

Stealth Trading
2.6K posts

@Stealth_Trader1
Options Trader/Investor - Working on doing this for a living - Not Financial Advice.










$EOSE A few thoughts. 1. If this new design drives down cycle time, increases throughput, supports redundancies etc., why is it still rated at 2 GWh/yr? 2. If they ramp to a combined 4GWh/yr run rate by EOY, in no world can they make only $300-400m. How do you reconcile this? Significant idle time in one or more lines from time to time? 3. When will the company be requesting an approximately $117M disbursement for this line? 4. Is the company still planning on following through on the DOE Project Amaze? Lines 3 and 4 would need substantial completion by December to qualify for reimbursement. That's $84M of efficient capital on the table. Is the plan that between the improved throughput of Lines 2 and 3, Line 4 is not needed to complete Project Amaze? Go back to question #1.


Battery Line 2 has successfully completed Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT), validating system performance under real operating conditions ahead of installation! This milestone reflects the disciplined, process-driven execution required to scale advanced manufacturing. Line 2 is purpose-built to expand overall production capacity and incorporates key enhancements, including a single-piece flow configuration, increased process redundancy, and advanced pick-and-place gantry systems to drive faster cycle times and improved efficiency. These design improvements, along with the Thorn Hill building layout, are expected to translate into meaningful gains: 1. Raw material travel reduced from approximately 2.09 miles to 0.29 miles —86% reduction 2. Line length reduced from approximately 478 ft (Line 1) to 288 ft (Line 2) — 40% reduction Next stop: installation at the Eos Thorn Hill facility.








Tesla SUV incoming??







$EOSE so obvious $3.70 is in play. Thats the level you "back up the truck", imo. Not financial advice, do your own research.
