coryunbroken You didn’t answer my question. Which major Christian scholars say the Bible was corrupted, and what specific corruption are they referring to? Textual variants aren’t the same as the message being lost, and reason alone not predicting the Incarnation doesn’t make it illogical.
English
0
0
0
21
Adnan
Adnan@adnanazmix·
@Splougy @coryunbroken The bible is circular. If you were to map the qualities of God derived using pure reason, its not logical that God would incarnate himself. Also even the largest Christian scholars agree it has been corrupted.
English
1
0
0
30
coryunbroken
coryunbroken@coryunbroken·
Listen guys. i am a 147 iq genius and studied all Religions. and i recognize that islam is the true religion. Islam, its a Universal religion for all people and makes perfect sense. Christianity doesnt make sense. it has a bunch of continuity errors and logical errors. Although it is A universal religion too. Judaism is an ethno religion and thus not universal. Buddhism is more akin to a philosophy with some religious elements. Hinduism is Modern Paganism akin to Greek polytheism. etc
English
182
46
504
16.4K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@TrenzFur @coryunbroken The Qur’an tells Christians to judge by the Gospel they had. If it was already corrupted or lost, that command makes no sense.
English
0
0
0
21
Trenz fur
Trenz fur@TrenzFur·
@Splougy @coryunbroken No proof the gospel is the New Testament bible if the Quran states Jesus was directly given this Gospel, which he preached orally. Your bible is a man-made collection of later accounts about Jesus. The Quran, though, is final corrective filter for the changes occurred over time.
English
2
0
0
34
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
That isn’t what your own source says. FAIR reports 70% “confirmed” and reaches 81% only by counting items it explicitly labels “not yet confirmed” as “trending.” That is not 79% resolved. Generic evidence that ancient Americans had cities, cement, or fortifications also doesn’t resolve horses, steel metallurgy, or chariots. Name the excavation, artifact, date, and peer-reviewed finding that resolves those claims.
English
0
0
1
44
Matthew Watkins
Matthew Watkins@ITalkOfChrist·
@Splougy They're all linked in those sources. You can read, I have a life, I'm not going to spoon feed you. As I said in the post, about 79% of anachronisms have been resolved over time. You'll see the other 21% shrink dramatically over the next few decades, too.
English
1
0
0
44
Matthew Watkins
Matthew Watkins@ITalkOfChrist·
Modern-day critics shouldn't feel so sanguine about supposed anachronisms in the Book of Mormon. The trend is not their friend. Archeological findings from the past 2 centuries have been brutal for them. They're swimming in a pool that's shrinking every single year.
Matthew Watkins tweet media
English
12
4
150
14.4K
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@ITalkOfChrist I asked which archaeological discoveries have eliminated the anachronisms. Linking apologetic articles isn’t the same as naming discoveries. Which excavation found Book of Mormon-era horses or iron metallurgy in pre-Columbian America?
English
1
0
2
55
Splougy
Splougy@Splougy·
@Yapman1 How could you allow this to happen, be so irresponsible? Be as the mountain goat, flee from danger.
GIF
English
0
1
14
330
🇻🇦Yapman⚜️🍀
Foid tickled my feet and wore my hoodie without a bra. Fuck my chudcel life
🇻🇦Yapman⚜️🍀 tweet media
English
47
8
374
8.4K