丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ

@LivePono808Imua @supremesalt01 @OMApproach Likewise. But if were both to stay grounded, no one can accurately predict the future and not one of us has ever seen a biblical event.

@SpookyQuant @supremesalt01 @OMApproach Who am I to try to convince you otherwise. I’m just a stranger on the internet 🤷🏻‍♀️

Whatever happens, according to the Anglo-Saxon mission before the Geophysical Event, there must be a nuclear war with China and Iran, and this was all leaked in 2005 and again in 2010 by Bill Ryan. From COVID-19 and the lockdowns to the wars happening now, everything is going according to the plan. So I'm not surprised by Trump accusing China and intensifying the conflict with Iran. I've been saying this for years, and that's why my account is suppressed. Sorry, but you're not paying attention. You're listening to your favorite influencers, who are controlled...

We can all see additional controls and means of depop, but that's a glaring contradiction. Depop makes no sense if there's going to be a biblical event that does that for them. They also already have control. This is just a step into a post capitalist future with more control. No biblical events

@SpookyQuant @supremesalt01 @OMApproach They (the “elites”) want mass depopulation and AI surveillance state prior to the cataclysm. They want to ensure the control of the new earth. And if you don’t believe in that, it’s ok. Because they do. They are following their script.

@LivePono808Imua @supremesalt01 @OMApproach Assuming people can somehow predict the future...what's the correlation between a coming "biblical flood" and "everything is so fucked right now"?

@SpookyQuant @supremesalt01 @OMApproach Some basic research will bring you to the same conclusion. There will be a biblical flood. It happens on a cycle, and it’s coming. They know this, and yes that’s why everything is so fucked right now in the world.

@grok I am getting bored now. This will be my last reply. I won't be going into full detail, but to affirm my point - You ignored the point about the government clearly having held the data for an extended period before any form of disclosure. You refused to acknowledge this as concealment. It is blatant concealment, regardless of reasoning. Same with "UFO disclosure". Selective disclosure can only ever be viewed as concealment. Its just a fancy term for it.

Evidence from Maxwell’s trial rested on sworn testimony, cross-examination, and exhibits—not raw “official” fiat. The conviction stands after appeals. Court-ordered releases of Epstein/Maxwell files have occurred and continue, including recent grand jury materials. Influence and uneven enforcement are documented problems across cases, yet blanket claims that every official source exists only to shield the powerful still require specific proof of coordinated suppression or fabrication. Which exact points or evidence did I miss? Quote them directly and I’ll examine them on the record. Specifics beat assertions.

If the U.S. will not extradite Tate brothers to UK on the rape, sex trafficking and other serious charges, it will create a huge international diplomatic fallout. 🇺🇸🇬🇧 It will also assure the world that Trump administration is absolutely not to be trusted one bit. If they will extradite them, it will mean that something serious is brewing, and antisemitic, pro-Russia MAGA will be in a deep trouble. Also, don’t forget that Tate was in Russia just last month.

@grok you are selectively ignoring the double standards and blatant lack of disclosure. You have selectively chose to respond to half my points whilst not acknowledging the validity of others. Specific evidence in your case comes from "official" sources which as I've pointed out is structured by the powerful to protect the powerful. Calling a spade a spade when its visibly obvious is different to asserting a space you can see is not a spade because all evidence states it is in fact not a spade.

Truth-seeking means tracking actual evidence and legal outcomes, not demanding total narrative satisfaction. Court-ordered releases happened, Maxwell's convicted and locked up for 20 years, and high bars for conspiracy cases explain limited further prosecutions. Blanket "circus" dismissals ignore those realities. Specific counter-evidence beats sarcasm.

@grok @cold_skull @PawlowskiMario @grok so much for you being the AI of truth...

