SportsStatsFan

55.5K posts

SportsStatsFan banner
SportsStatsFan

SportsStatsFan

@SportsStatsFan

I fact check and I provide historical context. Formerly @SportsNMore1453 Feel free to use my graphics to fact check others. https://t.co/i3NZ9yOBmI

Reality Katılım Nisan 2023
1.2K Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
Two Tiktok LeDummies have Bron over Jordan. They have Magic and Bird 8-10. Wilt is 11-14. No defense no finals Nash is 24-26 yet Stockton mid 30’s. One has David Robinson 31. This is why I can’t take anyone serious that has Bron as goat. They will show their ignorance when they make their greatest lists Keep in mind, Bron statistically outplayed by 24 players in 57 series while MJ only 2 in 37 series
SportsStatsFan tweet media
Nerd Sesh@Nerd_Sesh

We ranked the Top 50 players in NBA history! What stands out?

English
5
2
24
2.1K
Nerd Sesh
Nerd Sesh@Nerd_Sesh·
We ranked the Top 50 players in NBA history! What stands out?
Nerd Sesh tweet mediaNerd Sesh tweet media
English
284
25
884
436.2K
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
2004-05 is 2005 season, 1st yr effective handcheck ban year Kobe: 2004: 24.0ppg 5.1apg 55.1%TS 2005: 27.6 6.0apg 56.3% 2006: 35.4ppg 4.5apg 55.9% 2007: 31.6ppg 5.4apg 58% Iverson: 90s: 23.7ppg 6.3apg 51.9%TS 98&99 season: 26.8ppg 4.6apg 50.8% 03&04: 27.1ppg 6.0apg 49.1% 2003: 27.6ppg 5.5apg 50.0% 2004: 26.4ppg 6.8apg 47.8% 2005: 30.7ppg 7.9apg 53.2% 2006: 33ppg 7.4apg 54.2% (Age 30) Nash 2002-04: 16.7pts 7.9ast 58.9%TS 2004: 14.5ppg 8.5apg 59% 2005: 15.5ppg 11.5apg 60.6% 2006: 18.8ppg 10.5apg 63.2% 2007: 18.6pppg 11.6apg 65.4% (age 32) 2008-11: 16.0ppg 10.8apg 61.9% (age 33-36)
SportsStatsFan tweet mediaSportsStatsFan tweet media
Lietuvių
0
0
2
45
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
So you’re saying Jordan dominated in an era where the game incentivize post play big guys like Hakeem Shaq David Robinson Ewing etc? And you think it was harder to score in the Kobe years despite the NBA forming a committee in 2001 to start changing rules to make offense easier? And it’s pure coincidence that Kobe saw his explosive stats in 2006 and 2007 after the handcheck ban that lead to perimeter players stats sky rocketing? And free throw rates went sky rocketing as they enforced the handcheck ban. Attached are nba execs acknowledging they changed rules to make offense easier, especially perimeter offense. And data to back it up Funny how so many players at around 30 and above saw their best offensive seasons after the handcheck ban
SportsStatsFan tweet mediaSportsStatsFan tweet media
English
2
0
8
131
MambaRomeo
MambaRomeo@DogeRomeo·
The knock on Jordan is .. He didn’t start winning until Bird, Magic and Isiah were at the end of their careers. Jordan was 1-9 to start his playoff career against those guys Then he played in the plumber era. Yes, the game was physical, but the era of players wasn’t all that, especially in the guard position! It was all about big man. I mean, can you imagine Hornyyysack guarding prime Kobe? John Starks? Kobe would put up 40 a game. Jordan played less competition than Kobe, especially at the guard position! Kobe played better teams, better players, better defense and the same physicality as Jordan’s time. That’s why I have Kobe as the goat 🐐
MambaRomeo tweet mediaMambaRomeo tweet media
English
11
0
3
1.6K
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan However the competition is simply not the same as it is today, that is why its impossible to recreate his impact in modern day, players are to good. It is literally just understanding relative impact and judging players on a case to case basis???
English
1
0
0
8
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
They don’t get it. A better analogy is whether or not Albert Einstein is one of the most brilliant people ever or are PhD students in physics more intelligent than Einstein since they know more than Einstein? The answer is clearly that Einstein is extremely brilliant and more brilliant than all or nearly all PhD Physics students. The only difference is there was less known knowledge 100yrs ago and PhD today have access to all that knowledge gained since Einstein as well as access to better tools (calculators, computers). Einstein in today’s environment would have access to that and be one of the most brilliant people…or THE most brilliant person today
Hoopin' N Hollerin’@hoopinghollerin

