SpokenInjustice

On 26th January, I sent the following email to @drpaulclarke: Dear Dr. Clarke, Hope you're well. Please allow me to introduce myself. I run the Lucy Letby Analysis YouTube channel, and have written a book on the Lucy Letby case, which will be published later this year. I have interviewed over sixty experts for my book, including many doctors, professors and neonatal nurses. So far for my YouTube channel, I have interviewed the following: Prof. Richard Gill – statistician involved in the exoneration of Lucia de Berk and Daniela Poggiali in similar circumstances. Michele Worden – formerly an advanced neonatal nurse practitioner at the Countess of Chester Hospital Dr. Martyn Pitman – obstetrician with decades of experience Prof. Colin Morley – esteemed neonatologist Prof. David Livermore – highly credentialed and experienced microbiologist A consultant radiologist who had to remain anonymous Prof. Jane Hutton – statistician who was contacted by Cheshire Police to work on the investigation of Lucy Letby Stephen Phelps – television producer, who previously produced two series on miscarriages of justice for the BBC and Channel 4, and it one of the foremost experts on miscarriages of justice in the UK Dr. Jonathan Moore – who has worked on hundreds of cases as a medico-legal expert Stephanie Davies – a senior coroner's officer, who worked on the Cheshire Police investigation Anna Doherty – a former prosecutor and barrister, who now works in the miscarriage of justice field Dr. Steve Watts – a former police investigator, who has decades of experience in some very high-profile cases Michael O'Brien – served eleven years in prison having been wrongly convicted Dr. Keith Wilkinson – an anaesthetist with decades of experience Lulu Minns – an instructing solicitor, who worked in the profession for thirteen years Tom Hayes – exonerated by the Supreme Court in 2025 Dr. Allan Corder – consultant surgeon with decades of experience There will be another neonatologist, two professors and another doctor coming on the channel imminently. I am also in contact with dozens of other doctors and professors, across a wide range of specialisms. It would not be difficult for me to rewrite my book with another sixty experts. I have hundreds of doctors and professors, and, conservatively, possibly several hundred nurses following me. Despite having spoken to many medics, scientists, nurses, statisticians, and other experts, I am yet to encounter anyone with any medical qualifications who considers the conviction of Lucy Letby to be anything other than an egregious miscarriage of justice. I should also mention that the neonatal experts who have written reports concluding that there were no murders at the Countess of Chester Hospital are of the very highest calibre. I should also mention that they have had access to the medical notes, which I believe does not apply to yourself (correct me if I'm wrong). I was therefore surprised, and genuinely interested, to see you recently agreeing with some extremely dubious people on this topic. This is an almost unique position among anyone with medical qualifications, and I must add that the content and arguments you seemingly endorsed came from individuals who do not have any medical qualifications, which is, frankly, the most generous thing that I can say about them. With that being said, it would be really valuable for me to speak with you, with a view to interviewing you in the near future. I have been searching for anyone with any credibility who might like to support the prosecution in any way, considering that both myself and Dr. Philip Hammond, who has been writing for Private Eye on the case, and also repeatedly requested for someone credentialed to support the prosecution, haven't managed to encounter a single person. I must advise you that the Crown Prosecution Service recently dropped a raft of potential charges against Lucy Letby. The overwhelming likelihood is that this occurred because they knew that it would be impossible to find experts who could credibly compete with the truly world-class panel of 31 experts, many of whom are at the absolute pinnacle of their professions. I'm not sure if you are aware of this, or the credentials of the panel, but it is surprising to see you dismissing this panel, who are at the apex of neonatology, based on a YouTube video, made by someone who has no medical qualifications whatsoever. If you would like to talk further, I would be enormously grateful, it is very important for me to speak with anyone with qualifications who supports the conviction. Please let me know if this would interest you. Regards, Chris Needless to say, I never received any response from Dr. Clarke. For some reason, he has spoken with Liz and Caroline, where I might say that his claims have, surprisingly, received no scrutiny or challenge. I am therefore now requesting publicly for him to speak with me, considering that he has ignored private correspondence. I know that Dr. Philip Hammond has made similar requests, so I am copying him into this message. My DMs are open if @drpaulclarke wishes to speak. If I don't hear anything, I will send further emails, as it's very important for me to speak with him. Unlike Liz and Caroline, I do interact with medical professionals on a daily basis, and I would imagine that Dr. Clarke would want his claims to be scrutinised by those with qualifications. @drphilhammond