IronForged

This Cambridge Feminist Made a HUGE Mistake… - YouTube youtube.com/watch?v=eoXkjS…

@GrassFedBitcoin @CaminaDrummer4 These morons think we are stupid. The arrogance is these weasels are epic. The period of “experts” is over. We now have AI creating expert consensus. The genius will always be outside the consensus.

@CaminaDrummer4 Now try "BIP-110 doesn't have consensus - also, let's activate BIP-54 with the help of one mining pool"

“The people are retarded, look at how they followed the experts on COVID, so we can’t trust the node runners to run nodes, they should just trust the experts” is one hell of a take.

@GrassFedBitcoin @BitcoinMania___ The age of cowards always precedes the age of change. They just need to be shamed. I’m calling them BTCowards.

Remember all the "omg my grandma missed a hospital appointment because of the trucks" or "we're getting no sleep due to all the honking" Reminds me of Greg and all these losers complaining about some absurd edge case where a UTXO can be generated that's unspendable per the BIP-110 rules. I don't give a sh*t! Bitcoin isn't a network that exists for the purposes of storing junk data on other people's computers.

I watched. Giacomo holds two positions. That BIP-110 is bad and that even if it was good, it's set a negative precedent if it were to activate. The latter he elaborates on with something along the lines of "If BIP-110 activates, that'd mean *people* are in charge of Bitcoin and people are retarded - look at how they acted during COVID!" Yes, unfortunately it is that bad of an argument. Bitcoin is a dynamic system that can and must change at times in order to preserve itself. He does acknowledge this "homeostasis" argument but fails to apply context that can trivially demonstrate its harmlessness. i.e BIP-148 which had no consensus and as I keep saying, we did any way, after which Bitcoin was much better for having had it happen. At the end of the day, Bitcoin is controlled by node runners and you can be scared of populism/democratic uprisings among unwashed masses all you like, but there's no one more appropriate to have that level of influence. It's demonstrably not devs or miners. Many would like it to be - notice the ball-gargling going on with BIP-54. (Because nodes couldn't care less about it while a few devs liaise with a giant miner to get it pushed through. Murch describes this as "genuinely popular" which he contrasts with BIP-110's apparent unpopularity. The latter having only *checks notes* 7000 nodes.) If not nodes....then who? This isn't democracy which is essentially 99% of people pretending to decide what to do with 1% of people's resources getting betrayed and thus voting increasingly vindictively and causing the socialist death-spiral that just ends up gutting the middle class. This is Bitcoiners deciding what happens with *their network* and they have proven remarkably adept at maintaining it. Which isn't surprising - they have skin in the game. Not only that, but there is literally no other defence against 51% attacks (which are trivial in today's landscape), and corrupt/sloppy devs.

@GrassFedBitcoin His arguments are so childish. This is just like the effeminate debate team in high school we crushed when they argued, “we just don’t like it”! He’s a typical feminized male whose time is up. The men are taking over now. Move aside momma’s boy.

@GrassFedBitcoin This is BIP-110!!!!

Soft Fork Activation: Hard Mode - Method: Have support from zero businesses and almost zero miners. Benefit: Reassert pleb dominance. Cost: Spend month getting dunked on by sniveling cowards who wish Bitcoin was controlled by a handful of Mining pools and exchanges.

Bitcoiners, remember that in 2013 March, Bitcoin Core deployed a temporary softfork to limit block sizes to 500kB, expiring 2 months later, with zero notice or miner signalling. It also retroactively invalidated existing blocks.

This is BIP-110 blob:tenor.com/2f3a718e-c5ae-…

blob:tenor.com/2f3a718e-c5ae-…

@NoBickal You’re a nobody that’s done nothing. You’re the coward for not going to 70 to fight.. You’re not a fighter nickel back

I’m not gonna listen to Colby read a teleprompter for 2 min but bottom line is he’s a coward.

