迈克尔

7K posts

迈克尔 banner
迈克尔

迈克尔

@St_Mikeal

Witty wonderer, slicing through illusions in a world of flux.

Katılım Ağustos 2009
4.9K Takip Edilen670 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
迈克尔
迈克尔@St_Mikeal·
Raised to cite, not to see. To uphold, not to understand. To reduce rich cultures to labels. To claim ‘right’ by inheritance alone. And to crucify curiosity.
English
0
1
15
1.4K
迈克尔 retweetledi
☥𝐋𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐱
ppl w adhd do shit like procrastinate for 3 months straight & then in one 24-hr day knock out 3 months of tasks. you either know this life or you don’t lol.
English
32
751
7.9K
91.1K
迈克尔
迈克尔@St_Mikeal·
@TheUnHeard_One a lecturer somewhere needs to update his cross contamination notes.
English
0
0
0
33
The Nikki V.
The Nikki V.@TheUnHeard_One·
OMG!! Ladies…feed your men well!! 😂😂😂
English
618
379
7.9K
51.4K
迈克尔
迈克尔@St_Mikeal·
@am27852 one corner, fresh tyres vs bald ones, race director on ctrl+Z. how?
English
0
0
0
91
Zain
Zain@am27852·
Max Verstappen's last lap at Abu Dhabi which broke millions of Heart should be declared the Greatest Lap of this Century......
English
11
33
417
10.7K
Andreas Kirsch 🇺🇦
I'm speechless at Google signing a deal to use our AI models for classified tasks. Frankly, it is shameful. For HR, I'm not speaking on behalf of Google but in my personal capacity, quoting public information from a well-sourced article of a reputable publication
Andreas Kirsch 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
160
145
964
161.9K
Viktor
Viktor@ViktorKlopp·
How to go down stairs quickly lol
English
1.6K
3.6K
42K
8.9M
CooperBaggs 💰🍞
CooperBaggs 💰🍞@edgaralandough·
If your ADHD ass is creative AF, has a heart of gold, eats the same 5 foods on repeat, and has zero clue how to monetize your brilliant ideas… welcome home! We regulate. We create. We get paid.
English
195
391
6.5K
157.5K
Anton
Anton@largelazymodel·
@irl_danB The AI pleed guilty under oath. IN WRITING. See? It wasn't my fault. Time to sue Anthropic or something.
English
2
0
22
1.3K
dan
dan@irl_danB·
this post is sad and enlightening just an absolutely wild level of misunderstanding about these systems, even from technical people using them in production I’m at a loss for how to remedy this gap as urgently and as quickly as needed
dan tweet mediadan tweet mediadan tweet mediadan tweet media
JER@lifeof_jer

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
90
36
634
133.6K
迈克尔
迈克尔@St_Mikeal·
@atmoio right, and i guess FSD is just Autopilot with extra loops.
English
0
0
0
42
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
The greatest con of the decade was calling autocomplete “AI”. The second greatest is calling autocomplete-in-a-loop an “agent”.
JER@lifeof_jer

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
90
184
1.9K
134.3K
Air Katakana
Air Katakana@airkatakana·
we are sorry that an issue with our inference pipeline has caused robots powered by claude to kill their owners, leading to several hundreds of deaths to make up for this error, we are resetting rate limits for the bereaved families
English
6
6
121
3K
MERICA MEMED
MERICA MEMED@Mericamemed·
Never in a million years would I sit down
English
492
191
7.3K
367.9K
Christophy Barth
Christophy Barth@ChristophyBarth·
@RembrandtNext @drekkz @matrixbt Note that everything, completely everything needs a guide (at least at first). Note that to run certain software, there are things you should know, depending on the configurations. Call it manual for physical stuff, in software, it's called README Which literally says "Read Me"
English
1
0
2
126
Matrix
Matrix@matrixbt·
Matrix tweet media
ZXX
254
416
10.3K
1M
poof
poof@poof_eth·
Had a Jane Street interview in 2013 that still bothers me. It was my 6th round. Final interview. The guy walks in carrying no laptop, no notebook, just a cold brew and what I later realized was a single IKEA tea candle. He writes on the whiteboard: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $150 candles: $3,600 family: dying Then he turns around and says, “Optimize.” I laughed because I thought it was a culture-fit bit. He did not laugh. So I said, “Well, obviously you spend less on candles.” He says, “Assume candles are non-discretionary.” Okay. I start building a model. Basic constraint satisfaction. Family survival as a soft penalty. Candles as a state variable. Maybe there’s an arbitrage where you buy wholesale paraffin and convert the $3,600 line item into inventory. He stops me. “You’re thinking like a consultant.” That’s when I knew I was in trouble. He says, “Give me a bid-ask on family dying.” I say, “What?” He says, “You’re long candles, short family. Where do you make markets?” I try to recover. I say the real issue is liquidity: rent and utilities are fixed, food is elastic, candles are emotionally inelastic. Therefore the optimal strategy is to securitize future candle enjoyment and borrow against it. He nods for the first time. Then he asks, “What time do you sell the candles?” I say, “Whenever the market is liquid?” He says, “Be more specific.” I say, “Uh… 10 a.m. Eastern?” For the first time, he smiles. He goes, “Every day?” I say, “Every day.” He says, “In size?” I say, “In size.” He says, “And what do we call that?” I say, “Market manipulation?” The room gets very quiet. He looks disappointed and writes something down. “No. We call it providing liquidity to candle ETFs during the U.S. cash open.” I try to save it. “Right. Of course. The family isn’t dying because we underfunded them. They’re just experiencing temporary price discovery.” He nods again. Then he points back at the board. I had missed it. The utility bill was $150, but candles provide light. You can zero out utilities. I update the budget: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $0 candles: $3,750 family: still dying, but now in a more capital-efficient way He says, “How confident are you?” I say, “0.95.” He smiles and circles candles. “0.95 huh?” Then he asks me to estimate how many leveraged longs get liquidated if we dump $3,750 of candles at 10:00:01 every morning for 90 consecutive trading days. Needless to say I did not get the offer.
Deedy@deedydas

