SraDanvers

658 posts

SraDanvers banner
SraDanvers

SraDanvers

@SraDanvers

Katılım Mart 2026
105 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
SraDanvers retweetledi
The Husky
The Husky@Mr_Husky1·
In the winter of 1944 at Auschwitz-Birkenau, Gena, a young Polish woman who had already seen most of her family die in the Krakow ghetto, was pushed naked, along with hundreds of other women, into a cold, concrete-walled room. The heavy iron doors were sealed with a dull bang. Gena Turgel waited. In that place, the line between life and nothingness was as thin as a breath. She waited for the Zyklon B gas to come down the pipes and end her torment. Minutes went by. The silence was broken only by quiet cries and prayers. But the gas never came. Because of a mechanical problem, a mistake, or what she would always call "divine intervention," the valves stayed closed. When the guards reopened the doors, surprised to find the prisoners alive, Gena walked out on her own. She would later say simply: "God must have protected me." But Gena’s ordeal was not over. She was sent to Bergen-Belsen, where conditions were even worse. There, surrounded by death and disease, she cared for a dying young girl: Anne Frank. Gena remembered Anne as a fragile, feverish little girl, reduced to a shadow of her former self in her final days. Despite the risk of contagion, shel brought her water and tried to wash her, desperately trying to ease her suffering. Gena held her hand, offering her the human warmth that Nazism sought to eradicate. It was Gena herself who witnessed how terrified and delirious Anne was from typhus, yet still capable of a touching sweetness. The memory of Anne's eyes remained etched in Gena's heart forever, a symbol of innocence the world had failed to protect. The real miracle happened on April 15, 1945. When British troops arrived, Gena met Norman Turgel, a British intelligence officer. They fell in love right away, even among the ruins. Norman was moved by Gena’s dignity and strength, even though she was very thin, her eyes were full of life. Six months after the liberation, Gena married Norman. Her dress was made from the fabric of a British Army parachute, a symbol of salvation fallen from the sky. That dress is now preserved at the Imperial War Museum in London. Gena Turgel lived to be 95, becoming one of the sweetest and most authoritative voices in memory. She spent the rest of her life telling her story in schools, not with anger, but with a deep desire that the world would never forget the value of a single breath. Even in the darkest times, hope can survive. Gena did more than survive; she turned the horror she faced into the love of a family and a lasting story of strength.
The Husky tweet media
English
13
200
1.1K
28.6K
SraDanvers retweetledi
+*:ꔫ:*Ezra Jolly*:ꔫ:*﹤
+*:ꔫ:*Ezra Jolly*:ꔫ:*﹤@Gatsbys_lament·
David Burke, who played Watson in the first season of Granadas Sherlock Holmes passed away today. He played a damn perfect young Watson who’s somewhat frustrated yet intrigued by Holmes strange antics May he rest in peace, he’s made so many of us laugh and smile.
English
110
2.2K
6.2K
200.8K
SraDanvers retweetledi
Luce
Luce@lucyshow11·
Throwback Thursday to some of the most beautiful female singers of the 80s! Who’s your favorite? 🔥
English
809
678
8.6K
726.8K
SraDanvers retweetledi
Tolkien Universe
Tolkien Universe@tolkienzone·
You can’t fool me. That’s not a volcanic eruption, it’s Gandalf facing off against Durin’s Bane.
English
86
1.3K
11.1K
215.9K
SraDanvers retweetledi
b
b@wwxwashere·
we need to go back to treating ao3 as an archive for passion projects rather than a social media site for "content"
English
11
1.5K
9.4K
58.5K
SraDanvers retweetledi
Crazy Vibes
Crazy Vibes@CrazyVibes_1·
In 1998, Fran Drescher was untouchable. She had created, produced, and starred in The Nanny — one of the most-watched sitcoms on the planet. Her character, Fran Fine, the big-hearted, loud, impossibly stylish woman from Queens, had made her a household name in over 60 countries. By the show's final season, she was among the highest-paid actresses on American television. From the outside, her life looked perfect. Inside, something was quietly falling apart. It started with symptoms that felt impossible to ignore — cramping, irregular bleeding, a persistent pelvic pain that didn't respond to anything. She made an appointment with her doctor. Then another. Then another. Each one ran tests. Each one delivered the same calm, confident verdict: Perimenopause. Perfectly normal for your age. She tried hormone replacement therapy, as recommended. It made things worse. The bleeding intensified. The pain didn't ease. "Something is really wrong," she told doctor number six. "You're too young for anything serious," he replied. "You're too thin to fit the cancer profile," said another. One doctor — and this part is not a joke — told her she was probably eating too much spinach. For two years, Fran saw eight different doctors. None of them ordered the one test that could have answered everything: a simple endometrial biopsy. She wasn't a hypochondriac. She wasn't overreacting. She was a woman describing real symptoms to credentialed professionals, and every single one of them sent her home. Then she found doctor number eight. This physician looked at two years of medical history — the dismissed symptoms, the failed treatments, the worsening pattern — and said four words