Stanley Labanowski

235 posts

Stanley Labanowski banner
Stanley Labanowski

Stanley Labanowski

@StanLabanowski

Dallas, Texas; Chapter 11 USA Katılım Mart 2026
139 Takip Edilen427 Takipçiler
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
The U.S. is going to withdraw because it has no viable options left. It will hand the baton to Israel, if they even want it, and leave the rest of the world to clean up the mess in the Strait. You can blather all you like, but if Trump had any cards to play, he would have played them.
English
0
0
0
35
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
DEAL OR NO DEAL When we suddenly hit the brakes and called off the planned military operation against the Iranian regime, it was clear that something was going on.  We gave the regime 2-3 days to come to some arrangement that presumably includes no nukes.  What does no nukes mean?  Are their scientists going to forget what they developed?  How long can we keep that in a box?  What happens to the enriched uranium? We are told: 1. they have enough to make 10 bombs in 11 days, and 2. that it takes a matter of weeks to further enrich uranium from 60% to 90% nuclear grade.  What about the plutonium, which no one is talking about?  And the ballistic missiles, that were destroying targets throughout the Middle East?  And the range of those missiles, which can now hit Europe?  We didn't even know how far those missiles could reach.  I guess all of this will change?  The Iranian regime that kicked out inspectors, hid their activities, and violated every single agreement it ever signed, will have changed because of our military actions?  Honestly, does this act or sound like a regime that is defeated or cares about death?  For some reason, the West cannot get its collective head around the fact that the Iranian regime's mindset is not one of mutual existence.  It is a religious, extremist, fundamentalist cult that insists on conquering or destroying all those who do not bend to its ideology. They have told us this.  They have written this.  They preach this.  It is in their books, pamphlets, sermons, etc.  It is a revolution without borders, not merely one nation among others.  Haven't we learned this by now?  Many Americans have been killed during the last 47-years as a result of the regime's ambitions.  My greatest concern has always been enforcement, which has not been discussed much even after all of this time.  If there is a deal, whatever deal it is, perhaps the greatest deal in the history of deals, again, the regime cheats, lies, and hides what it is doing.  Our intel and satellites simply cannot catch all of it.  And if we find violations, then what?  "Well, we'll hit them again, Mark."  Is that what we did before Trump?  Does anyone believe that's what we will do after Trump?  Is that what a Gavin Newsom or Kamala Harris or the rest of the Democrats would do if one of them became president?  Heck, even Republican presidents did not act.  For crying out loud, look at all the noise, the appeasers, the pacificists, the isolationists, etc.  These are loud movements in our politics and government.  And look at the reaction to the temporary increase in a gallon of gasoline.  Would we have the will even a few years from now? And what of Hezbollah, still a potent terrorist force?  And what of Hamas?  The Iranian regime will promise not to support them?  My response: is the Brooklyn Bridge still for sale?  And how do we stop the regime if it funds them anyway?  What will we do?  And the Iranian people?  What of them?  "They should rise up," it is said.  Well, they did.  Without arms.  And they paid a horrendous price and still are.  I can only imagine what more would be done to them. Of course, the Europeans will be useless, as they are now.  Even with detente with China and something like it with Russia, they still will provide support to the Iranian regime.  So will North Korea.  We have no control over their sabotage of any deal.  This all must be considered. And the Democrats, always desperate for a political opportunity, will ask rhetorically, "why did we go to war," "this is Obama 2.0," "we wasted billions for nothing," "Trump is a TACO," and on and on.  I can hear it now.  The truth won't matter.  The spin will be constant.  Of course, if the Democrats had their way, the Iranian regime would already have nuclear weapons.  But none of that will matter.  This could be very damaging for the mid-term elections, despite all the demands for "off-ramps."  Yet, the problem is the regime itself, is it not?  How do we contain it if it survives? To be absolutely clear, I have no inside information. In fact, as far as I know at the end of another 2-3 days of negotiations military action against the regime will resume.  But it's very important to think about these issues and much more.
English
833
1.7K
5.1K
199.5K
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortor·
From everything I’m hearing out of Kentucky, this Massie versus Gallrein race is INSANELY close. Literally a coin-toss. Wow.
English
326
154
1.8K
117.6K
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
If Donald Trump could have achieved a military victory in this conflict, he would have done so by now. We should designate this as Israel's war, hand them the baton, and withdraw our troops and equipment. If Israel wishes to utilize airstrikes and deploy the IDF for regime change, let them do so. Allow Miriam, Fine, Loomer, Levin, et.al. to volunteer for Israel so they can make a personal contribution to the Israeli war effort.
English
0
0
1
43
Lindsey Graham
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC·
I hope and expect after months of negotiating with the Iranians that the Trump administration will reject any effort by Iran to yet again delay negotiations. The regime has had months to reach a deal, but it seems apparent to me they are playing games. It is my preference for a diplomatic solution, but Iran’s oldest trick in the book is delay, delay, delay. As to any potential deal, I look forward to reviewing it in the Senate.
English
949
839
3.7K
174K
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
