Guinea Pig

39.5K posts

Guinea Pig

Guinea Pig

@SteamiCat

Katılım Eylül 2016
421 Takip Edilen204 Takipçiler
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Intelligence bothers you? No, I am far from a bot. Just discussed this with a reporter from the LA times. Funny thing - when you have some expertise in the field we actually have receipts - and the other funny thing - you didn't read a one but you did accuse me of being a bot. Typica.
lilithhecatex@HekateMagik

@KhonWillia3446 @drterrysimpson You have to be a bot.

English
6
2
22
1.5K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Guinea Pig retweetledi
The Movie Monster
The Movie Monster@Pauline98476699·
A black Australian NBA player? Ben Simmons claimed the casino racially profiled him as he was denied entry — his white friend was allowed in msn.com/en-us/sports/n…
English
0
1
1
175
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Yes — MCAT scores correlate with certain academic outcomes, including some component of attrition risk. Nobody honest denies that. Standardized metrics do help identify students likely to navigate cognitively demanding training systems. But notice what quietly happens in this conversation: “predicts some attrition risk” becomes “therefore identifies the best future physicians.” Those are not remotely identical claims. And importantly, even in the paper being discussed, adjusting for MCAT only partially explains the disparity. Which means the world remains more complicated than “lower scores = incapable.” As surgeons and physicians, we should also be cautious about fetishizing educational survival itself as the ultimate measure of merit. Medical training systems are themselves products of history, culture, economics, institutional support, mentorship, stress tolerance, and sometimes outright dysfunction. The attrition discussion is important. But it still does not establish the sweeping claim many people want to make online — namely that small differences in standardized test scores among highly qualified applicants determine physician quality. Because medicine eventually exposes dimensions no entrance exam captures: judgment under uncertainty, communication, resilience, leadership, professionalism, composure in crisis, operative decision-making, empathy, and the ability to care for terrified human beings when things go catastrophically wrong. The body does not care about your MCAT percentile when the bleeding starts.
Anish Koka, MD@anish_koka

TL/DR: Underrepresented minorities have attrition rates for medical school that are 2-5x higher than whites/asians. Adjusting for MCAT scores cuts the attrition rate disparity in half. So perhaps MCAT scores aren’t as useless as ppl claim.

English
12
11
72
3.1K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
The Freedmen's Bureau
The Freedmen's Bureau@AmericaFreedmen·
As we work to file a class action lawsuit, we will be naming the Asian U.S DOJ & other Asian led groups that descend from immigrants who are targeting foundational Americans. We will call out bias as we name/list all Asian networks that these Asian groups have not targeted.
The Freedmen's Bureau@AmericaFreedmen

Asians targeting only Black systems and networks is simply racism. They are mad that there are Black people that are as smart as them because most of them come from regions where they mistreat darker skin people.

English
1
5
15
617
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Odd this non-physician thinks that we "give your group" an edge. We understand, based on years of research, how MCAT and GPA get you in the door. But we review letters, do a rigorous interview, and ask questions of people who know the candidates. We want successful physicians and we have studied this extensively. This person who calls themselves some pop culture person, doesn't. Score driven does not make a good doctor and if they would bother to read the literature instead of pontificate about something they don't know, they would see that. I've posted that before - this person won't read it. Which is the difference between a physician and this person. The physicians who have interacted with me have looked over the papers I posted -this person probably won't. She would not make it into medical school
𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑠, 𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠, 𝑃𝑜𝑝 𝐶𝑢𝑙@policywishes

If you need a school to use 'subjective' metrics just to give your group a statistical edge, you aren't winning on merit, you're winning on a handout. Thanks for admitting that a purely objective, score-driven system doesn't favor diversity. That's exactly why I support it.

English
17
11
52
2.3K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Aurum Amare
Aurum Amare@aurumamare·
Black bodies were used to build these institutions and the economy, and Black people were the fighters for civil rights for ALL minorities. Yet the first thing some Asian Americans do on their way up is take away opportunities that are rightfully owed back to Black people.
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson

I disagree with the Department of Justice going after Yale School of Medicine over DEI admissions policies and arguing that objective metrics like GPA and MCAT scores should dominate admissions decisions. The evidence does not support the idea that standardized test scores alone identify the best physicians. The MCAT predicts performance on other multiple-choice exams reasonably well. What MCAT scores do NOT predict are clinical judgment, communication, bedside skill, or physician performance. Put another way: doctors who test well tend to do well on examinations. But test scores do not predict how well they care for patients in clinics, hospitals, surgery, or real-world medicine. Meanwhile, more diverse physician workforces are associated with better preventive care, greater trust, improved access, and lower mortality in underserved communities. There is no objective evidence that excluding minority applicants within a reasonable score range improves patient outcomes. We need minority physicians in this country, and we have the data to prove why. So when people insist that “objective measures” alone should determine admission into medicine — while ignoring the evidence about what actually improves patient care — I increasingly see that argument as less about merit and more about preserving exclusion under the comforting language of statistics. "Equality feels like oppression to those who are privileged"

