Steal Sharpens Steel

3.7K posts

Steal Sharpens Steel

Steal Sharpens Steel

@StealTempered

Christian. Constitutionalist. Patriot. Marine. White Hat Warrior. Pilot. INTJ. Expert Marksman. Digital Forensics and Cybersecurity SME.

Katılım Aralık 2020
279 Takip Edilen78 Takipçiler
ThePhilliesPod
ThePhilliesPod@ThePhilliesPod·
@DavisBakerTV OBR may have a different ruling, but in NCAA this is a lodged ball and is a ground rule double.
English
2
0
2
1.4K
Davis Baker
Davis Baker@DavisBakerTV·
Don't think I've ever seen this before in baseball. Biscuits outfielder Austin Overn rips a ball down the right field line, right fielder slides over the ball, ball gets lodged into the ground so deep it turns into an inside-the-park home run. Then it takes MULTIPLE players to try and dig it out, which lasted minutes. @wsfa12sports @wsfa12news @BiscuitBaseball
English
94
307
4.5K
671.9K
Eric Schwalm
Eric Schwalm@Schwalm5132·
CIF - Commander's In-extremis Force CRF - Crisis Response Force HTD - Hard Target Defeat CTAC - Critical Threats Advisory Company Depended on where we were in the world, who we were serving under, and what our mission was at the time. Also, Year dependent. Each Group has only ONE COMPANY of them.....if you served in "That Group" you know I'm talking about you!
English
10
2
48
1.5K
Manny Salazar
Manny Salazar@SetantaADV·
I just saw a YouTube green hat wearing guy talking about a CIF Team (I’ve always heard it pronounced as sif “, but he called it the “CRIF”. Has anyone ever heard it pronounced that way? Seems pretty bizarre to me, but maybe I’ve been wrong for decades?
English
14
0
34
3.9K
The Buddy CSM
The Buddy CSM@TheBuddyCSM·
“That one, to the right…zoom in…a little more…keep it steady…Got’em! Open ejection port cover! WooOooooOoo!!! Have him and his team leader come see me. We gonna learn today!”
The Buddy CSM tweet media
English
14
7
161
2.8K
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
If President Trump — who is the leader of the Republican Party & an immensely powerful voice — endorsed anyone other than Ken Paxton for the Texas Senate runoff, would you still vote for Ken Paxton? (I want people to see publicly what you have to say.) 🗓️ Tuesday, May 26th
English
4K
1.5K
8K
134.9K
Happy Captain
Happy Captain@EODHappyCaptain·
There are very few times where it is appropriate to try and put your hands on another Soldier. An example would be live ranges where there is a safety violation that could injury or kill someone. During a physical fitness test because you are angry is not one of those times.
English
49
31
985
25.8K
Steal Sharpens Steel
Steal Sharpens Steel@StealTempered·
@HarryMacD @Vermeullarmine Slightly ambiguous without context, but I read it to mean the doctrine of standing—the constitutional and procedural rules that determine whether a party has the right to bring a lawsuit. Context unnecessary for you, but may benefit others who scroll through. 🤠
English
1
0
2
1.1K
Harry MacDougald
Harry MacDougald@HarryMacD·
Standing law is the most dishonest doctrinal septic tank in the entire corpus of American law.
English
14
6
102
16.6K
Mossad Commentary
Mossad Commentary@MOSSADil·
🚨 BREAKING: Earthquake reported in Tehran That’s…an ominous signal.
Mossad Commentary tweet media
English
97
293
1.8K
106.5K
Paula Scanlan
Paula Scanlan@PaulaYScanlan·
never trust a chinese woman named eileen… just saying
English
23
3
214
6.7K
Steal Sharpens Steel
Steal Sharpens Steel@StealTempered·
@billysandytodd Plaintiffs ready to file a lawsuit if the state moves forward with the 2023 6-1 district mapping? It appears to be unconstitutional, as it also created a racially gerrymandered district, based upon the 2025 federal court case and its Arlington heights assessment.
English
0
0
3
68
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸@Arkypatriot·
I finally tried Whataburger in Texas after hearing people talk about it like it was a religious experience. And I’m just gonna say it… I still don’t see what the big deal is. It was fine. Not bad. Not life-changing. Nobody’s ancestors whispered “welcome home” when I took a bite. So all of you who love it please explain yourselves.
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
2.1K
55
1.4K
334.7K
SCOTUS Wire
SCOTUS Wire@scotus_wire·
🚨 Alabama asks the Supreme Court to restore its 2023 congressional map that was struck down under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment.
SCOTUS Wire tweet mediaSCOTUS Wire tweet media
English
20
242
1.4K
78.6K
Steal Sharpens Steel retweetledi
Garland Favorito
Garland Favorito@VoterGa·
Press Release: Fulton Judge Ignores Law in Allowing Raffensperger to Reject Challenge to His Own Candidacy ATLANTA, GA. MAY 8, 2026 – A Fulton County Superior Court judge issued an order Monday upholding Secretary of State (SOS) Brad Raffensperger’s refusal to transfer a gubernatorial candidacy challenge against him to an administrative court as required by Georgia law. Any elector may send a candidacy challenge to the SOS who is mandated to send all challenges to the administrative court system for a hearing as per O.C.G.A. §21-2-5(b). Northwest Georgia residents, Brandyn James and Harvey Wysong, filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus seeking the court to force the SOS to comply with the law by transferring their challenge, which is based on an approved Georgia Republican Party resolution stating: “It is resolved that the Georgia Republican Party shall not qualify, allow to be qualified, or take any action to allow Brad Raffensperger to qualify as a Republican or run for any elected office unless and until a GAGOP Convention removes this restriction;” [pg 10] But SOS General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, rejected their challenge stating: “…we have determined that the information provided does not meet the criteria required to constitute a valid candidate challenge.” [pg 25] There is no provision under Georgia law for the SOS, to make any such determination as to the validity of a candidate challenge, especially one that challenges his own candidacy. Judge Belinda Edwards’ order, confirmed a May 1 hearing decision by finding: “Petitioners lack a clear legal right to an administrative hearing”. [pg 2] Georgia law provides no clear authority for a Superior Court to make such a determination before a challenge is heard since that is the jurisdiction of an administrative law judge. The Petitioners entered an appeal for the Mandamus directly to the Georgia Supreme Court on Tuesday after being denied the normal challenge process. Attorney Jake Medhoff said: "We respectfully disagree with the trial court's decision and are confident that the Supreme Court of Georgia will vindicate both our clients and the plain language of the statute." The case has incurred a near total black out by local news media despite a massive conflict of interest in allowing the SOS to determine whether or not he is properly qualified to run for Governor. Meanwhile, Raffensperger continues to collect Republican primary votes even though the Republican Party passed a resolution prohibiting him to run as a Republican.
Garland Favorito tweet media
English
70
675
932
26K
Steal Sharpens Steel retweetledi
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
See -- the VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION says that district maps can only be proposed and changed in accordance with a specific procedure. The VA Legis decided the Constitution didn't apply to it, and changed the map in the manner it saw fit. The VA Supreme Court reminded them that the Constitution applied to them.
Tim Anderson@AssocAnderson