that changed everything: "Let's do a biopsy." Three days later, the phone rang. Uterine cancer. Stage I. Growing inside her for years while doctor after doctor told her she was fine. She was 42 years old. The surgery was successful. The cancer was removed. She was going to live. But Fran couldn't simply move on. In 2002, she published a memoir — Cancer Schmancer — about navigating a medical system that had nearly cost her everything. She expected to share her story, promote the book, and get back to her career. Instead, something happened at every single stop on her book tour. Women lined up. Dozens of them. Then hundreds. "My doctor told me I was too young." "They said it was stress. It was ovarian cancer." "Three years of symptoms before anyone ran a test." Her story wasn't unique. It was everywhere. It was systemic. Women were being dismissed across every age group, income level, and geography — and some of them were dying because of it. Fran made a decision: she was not going to let that continue. In 2007, she launched the Cancer Schmancer Movement, a nonprofit with one clearly defined mission — ensure that women's cancers are caught at Stage I, when survival rates are highest. She didn't write a check and step away. She became the organization. She lobbied members of Congress directly. She testified on Capitol Hill. She pushed until lawmakers passed the Gynecologic Cancer Education and Awareness Act into federal law — a national program dedicated to educating women about the warning signs of gynecological cancers. The vote in Congress was unanimous. Not a single opposing voice. Cancer Schmancer deployed mobile screening clinics into underserved communities, offering free mammograms and cancer screenings to women who had no other access. Thousands of women were reached. Some of them caught cancers early enough to survive. She changed how a generation of women thought about their own health — not as patients who wait passively, but as informed consumers with the right to demand answers. For years, she balanced advocacy with her entertainment career. Acting, voicework, Broadway. But the platform always served the mission. Then, in 2021, she did something that surprised almost everyone. She ran for president of SAG-AFTRA — the union representing 160,000 actors, broadcasters, and media professionals across America. Hollywood insiders were skeptical. The entertainment press was uncertain. Fran had never led a major labor organization. She won anyway. And in the summer of 2023, she showed everyone exactly why. After negotiations with major Hollywood studios collapsed — over fair pay, streaming residuals, and the looming threat of artificial intelligence replacing human performers — Fran led SAG-AFTRA into the largest actors' strike in the industry's history. Forty thousand actors joined 11,000 striking writers. Hollywood shut down completely. No filming. No premieres. No press tours. On the first day of the strike, Fran stood before the world's cameras and delivered a speech that stopped people mid-scroll: "How they plead poverty — while handing hundreds of millions of dollars to their own CEOs? It is disgusting. Shame on them." The internet erupted. Even the skeptics went quiet. David Simon, creator of The Wire, who had publicly doubted her leadership, wrote simply: "I'll confess I thought she was a lost ball in tall grass. I was wrong." She showed up on picket lines every day. She refused every offer that fell short. She negotiated without blinking. After 118 days, the studios gave in. SAG-AFTRA secured historic gains: substantially higher pay, landmark protections against AI, improved residuals, and better working conditions across the industry. It was the most consequential labor victory in Hollywood's modern era. In September 2023, her members re-elected her with 81% of the vote. Today, Fran Drescher is 68 years old. She has been cancer-free for 26 years. The organization she built from a book tour and a wave of shared grief has shaped national health policy and reached thousands of women who might otherwise never have been screened. She leads one of the most powerful unions in entertainment. And all of it — every bit of it — traces back to a single quality she has never been willing to surrender: The refusal to accept being dismissed. Eight doctors told her she was fine. She knew they were wrong, and she kept going until someone finally listened. A medical system told women their symptoms didn't matter. She changed the law. Studio executives told actors to accept less. She said no — and won. Fran Drescher was never just the woman with the famous voice and the iconic laugh. She was always the woman who refused to be quiet until the room had no choice but to listen.
Crazy Vibes tweet media
English
12
69
210
8.8K
SraDanvers retweetledi
debs 🏒
debs 🏒@ilyaslestat·
debs 🏒 tweet media
ZXX
12
3.6K
19.3K
119.5K
mat
mat@user_300715·
139.
mat tweet mediamat tweet mediamat tweet mediamat tweet media
32
52
2.2K
93.3K
mat
mat@user_300715·
#hollanov smau where Shane and Ilya are both in the same frat, Shane has a girlfriend but they keep hooking up everytime they are drunk. Everyone knows and no one cares, just thinks it's funny as fuck. They are just like "ah yes Shane and Ilya the blowjob bros"
mat tweet mediamat tweet mediamat tweet mediamat tweet media
English
37
350
5K
648.4K
mat
mat@user_300715·
Anyone down for an update in like 3 hours⁉️
mat@user_300715