@realDonaldTrump You are running this country into the ground. The US is hopelessly involved in war with Iran because Israel has you by the cahones. Stop focusing on Massie and focus on your job. Have a Taco on TACO Tuesday. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
English
0
0
0
21
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Horrible Congressman Thomas Massie put out an old Endorsement, from many years ago, of him by me long before I found out that he was the Worst Congressman in the History of our Country. I endorsed Ed Gallrein, a true American Patriot, which Massie knows full well, so the statement that he put out is fraudulent, just like HE is fraudulent. WITHDRAW YOUR FAKE STATEMENT, MASSIE, RIGHT NOW! President DONALD J. TRUMP
English
35.2K
23.9K
161.1K
32.9M
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter@AnnCoulter·
Is there anyone with a room temperature I.Q. opposing Massie? Heritage Foundation Scorecard: Massie gets a 96% score, compared to the average Republican score of 89%.
Ann Coulter tweet media
English
475
297
2.7K
61.5K
Senator John Cornyn
Senator John Cornyn@JohnCornyn·
I have worked closely with President Trump through both of his Presidential terms and voted with him more than 99% of the time. He has consistently called me a friend in this race. It is now time for Texas Republican voters to decide if they want a strong nominee to help our GOP candidates down ballot and defeat Talarico in November, or a weak nominee who jeopardizes everything we care about. I trust the Republican voters of Texas.
English
7K
300
2.4K
2.2M
Andrew Desiderio
Andrew Desiderio@AndrewDesiderio·
Susan Collins says she “doesn’t understand” Trump’s decision to back Paxton, who she called “ethically challenged.”
English
193
166
1.2K
465.8K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
President Trump did a very good job at reading the base in Texas. I’m glad the base prevailed over consultants.
English
205
1.3K
12.3K
80.5K
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
@PAddis92731 @LauraLoomer He's connected. Lutnick, Melania, himself, probably other people he knows. I don't know about him per se. But, where there's smoke...
English
2
0
0
25
Pamela Addis
Pamela Addis@PAddis92731·
@StanLabanowski @LauraLoomer Thanks for the tip. I will definitely look into it. Do you think Trump is trying to protect Melania or worried about his presidency
English
1
0
0
33
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Dismal turnout for Massie at the polls in Kentucky right now.
English
1.6K
1.2K
11.3K
380.5K
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
@KenPaxtonTX That is a huge surprise. I would have bet the ranch he would have TACO'd and endorsed Cornyn.
English
3
1
9
1.6K
Attorney General Ken Paxton
I am incredibly honored to have President Trump’s COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT.   No one has ever fought harder for the American people than President Trump, and I look forward to championing his America First agenda in the Senate!   Texas, get out and VOTE!
Attorney General Ken Paxton tweet mediaAttorney General Ken Paxton tweet media
English
3.1K
16.9K
67.1K
1M
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
@PAddis92731 @LauraLoomer If you feel like digging, look into Melania and her ex best friend Amanda Ungaro, and how Amanda Ungaro was put in detention and sent back to Brazil. Then you will understand Melania's recent press conference. Lots of rabbit holes. There is a reason Trump want Epstein buried.
English
1
0
1
63
Pamela Addis
Pamela Addis@PAddis92731·
@StanLabanowski @LauraLoomer What year was this. Everyone knows the elite run in the same circles. Trump alerted and worked with the FBI and had Epstein arrested for what he was involved in. If they only knew the big picture. Up until his death, Epstein was trying to have sex offender erased from his record
English
1
0
0
19
MÁXIMO
MÁXIMO@NNRXMM·
@StanLabanowski @Jason Partially. Literature (William et al.) points at viable, yet brutal return to Earth at standard Mars trip duration. Native-born would be physiologically impossible. Must be done.
English
1
0
0
14
Pamela Addis
Pamela Addis@PAddis92731·
@StanLabanowski @LauraLoomer People don’t realize it goes deeper than demonic pedophilia. It involves spy’s and international security. Epstein was definitely an evil man, but was working for far superior evil organizations. Trump helped authorities with Epstein’s arrest in the early 2000’s. Angered Epstein
English
1
0
0
67
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
Massie has consistently voted for term limits legislation; supporting term limits as policy doesn't obligate someone to unilaterally resign while opponents who reject the rule keep their seats. "Believe all women" was always a slogan, not a due-process standard, and unverified allegations don't override the actual voting record people are evaluating him on. If "principled" means anything, it's voting your conscience against your own party, which is precisely why leadership wants him out and is suddenly so interested in his ouster. And, it is still your right to prioritize pedophilia.
English
2
0
0
43
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec·
Who do you think will win tonight, Massie or Gallrein?
English
1.1K
19
321
469K
olivia dasovic
olivia dasovic@oliviadasovic·
Can someone rationally explain why they hate thomas massie so much?
English
2.7K
116
2.4K
294.3K
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
The multiplanetary pitch is a scam. Humans living in low-gravity environments such as the moon or Mars past 1-2 years cannot safely return to Earth: their skeletons, cardiovascular systems, and muscles will not survive reentry into Earth's gravity and life thereafter. Look it up with AI, or find Richard Feynman's lectures on the topic.
English
1
0
1
33
MÁXIMO
MÁXIMO@NNRXMM·
@Jason This is a major generalization. A great chunk of Gen Z understands we'll become the FIRST EVER generation to become multiplanetary and beat death thanks to AI.
English
2
0
3
461
Stanley Labanowski
Stanley Labanowski@StanLabanowski·
@Jason They can take their ire to the polls and pick different politicians. Electing politicians like AOC and Bernie can alter the trajectory of AI.
English
0
0
0
52