@pawprintsdaily3 @Gummy_Hungry AI slop

@stepnoy385394 @DismalDefi @BTC_for_Freedom @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 @giacomozucco @adam3us All these guys suffer from analysis paralysis with zero solutions. Just being warlocks spewing their impotent word salad spells.

@DismalDefi @BTC_for_Freedom @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 knots+bip110 partially solves problems in urgent situations. Criticizing a solution without compelling arguments, leaving Bitcoin defenseless in the face of the enemy, is a familiar, easily recognizable signature. @giacomozucco and @adam3us

If you’re not yet following the large accounts trying to make people realize Bitcoin is money, you should give them a follow: @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 Also, you can search for BIP-110 and follow people who have that in their name.

@DismalDefi @stepnoy385394 @BTC_for_Freedom @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 Complaints with zero solutions……what say you! Analysis paralysis perhaps ?

@stepnoy385394 @BTC_for_Freedom @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @GrassFedBitcoin @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 Core is utterly corrupt and an enemy of Bitcoin. That doesn’t in any way make BIP-110 less retarded.

@BTC_for_Freedom @GrassFedBitcoin @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @hodlonaut @NickSzabo4 Thanks following now all of them.

@hodlonaut @GrassFedBitcoin @adam3us @Pledditor GOOD! That’s exactly how to handle these people. Little cowards with their high school insults. I’d love to see them do it to your face! Lmao! Passive/aggressive crooks.

I’m tired of your insults. I am providing investigative journalism, everything is sourced with screenshots and URLs. I’m doing it because I care about Bitcoin. You sit there arrogantly handwaving honest concerns, throwing insults and ad hominems towards people uncovering extremely alarming behavior and governance by Bitcoin’s reference implementation, while being invested in all kinds of grifts, while not even commenting on fucked up emails connecting you to Epstein’s island. You have fallen completely, Adam. Just sad to see. Now fuck off.

Wouldn't it be nice if "Today's News" was actually news, and not just a repackaged version of your "For You" feed.

@GrassFedBitcoin No more suicidal empathy with the destroyers. They are not to be worked with, but to be defeated categorically.

Start with intention. There are many who just want Bitcoin to turn into a pile of trash. Getting mired in technical discussions about the effectiveness of various anti-abuse measures is pointless with abusers and their apologists. Those who are well motivated already understand the point of BIP-110. Those who aren't will either nit-pick pretending they'd support it with some inconsequential change or oppose it based on a dishonest framing of both what it does and how it does it. It's very difficult to fight to keep Bitcoin on track against people trying to degrade it who only engage in bad-faith discussion. You cannot fix things in collaboration with those who prefer them broken.

@Antunes1 Fucking black fatigue ….. are all Black males got female emotions? Was he in the rag.

An Italian streamer in Japan said “amiga” in Spanish (meaning “friend”) to some fans. A passing black American thought he’d said “Nigga” and aggressively confronted him. “You have five seconds to apologize before I slap you.” The Italian had no idea what was going on.

@ShemekaMichelle @SteveKim323 It’s a dude

@SteveKim323 Right, like do you have a front hole or still your penis?

Uhhhhh....ummmm, I have some questions...

@hodlonaut @GrassFedBitcoin I think this all on purpose to destroy. We need that attitude to deal with them as enemies.

I've spent the last month looking closely at how Bitcoin Core and the network around it has operated the last years. A blatant cultural and philosophical shift. Shocking arrogance and contempt for dissent on display around the OP_RETURN uncap. Opposition was reframed as "harassment", "drama" and "brigading". Consensus was simply declared, in the face of massive controversy and opposition. Bitcoin is imo clearly drifting towards “anything goes if there is a use case out there” relativism. Bitcoin is supposed to be money. That's the mission. Separating money and state. Not being a data layer adapting to the needs of venture-backed projects. Staying neutral while Bitcoin drifts in this direction isn't something I can justify anymore. It feels urgent that something is done to counter it.

@Beautyon_ I fully give my support and backing to BIP110 as a first step to protecting Bitcoin and reversing this dangerous trend