Many of you on the left are commenting that the decision was 4-3, as if the math somehow changes what actually happened. Four Justices on the Virginia Supreme Court canceled the votes of every person who voted “yes.” All the money. All the effort. Cancelled. I know it is easy to blame the Court for what happened today. But here is the absolute truth: The Virginia Democrats broke the law. They did it openly, blatantly, and with complete disregard for the consequences. They believed they were untouchable because they controlled the executive branch and the legislative branch. The acted like mob bosses with no accountability. But in a government with checks and balances - the Courts always have the final say. Your vote was not canceled because four justices woke up and decided to invalidate an election. Your vote was canceled because Virginia Democrats put the Court in a position where the law required intervention. You should absolutely be angry that your vote was taken away. But be angry at the people who ignored the law and caused this mess in the first place. If Democrats had simply followed the Constitution and done it correctly, none of this would have happened.

English
39
528
2.5K
78.3K
Steal Sharpens Steel retweetledi
Gregory Kennedy
Gregory Kennedy@gregorykennedy·
Dave: “Hello, caller, you are on the air.” Caller: “I don’t think billionaires create value.” Dave: “Okay. What do you mean by that?” Caller: “Nobody can earn a billion dollars ethically.” Dave: “Alright. What do you do for a living?” Caller: “Well, before this, I was a bartender.” Dave: “Nothing wrong with bartending. Honest work.” Caller: “Right.” Dave: “And now?” Caller: “I work in government.” Dave: “Okay. So let me get this straight. You're saying Elon Musk, who helped build PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink, has made innovations like online payments, electric cars, rockets, and satellite internet possible, didn't earn his way to being a billionaire?" Caller: “None of that justifies being a billionaire.” Dave: “Well, sure sounds like value got created somewhere along the line.” Caller: “I disagree.” Dave: “What exactly did you build?” Caller: “I advocate for economic justice.” Dave: “No ma’am, I mean actual products.” Caller: “…” Dave: “You’re telling me the guy catching rockets mid-air created less value than a person who used to serve mojitos and now votes on spending his tax dollars?” Caller: “That’s unfair.” Dave: “What’s unfair is pretending markets are imaginary while cashing a government paycheck funded by the businesses you claim don’t create value.” Caller: “I’m actually a congresswoman.” Dave: “Oh Lord. Of course!"
Gregory Kennedy tweet media
Breitbart News@BreitbartNews

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: You can't earn a billion dollars. Ilana Glazer: That's right. AOC: You just can't earn that. Glazer: That's exactly correct. AOC: You can get market power. You can break rules. You can do all sorts of things. You can abuse labor laws. Glazer: Yup. AOC: You can pay people less than what they're worth. Glazer: Yup. AOC: But you can't earn that, right? Glazer: That's right. AOC: And so you have to create a myth that -- since you didn't earn that, you have to create a myth of earning it.

English
500
7.6K
61.5K
7.8M
Planet Of Memes
Planet Of Memes@PlanetOfMemes·
That's quite a large cone you have there, Elon.
Planet Of Memes tweet media
English
35
31
236
9.1K