Ste May

8.2K posts

Ste May banner
Ste May

Ste May

@SteGMay

All I can say is that my life is pretty plain

Isle of Man 🇮🇲 Katılım Mart 2011
1.5K Takip Edilen362 Takipçiler
Ste May
Ste May@SteGMay·
You never hear about BritBox these days. Suspect it was just a way to get Yanks to pay for British telly.
English
0
0
0
31
Ste May
Ste May@SteGMay·
Least funny thing on TV all year.
sᴜᴘᴇʀ ᴛᴠ@superTV247

RATINGS: #ComicRelief 2026 pulled JUST 2 million viewers for its BBC One telethon last night, the events lowest ever viewership: 2026 - 2m 2025 - 2.6m 2024 - 3.7m 2023 - 2.9m 2022 - 3.5m 2021 - 4.5m 2019 - 5.8m 2017 - 6.3m 2015 - 8.4m 2013 - 10.3m 2011 - 10.2m

English
0
0
0
62
Ste May retweetledi
𝕷𝖚𝖈𝖎𝖋𝖊𝖗
𝕷𝖚𝖈𝖎𝖋𝖊𝖗@LucifersTweetz·
70 and 80 year old people are generally unemployable due to physical and mental decline but for some reason we allow them to run the entire fucking country.
English
928
38.3K
248.1K
3M
Ste May retweetledi
Mark Stephenson
Mark Stephenson@markstephenson2·
If the FA apply a points deduction proportionate to Luton's 10-point deduction to Chelsea (based on Luton's payments to agents being £160,00 and Chelsea's being £47.5m), then Chelsea will be deducted 2,970 points.
Henry Winter@henrywinter

Good result for Chelsea: club fined only £10m and given a suspended transfer ban after Premier League found 36 separate undisclosed payments totalling £47.5m made “to 12 persons or entities on behalf of the club”. Lenient sanctions. No sporting sanctions. Yet these are serious offences, as the sanction agreement between the PL and Chelsea makes clear, stating “they were not only obvious and deliberate breaches of the rules but also because they involved deception and concealment in relation to financial matters”. Yet no points deductions. Just a manageable (if record) fine and a “suspended one-year first-team player transfer ban (suspended for two years)”. Surely they gained a sporting advantage by recruiting such players? So surely a sporting sanction should be in order? And where's the consistency? In 2008, Luton Town received a 10-point deduction for irregularities in dealing with agents (nb from FA). There still could be some further sanctions by the FA following its "ongoing investigation". PL points to mitigating factors: current owners Clearlake/Todd Boehly in May 2022 voluntarily self-reported potential historical breaches from the Roman Abramovich era. Club co-operated extensively and helped provide (with others) 10,000 documents for PL investigation. PL established “that between 2011 and 2018, undisclosed payments by third parties associated with the club were made to players, unregistered agents and other third parties”. Payments related to the purchases of players including Eden Hazard, Willian, Samuel Eto’o, David Luiz, Andre Schurrle and Nemanja Matic - there is no suggestion any were aware of the illicit payments. The detailed work of the investigators – and level of Clearlake’s co-operation – is impressive. The sanctions less so. It is a legitimate debate: should a club be punished for offences under a previous owner? Yes, most fans of other clubs would scream. It's a deterrent. And the value of those players' contribution and subsequent sales arguably still benefits the club. PL also investigated “potential breaches of the Premier League’s Youth Development Rules, committed by a former senior employee, relating to the club’s registration of Academy players between 2019 and 2022”. Again, self-reported by the club, this time in 2025. Chelsea punished with £750,000 fine and immediate nine-month ban from registering academy players from PL and EFL clubs. #CFC

English
51
1.1K
8.9K
663.7K
Ste May retweetledi
Jonathan Ridgway
Jonathan Ridgway@AVFCJono·
Before the Russian oligarch money, Chelsea hadn't won the league since the 1950's. They've cheated their way into a position of dominance and now the rules sustain their position. Even when they cheat, it's a slap on the wrist of no real consequence. What a joke.
English
44
323
2.1K
45.4K
Ste May retweetledi
Brian Viner
Brian Viner@vinerbrian·
The message from the @premierleague couldn’t be clearer. If we think you’re an important part of our brand, we’ll only pretend to punish you. But if you’re Everton or Forest, guilty of a much lesser rules breach, we will try to relegate you. Transparent and indefensible
English
84
779
4.9K
154K
Ste May retweetledi
Citizens of Suburbia
Citizens of Suburbia@CitizenSuburbia·
Yes. Those were the days when an independent regulator loomed & the PL had to look like it was cracking down & imposing financial sustainability. Now that the regulator is in place, the PL can go back to its previous approach - remember its the *members* who vote on the rules. The PL appoints a team to prosecute rule breaches. One suspects a cabal of big clubs then exercised behind the scenes influence on the PL's prosecuting strategy. Remember PSR was introduced in 2016 and things were plain sailing for SIX YEARS until Everton were the first to be hit in 2022. Why? Well, the Crouch Report was published in November 2021 and recommended an Independent Football Regulator with broad powers. Member clubs - notably the cabal pulling the strings of the PL - wanted to avoid being regulated from the outside & Everton (and then Forest) are hit hard to show that there is no need for a regulator. Subsequently, Football Governance Bill is passed and regulator lacks the "teeth" to interfere in PL disciplinary matters. So we are back to the PL - with big member clubs pulling the strings - punishing (or not) clubs on a club badge by club badge basis So I would not bank this as any kind of precedent for future rule breaches. IE there could be harsh penalties if you have the wrong club badge. This is just like VAR, but applied to off the field rule breaches.
Citizens of Suburbia tweet media
Tony Scott@Tony_Scott11

Remember those days when football clubs were instantly deducted 10 points in the Premier League?

English
6
28
93
7.8K
Ste May retweetledi
Ste May
Ste May@SteGMay·
Easier to quit smoking than to stop doing a double space after a full stop.
English
0
0
0
20