StevenCrowley.eth

8.8K posts

StevenCrowley.eth banner
StevenCrowley.eth

StevenCrowley.eth

@StevenCrowley

Where do you go, my lovely?

Boynton Beach, FL Katılım Haziran 2008
721 Takip Edilen6.1K Takipçiler
StevenCrowley.eth
StevenCrowley.eth@StevenCrowley·
Is Post-Finasteride Syndrome actually real? I was on finasteride for 20 years and just stopped last month since we’re trying to have a baby and mentally, something feels… off. Foggy, dark, not like myself. Curious if anyone else has experienced this.
English
1
0
0
177
The Baltimore Sun
The Baltimore Sun@baltimoresun·
Reader commentary: Our Olympians deserve support, but Jimmy's Famous Seafood's profane way of coming to their defense shouldn't be celebrated. bit.ly/4u1O2bu
English
5.3K
67
726
886.3K
StevenCrowley.eth
StevenCrowley.eth@StevenCrowley·
When you realize actors were theater kids, you understand why they’re retards as adults.
English
0
0
0
56
StevenCrowley.eth retweetledi
SleeperCowboys
SleeperCowboys@SleeperCowboys·
With the Packers loss, the Cowboys will have the 12th and 20th pick in the 2026 NFL Draft.
SleeperCowboys tweet media
English
169
521
7.5K
240.9K
StevenCrowley.eth retweetledi
Tahmineh Dehbozorgi
Tahmineh Dehbozorgi@DeTahmineh·
The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world. Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime. Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it. Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine. This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: “all Middle Easterners are Arabs,” “all Arabs are Muslim,” and “all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers.” Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased. By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely. There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues. As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises. Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically. This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language. Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape. That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored. So the silence continues.
Tahmineh Dehbozorgi@DeTahmineh

The Iranian people are waging one of the most courageous anti-tyranny movements of our time against the Islamic Republic. The media’s silence is disgraceful. This regime will fall—and history will remember who stood for liberty and who looked away. x.com/Negaarsh/statu…

English
2.4K
22.3K
67.4K
6.2M
Caleb Hammer
Caleb Hammer@sircalebhammer·
The fat acceptance movement was a mistake.
English
538
932
30.9K
692.1K
StevenCrowley.eth
StevenCrowley.eth@StevenCrowley·
Wicked For Good is bad; shockingly bad second act to an almost perfect first one.
English
0
0
0
49
StevenCrowley.eth retweetledi
ESPN
ESPN@espn·
The Cowboys just beat both the teams that were in Super Bowl LIX in the span of FOUR DAYS 😳
ESPN tweet media
English
825
7K
52.1K
3.2M