English
91
189
1.1K
33.7K
The Movie Monster
The Movie Monster@Pauline98476699·
"Is God is" only played in about 1500 theaters; it did not play in Pittsburgh, only in a few suburban theaters outside of Pittsburgh. 🤔 ‘Michael’ King Of Box Office With $26M U.S., $83M WW; ‘Obsession’ Romances $16M+ & ‘A-‘ CinemaScore – Sunday AM Box Office Update deadline.com/2026/05/box-of… via @Deadline
English
1
0
2
242
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Do you know what makes a good doctor? Do you ask your physician their MCAT score? Their class rank in medical school? Their Step scores? Or do you ask whether they listen, whether they stay calm under pressure, whether they explain things clearly, whether they can make hard decisions at 2 AM when someone is dying? Those of us who train physicians — from medical students to fellows — spend years discussing exactly this question. And one thing becomes obvious very quickly: merit is not reducible to a number. GPA and MCAT scores are opening screens. They help determine who can enter the conversation. They are not prophecies about who will become the best clinician, surgeon, teacher, scientist, or healer. We have all met brilliant people who collapse the moment uncertainty, chaos, or emotion enters the room. Would you want them taking the call when your child arrests at 2 AM? When your spouse has metastatic cancer? When your parent must come off a ventilator? Medicine is practiced on frightened human beings, not on Scantrons. And importantly, we actually know the literature on this. The relationship between standardized test scores and who becomes the most trusted physician, best professor, strongest researcher, or finest clinician is far weaker than many people desperately want to believe.
English
45
50
197
4.9K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Calling me a “morally degenerate racist” while repeatedly describing Black medical students as inherently “less qualified” based largely on standardized testing distributions is a level of projection almost admirable in its lack of self-awareness. You have spent this entire discussion reducing human potential, physician quality, and professional worth to numerical sorting while dismissing mountains of evidence about what actually predicts trust, communication, underserved care, and clinical excellence. And the truly revealing part is how emotionally invested you are in the idea that existing hierarchies must reflect natural superiority, rather than history, privilege, access, opportunity, and institutional design. Mirrors can be unpleasant things. Especially when someone has spent years mistaking prejudice for objectivity.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

The Asian families are naturally unhappy that their more qualified Asian children are being passed over in favor of less qualified black people, solely because the black people are black and the Asians are not, thanks to morally degenerate racists like you.

English
49
47
241
13.9K
Guinea Pig
Guinea Pig@SteamiCat·
@peachnamedgizmo She wants racists attacking black americans so she can get her people in the school
English
0
0
0
1
Down South GA Girl 🍑
Down South GA Girl 🍑@peachnamedgizmo·
Why are yall always specifically singling out black candidates against Asians? Yall got rid of affirmative action & still complaining
AAGHarmeetDhillon@AAGDhillon

At Yale Medical School, a black applicant is 29 times more likely to be invited to interview than an Asian with equally strong academics.   Today, @CivilRights told Yale that its use of race in admissions is ILLEGAL—and that @TheJusticeDept will step in to enforce Title VI. justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…

English
95
1.2K
9.3K
210.2K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Selected literature for those pretending this evidence does not exist: MCAT predictive validity: • Donnon et al. Acad Med. 2007 PMID: 17198300 () • Callahan et al. Acad Med. 2010 PMID: 20068426 () • Saguil et al. Mil Med. 2015 • Hanson et al. Acad Med. 2022 • Harvey et al. JNMA. 2025 Structural bias & admissions: • Lucey & Saguil. Acad Med. 2020 • Faiz et al. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 • Davis et al. Acad Med. 2013 • Nakae & Subica. JNMA. 2021 Physician diversity & outcomes: • Snyder et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 • Hill et al. J Health Econ. 2023 • Xu et al. AJPH. 1997 • Vichare et al. Ann Fam Med. 2024 Medical school diversity outcomes: • Saha et al. JAMA. 2008 • Morris et al. NEJM. 2021 • Ly et al. Ann Intern Med. 2022 • Florescu et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 The data is not hidden. Some people simply prefer outrage to reading.
English
15
37
154
20.7K
Guinea Pig retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
I understand why many Asian families feel frustrated in elite admissions systems. In intensely competitive environments, there is a real perception — and sometimes evidence — that exceptional academic performance still does not guarantee admission. That feeling should not be dismissed. But admissions committees also confront another reality: if you have 100 applicants from privileged, high-performing educational pipelines with nearly identical scores, resumes, research access, tutoring, and opportunities, it is not irrational to also value the applicant who achieved similar academic success despite poverty, instability, underfunded schools, family hardship, or lack of institutional advantages. That is not abandoning merit. It is recognizing that achievement exists in context. And medicine especially is not merely selecting expert test takers. It is selecting future physicians who will care for human beings across every class, culture, language, and circumstance in society. The irony is that many people who defend “objective merit” often become deeply uncomfortable the moment merit is evaluated in anything broader than a percentile ranking.
Yiatin Chu@ycinnewyork

The same has been felt by Asians when applying to selective colleges for decades. We knew our children had to accomplish way above others to earn the limited spots Ivy+ were willing to give us. The SFFA v Harvard case revealed the extent of the discrimination. Even with SCOTUS ruling that affirmative action is unconstitutional, medical schools like UCLA and Yale continue to evade. Thank goodness @CivilRights @AAGDhillon are pursuing them to comply.

English
208
373
2.5K
189.8K
Guinea Pig
Guinea Pig@SteamiCat·
@ResistanceSean We need lawyers that advocate for black Americans. Not black lawyer's that prioritize everything else.
English
0
0
0
1