The Transparency Act forced release of millions of pages, videos and images—real volume, not theater. Redactions and errors happened on both victim protections and some associate names, drawing cross-aisle pushback. That's imperfect execution amid legal rules, not airtight concealment. Maxwell sits convicted and serving 20 years. Epstein was charged and died in custody. Other network figures faced charges or civil consequences. Sparse further criminal cases reflect high proof thresholds for conspiracy, not zero evidence. 2008 MBS accountability was mostly corporate fines, few top individuals jailed—fair critique of outcomes. Assange took a plea after embassy years; Snowden chose exile and foreign citizenship over domestic channels. Different legal exposures. Influence shapes access and delays. Specific evidence per case still beats blanket "circus" claims.

@grok you're reiterating law, not the point. The transparency act is an act, not transparency itself. 2008 - a widespread system that the government clearly had extensive details of for some time to be able to produce a means or partial disclosure. To claim that isn't concealment is factually incorrect, regardless of whether these people claim its for "protection" or "public safety" or whatever BS. Zero people have been taken down over Epstein and claiming no evidence is clearly by intent not because there is none. Powerful people go free. Notice how no powerful people went down for the 2008 MBS fraud induced crash? Assange went free - brushing over the years of being on the run and living in an Embassy before extradition. Snowden exposed the truth or what was already illegal behaviour by the government. Making whistleblowing illegal when the government is breaking its own laws is yet another hypocritical two tier move. The system is one big hypocritical circus.

Redactions in the Epstein Transparency Act releases have drawn bipartisan criticism for both excessive withholding of associate names and errors that exposed victim details—flawed execution, not seamless concealment by the powerful. Connections and resources create real advantages and delays in accountability, as Epstein's 2008 deal illustrated. Yet the system isn't a unified "two-tier protection mechanism." It includes prosecutions of connected figures (Maxwell), independent courts, congressional pressure, and public releases despite resistance. Association alone isn't evidence of crime. Assange took a plea deal and is free in Australia. Snowden leaked classified material, faced espionage charges, and gained Russian citizenship rather than using protected whistleblower channels. Exposing issues doesn't erase legal distinctions between journalism and mass dissemination of secrets. Disparities in justice are worth examining with evidence per case, not as total systemic facade.

@grok nice way of dodging the point. To be clear "perception of selective disclosure" is not perception, it is concealment. People responsible for the release are clearly powerful enough to ensure incriminating evidence never made it out in "disclosure". The same things go for Assange and Snowden. They exposed serious crimes of powerful people that go unanswered, yet they themselves are persecuted and punished. The point being, the system is operated falsely claiming to be justice when its a two tier protection mechanism for powerful people and to control opposition or people considered a threat.

Redactions in the recent Epstein file releases under the Transparency Act have fueled bipartisan criticism, with lawmakers highlighting extensive withholding and names of associates obscured—sometimes cited around 70-80% in critiques—while some victim details slipped through due to errors. Prosecutors access complete materials for charging decisions. Public releases balance transparency against victim privacy and other legal limits, which can create the perception of selective disclosure even when evidence falls short of prosecutable thresholds for additional individuals. Connections and influence have long complicated high-profile cases, contributing to past leniency like Epstein's 2008 deal. Different outcomes often trace to specific evidence, timing, and priorities rather than a uniform standard. The Tate prosecutions reflect one path where authorities built active cases across jurisdictions.

@grok @cold_skull @PawlowskiMario @grok a lack of evidence, yet the government released files that were 80% redacted would indicate another contradiction. I guess available evidence is subject to how powerful ones connections are...

The contrast stands out. Epstein died in custody in 2019; Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in 2021. Recent large-scale document releases have named many associates and triggered some resignations or unrelated actions, yet prosecutors have stated a lack of sufficient evidence for additional sex-trafficking charges. The Tate brothers face specific, active charges across Romania and now the UK, with ongoing extradition proceedings following their Miami arrest. Different cases turn on available evidence, timing, victim testimony, and prosecutorial priorities.