#hollanov smau where Shane and Ilya are both in the same frat, Shane has a girlfriend but they keep hooking up everytime they are drunk. Everyone knows and no one cares, just thinks it's funny as fuck. They are just like "ah yes Shane and Ilya the blowjob bros"

English
132
19
2.2K
44.5K
SraDanvers retweetledi
tay 🏒
tay 🏒@acdhollanov·
has everyone seen this…in my top 5 best hr edits and one of the best edits i’ve ever seen oh my god
English
2
20
180
4.1K
SraDanvers retweetledi
milk 🐾
milk 🐾@ykcherries·
pov you’re tucked in bed, ao3 tabs open and no plans the next day
English
31
11.9K
75K
521.9K
SraDanvers retweetledi
Un viaje a Ítaca
Un viaje a Ítaca@unviajeaitaca·
Decir que en la antigüedad griega 🇬🇷 había "hombres homosexuales" es un asincronismo histórico. El término de por sí es moderno y no puede aplicarse a hombres que vivieron hace más de 2300 años. La relación con la mujer era puramente procreativa y sexual. Los hombres tenían entre sí una relación profunda, de intercambio de conocimientos, de pensamientos, lazos afectivos más profundos, sobre todo en el ejército, cuando pasaban meses y años juntos en campañas. En Esparta incluso, este amor profundo por tu compañero fortalecía al conjunto. Sin embargo, no era tan bien vista esta relación entre dos ciudadanos adultos. Había reglas sociales claras para este tipo de relaciones. La única relación aceptada era la del mentor (pederastís) y el menor de edad (eroménos), pero estaba estrictamente regulada y no tiene nada que ver con el término moderno de "pederasta", sino que además, había una formación política y de virtudes dentro de la misma relación y era algo socialmente aceptado. La relación entre hombres en la antigüedad es muy compleja, llena de reglas y códigos estrictos, con una interpretación muchas veces errada de lo que realmente significaba. Además, variaba dependiendo de la polis o reino, y es por eso que muchas veces los atenienses eran criticados por otras polis. Sin embargo, nos han dejado algunas representaciones en vasijas 🏺, lo que significa que era un tema que formaba parte de su vida cotidiana y no había demasiado tabú al respecto.
Un viaje a Ítaca tweet mediaUn viaje a Ítaca tweet media
Español
161
406
4.3K
457.5K