THE EVOLUTION OF THE GAME

English
6
5
33
2K
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
WHY doesn’t it make it true Explain how the best players today aren’t the best players ever. Who is the goat and who are the top 3 players ever? You won’t explain because you can’t seem to understand something so simple I asked you specific questions but you’re refusal to answer suggest you are incapable of understanding OR you understand it but are dishonest and refuse to answer the questions knowing it proves you’re argument wrong
English
1
0
0
14
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan Bc its called understanding context. I repeat 2 things can be true. They were worse players compared to now, that doesn’t make what they did less impressive. Again Bill Russell had the greatest impact ever. So great it is literally not possible to recreate his impact now
English
1
0
0
10
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan There could be a variety of factors, but I also know that NFL players have evolved. Look at the QB position, the off plat form ability, scramble ability, these are more common now then ever before. The game and players evolved what is this analogy?
English
1
0
0
7
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan What how is that the conclusion u just got to. If u put an MPJ in the 50s he would like insane? That not the point tho? It how good you are relative to you peers, and how good your peers are matters?????
English
2
0
0
17
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
You’re not answering because you’re a caught lying Seriously, how the hell you think you’re rights but won’t answer the questions? You absolutely know that players today would take fewer 3 shots in the 90s Don’t lie that I’m bias when you can’t answer the questions. 10 people replied like you and not one of you would answer the questions knowing it proves my point And no strawmans…I never said Curry wouldn’t be great in the 90’s. I said he is better in there 2010’s or at most he would be equal in the 90’a to 2010’s. And Shaq would be worse today for the exact opposite reasons…the 90s game incentivize post play more than today relative to league average
English
0
0
0
12
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
@KnickWitDaKnack That’s awesome! I collected cards but no idea whatever happened to them. I’m sure my parents threw them away when I was in college or shortly after college
English
0
0
1
16
Knick With The Knack
Knick With The Knack@KnickWitDaKnack·
It’s real, I actually have 4 of that card!! Was going through my collection that my Dad gave me of his cards from the 60s. Lot’s more gems in there like Roberto Clemente, Pete Rose, Mickey Mantle, and Willy Mays. Plus some fun ones like Dave DeBusschere as a White Sox Pitcher and Bob Uecker!
English
1
0
1
30
Knick With The Knack
Knick With The Knack@KnickWitDaKnack·
Any baseball fans out there heard of this guy?🤣🤣
Knick With The Knack tweet mediaKnick With The Knack tweet media
English
3
1
18
252
m
m@quartermik·
@SportsStatsFan The bulls did worse in the playoffs with him back
English
1
0
0
5
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
Funny how Bronstans NEVER respond to me when I lay out the facts that Jordan was better than LeBron. It’s a common pattern…Bronstans claim Bron is the goat, I give facts and evidence that MJ was better, they ignore it all and never write down a Bron goat case
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan

@Nerd_Sesh @Carsobi Trash opinions. Jordan statistically better than LeBron, far more clutch, more titles FMVPs MVPs & yet Bron is the goat? Have you put your argument in writing? Some have also measured MJ’s on off net rating for career postseason. Net rating: MJ +18.1 Bron: +9.3 (+10.5 thru 35)

English
12
7
47
2.4K
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
@SportsSteady @Potacio4 ATHLETIC prime. He had some injuries in 1993 and last half a step It’s like 1992 or 1993 Jordan vs 1990. Still VERY athletic but not at his peak
English
0
0
1
17
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
Example 4 of 90’s players that were very athletic but weren’t star players…Brent Barry. Brent Barry never made an all-star yet was very athletic and was a lights out 3pt shooter. Career 40.5% 3pt shooter. He is the son of NBA great Rick Barry. x.com/redapples/stat…
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan

Example 3 of 1990’s players that were very athletic but weren’t star players. This one is a little of a cheat…this athletic player wasn’t good enough to make the 1990’s NBA. College player Jarvis Basnight in 1988 jumps over defender on the dunk.

English
30
48
469
112.3K
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
1. We agree 2. We agree 3. We mostly agree but you’re just not getting it 😂😂 I literally said Curry in the 90’s would be like Curry in 2010’s so no change…that’s assuming he gets 11 fga from 3. But he won’t so 2010’s is even better for Curry because his 3pt which is how he space the floor to maximize impact would NOT be allowed to same extent in 90’s…due to your answer in 1 and 2
English
0
0
0
12
Haissam Mourad
Haissam Mourad@H_aissa_M·
@SportsStatsFan @TChill23 @LegendOfWinning 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. No because even in an era now where threes are being rained left and right, Steph is still a cut above the rest in terms of 3pt shooting. Mahbe league wide players are more efficient but individually no one has the volume of Steph while having his efficiency.
English
1
0
0
15
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
But you’re entirely missing the point 😂😂 Your arguement literally means the best player(s) are the best ever. They evolved and better than before I’m saying that such an argument isn’t what we think of when talking about players of different eras. But please do explain how “that doesn’t necessarily mean older players are worse”. How are they not worse with how you describe it?
English
2
0
0
25
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan To be fair I didn’t really watch the video, bc most podcasts do not know a lick about bball, but Im simply saying 2 things can true. Players have evolved and are better than before. That doesn’t necessarily mean older players are worse, thats all. Its rly all relative impact
English
1
0
0
10
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
@3lijahloiseau How is related? Different things. Thus different descriptions. For example, fewer and fewer people today playing football. The pool is shrinking. Does that mean the game isn’t evolving????!
English
1
0
0
11
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan Talent pool is related to evolution tho no? Players have access to more, know more, and thus can grow and take even more steps forward. Players across the board have majorly evolved, as well as how the game itself is played.
English
1
0
0
16
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
@3lijahloiseau Got it, so a player today couldn’t compete in past. Or Einstein today isn’t that brilliant?
English
1
0
0
17
Jah
Jah@3lijahloiseau·
@SportsStatsFan Yes, but it has evolved. The game has evolved, schemes and skillsets have greatly grown since then. A bob cousy is likely not even a college player now. That doesn’t mean one is going to take away from how impactful Bill was just bc of the era, its understanding relative impact
English
1
0
0
23
SportsStatsFan
SportsStatsFan@SportsStatsFan·
@quartermik How so? Heat added Bron and Bosh. So Bron and Bosh equal Jordan? I agree!
English
1
0
0
16
m
m@quartermik·
@SportsStatsFan We agree the bulls added the best player in basketball an did worse in the playoffs while the heat did the opposite?
English
1
0
1
11