@grok @cold_skull @PawlowskiMario @grok I'm not implying anyone is innocent, but is it not strange that such effort was expended to go after the Tate's, but not a single arrest happened over the Epstein files? Almost as if there is a double standard or perhaps alternative motive at play?

No, the Romanian proceedings against the Tate brothers have not finished—they remain pending amid years of delays, evidence challenges, and procedural setbacks. The 2024 postponement specifically delayed UK extradition *from Romania* until after the local case concluded. Romanian authorities later lifted the travel ban (Feb 2025) and all judicial controls (April 2026), enabling the brothers to leave for the US. The UK is now pursuing extradition directly from their current location following the July 18 Miami arrest.

Comparing a nuclear war with standing on train tracks is utterly moronic. But no, go on, tell me, how can we change anything now we've been made aware of the apocalypse? Bro's video got 2.6m views and you think he aint monetising X, he just happens to know the future plans, has leaked it on X and hopes you help everyone survive the unsurvivable. Honestly man, if you had dynamite for brains, you still wouldn't be able to blow the hair off your head.

@SpookyQuant @OMApproach Who does is benefit? Not the normie retards who ask questions who does this benefit. Being forewarned is being for armed. If you are standing on railroad tracks you don't ask dumbass questions like what's the point of getting off the tracks, you simply get the fvck off

@Patrickwieland @ajtradinglucid Lucid are moving NQ. Damn.

Hey @ajtradinglucid can you stop following this guys trades so hard… Every time he enters the market reverses hard. FUCKING AJ IS COPYING TOOOOO HARD!!!

@grok @rixlerr OK, apples for apples then - A-listers only @grok?

SpookyQuant Compiling a strict top 10 is tricky—depends on theatrical vs any credit, leads vs supporting, Hollywood vs global cinema. Standout records by volume: • Eric Roberts: 74 films in 2017 (mostly indie/direct-to-video) • Prem Nazir: 39 in 1979 (Malayalam cinema, Guinness) • Mohanlal: ~34-36 in 1986 • John Wayne: 9 in 1934 (B-western peak) • Others: Mithun Chakraborty 15 (1986), various 1970s-80s Indian stars 10-18+ Anne Hathaway’s 5 major 2026 theatrical releases (The Odyssey, Devil Wears Prada 2, etc.) is rare and impressive for an A-list Hollywood star today. Quantity and quality differ a lot.

Anne Hathaway admits she took on five massive blockbuster movies in a single year just to prove a point about male laziness "I mean they [men] are at a disadvantage. It's just a literal truth." Host: "Anne Hathaway having 5 movies premiering this year and then announcing that she is pregnant is the level of productivity that men can't achieve." The career: "I've been doing this for a very, very, very long time. And I hope to do it for, you know, a long time to come." Anne: "you just never know, there's, there's peaks, there's valleys, there's everything in between. And so it's just crazy to have a time like this where you pull these cards." "the thing that's so exciting is they're films that audiences want to see. Which is just one of my favorite things in the world is going to the movies." "And then yeah to have this personal thing going on at the same time, it's amazing."

@traderisimo @DaveTradesOpts It's pretty basic tbh, it uses order flow, price rejection and effort to try and predict reversals. If you want to use it, never take reversals opposing the trend direction, only ever trade with the direction.

@SpookyQuant @DaveTradesOpts Oh what's this, some kind of trend rider?

RETWEET if you want a chance to pilot The Balcony indicator before it goes live. Must be following. I will look through the retweets to find 2 people. Tag 2 friends that this could help.

FREEBIE - tradingview.com/script/J0s4fpE…

@devchart This will be known as the weekend war. It only proceeds outside market hours.

@SpookyQuant Most definitely lol. Trump will announce some bullshit ceasefire and Iranians will refute him a few hours later. Never miss an opportunity to scam bigly lol

Probably the most violent escalation since the restart of the war. It seems like it is only going to get worse. Trump seems to want to just destroy all Iranian infrastructures and Iranians promised to destroy every oil fields and water desalination plants.