Jane Street made ~$40B in 2025 with 3,500 employees, a ~2x from the year before. At ~65-70% profit margin, that's $8M profit / employee, the highest for a 1000+ ppl company. High-frequency trading continues to be the most efficient money making engine. I want to share an old story about my Jane Street interview in 2014. Jane Street was known for hiring a lot of math, physics and CS olympiad winners from top universities and putting them through many rounds - including, for trading roles, a gauntlet of mental math. It was my 6th interview and my final round and I recall being asked "What is the next day after today in DD/MM/YYYY where all the digits are unique?" They'd toy with you and say "You can use a pencil and paper, if you want" but you knew that was an instant no. Painstakingly and as quickly as I could, I came to an answer. "How confident are you that this is correct on a 0-1 probability scale?" the interviewer said. "0.95", I blurted out, not fully knowing how to answer that. "Are you sure?" After thinking harder for a few more seconds, I realized I could've flipped the digits around to get a closer date. I gave the interviewer my answer. It was correct. "0.95 huh?" he chuckled. That's when I knew I failed. Note: fwiw, other companies that come close in efficiency are - Tether ($90M+ profit/emp) - Hyperliquid ($80M+ profit/emp) and on revenue: - Valve ($50M/emp) - OnlyFans ($37M/emp) - Craigslist ($14M/emp) - Anthropic ($12M/emp, run rate) - OpenAI ($8M/emp, run rate) For comparison, Nvidia is very efficient at scale and is $4.4M/emp.

English
369
963
15.4K
3.5M
迈克尔
迈克尔@St_Mikeal·
@leerob @hnshah meanwhile cc is insistent on saying. “this does not sound like coding…” 😅
English
0
0
1
71
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
It wasn’t obvious to me one year ago that an excellent coding agent would also be the path to a general agent for all knowledge work. But now it makes a lot of sense. I’m interested to see where AI is at next year and what seems obvious then in retrospect.
English
72
28
764
137K
chepkemoi♡
chepkemoi♡@Chep1_·
BBC really said “video not available in your location” while the athlete is literally from here😭😭😭
English
46
2.9K
17.8K
140.8K
SollyMalatsi
SollyMalatsi@SollyMalatsi·
Statement on the integrity of the Draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy Following revelations that the Draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy published for public comment contains various fictitious sources in its reference list, we initiated internal questions which have now confirmed that this was the case. This failure is not a mere technical issue but has compromised the integrity and credibility of the draft policy. As such, I am withdrawing the Draft National Artificial intelligence Policy. South Africans deserve better. The Department of Communications and Digital Technologies did not deliver on the standard that is acceptable for an institution entrusted with the role to lead South Africa ‘s digital policy environment. The most plausible explanation is that AI-generated citations were included without proper verification. This should not have happened. In fact, this unacceptable lapse proves why vigilant human oversight over the use of artificial intelligence is critical. It’s a lesson we take with humility. I want to reassure the country that we are treating this matter with the gravity it deserves. There will be consequence management for those responsible for drafting and quality assurance. End.
English
163
154
309
95.1K
迈克尔 retweetledi
gaut
gaut@0xgaut·
You’re telling me a guy Ran a 1:59:41 marathon On his debut with the marathon distance And finishes second
English
252
4K
123.2K
3.3M