Steven Hasty

30.1K posts

Steven Hasty banner
Steven Hasty

Steven Hasty

@StevenHasty1

My name is Steven Hasty, married to @KristaHasty. We make music and other content from a Biblical perspective.

Houston Katılım Ekim 2013
1K Takip Edilen8.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
My wife singing My Country Tis of Thee. Very thankful to live in this country. Happy New Year X! #music #HappyNewYear2026
English
0
0
0
276
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@TomFitton Have we lost our minds as conservatives? While I don't think we need to impeach Trump or remove him, we should be OPPOSING him on this!
English
5
0
1
145
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@marklevinshow If Iran will commit to opening the strait, I bet Trump extends the deadline.
English
0
0
2
232
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@rawsalerts Will they open the Strait for two weeks? If so, I bet Trump TACOs.
English
1
0
1
2.6K
R A W S A L E R T S
R A W S A L E R T S@rawsalerts·
🚨#BREAKING: Senior Iranian officials say the country is prepared for both peace and war with a stark warning that the situation has reached a pivotal moment with potentially far reaching consequences.
English
59
124
1.8K
171.6K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@MattWalshBlog Matt, thanks for being a voice of reason here. There's no way conservatives, especially Christians, should be hoping for anything other than de-escalation here.
English
2
0
6
266
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
This analysis seems correct to me. Anyone who shouts this down as “panican” or “TDS” or whatever is not a serious person.
Oren Cass@oren_cass

I mostly avoid commenting on what President Trump says from day to day, while pulling no punches in my assessments, whether positive or negative, of his policy. His Iran ultimatums feel different. Making such threats is a policy. If he were to follow through on them, the consequences would be immediate, irreversible, and catastrophic on a world-historical scale. So while some will inevitably insist he should be “taken seriously rather than literally,” or that he is executing a sophisticated “madman” strategy in a complex game of 5-D chess, or that he needs everyone’s steadfast support to maximize his leverage, now rather than later seems the time to say that the actions that he is proposing would be a disaster for our country, both strategically and morally, which makes the remarks themselves a terrible mistake. Simply put, what’s the point of all this? If these are empty threats that we all know he will not carry out, then they are ineffective threats (the Iranians are on X too!), merely making the president and our nation look foolish. If they are not empty threats, then the president is asserting the American position that such actions are acceptable in this situation and ones we are willing to take. We are not living in some quantum thought experiment where he simultaneously is and is not serious. We cannot expect the Iranians, but only the Iranians, will believe him. Whether the threats are empty or not, we should be willing to say: This is wrong. We should not establish a pattern of threatening escalation from a blockaded strait to elimination of a civilization. We should not launch strikes intended to devastate the lives of millions of people and take our nation to total war without indisputable justification, or before the American people have deliberated upon and assented to the path with full understanding of what total war might mean for them. Those principles are vital to our Republic, independent of whether the strategy could “work.” But it’s also worth emphasizing that the strategy is a dead end. This war is actively weakening American power, increasing the danger to American citizens, and frustrating the president’s important efforts at addressing our many domestic challenges. It has closed a strait that was previously open, strengthened the incentive for other nations to pursue nuclear weapons, and in this most recent rhetoric made more plausible their use. Our choices for continuing the war appear to be catastrophic escalation of the air war or extensive deployment of ground troops, neither of which were planned or had support at the outset. Stepping back from these threats and admitting such actions do not offer a path to resolving the conflict may be unpalatable, but it is by far the least unpalatable option available. Let us all hope cooler heads prevail.

English
418
223
3.5K
824.7K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@catturd2 Are you really wanting this? This will be catastrophic if we don't get a deal.
English
1
0
1
196
The Spectator Index
The Spectator Index@spectatorindex·
Trump says regarding talks with Iran, 'we negotiate with them, and then we always have to blow them up'.
English
102
332
2.8K
389.6K
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
You can now enable Claude to use your computer to complete tasks. It opens your apps, navigates your browser, fills in spreadsheets—anything you'd do sitting at your desk. Research preview in Claude Cowork and Claude Code, macOS only.
English
5K
14.4K
139.3K
77.6M
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@DavidLimbaugh We have to learn the art of disagreeing on the Republican side, and find a unifying message before November. The War in Iran is not going to be it.
English
0
0
0
37
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh@DavidLimbaugh·
I am an optimist and while I understand the cautious, perhaps realistic, more pessimistic view, I think it's usually presumptuous for anyone to make definitive calls this far out -- and so often their negative predictions prove wrong -- and they're rarely held accountable. So yes
Charles Drennon@CDrennon901

@DavidLimbaugh Mr. Limbaugh- I’m shamefully asking for your professional opinion on the midterms. Can we at least hold the Senate?

English
10
0
38
4.4K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@DrewHLive The world power structure is slowly moving away from American control.
English
0
0
2
65
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@HansMahncke Do you think opposing the Iran War in itself is anti-Israel?
English
6
0
15
3.9K
Hans Mahncke
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke·
Most of us don’t personally know Joe Kent, and I certainly don’t. But we probably know a number of people, whether in real life or online, who have suddenly shown anti-Semitic or at least anti-Israel tendencies. So what do you do about it? Do you block them and cut all ties? Do you try to engage them? Those are deeply personal choices, and everyone handles it differently. My starting assumption is that most of these people aren’t inherently bad, in fact, most of them are good people. But something has gone wrong, probably a mix of social media contagion, cognitive dissonance, and other factors. I’m not saying that being anti-Israel is automatically wrong, but what’s concerning is how quickly so many people’s views have turned. We do have recent precedent in that Covid showed us how quickly 80 or 90 percent of people could lose their minds, including those I would never have expected to enthusiastically support stripping away civil liberties. So yes, I don’t know exactly why it’s happening, only that it is part of human nature. And that’s why I won’t simply cast aside everyone who experiences this kind of shift.
English
133
29
190
98.1K
Cenk Uygur
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur·
Joe Kent, Director of National Counterterrorism for Trump resigned over the war. He said, “It is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” Good to see there are still patriots left. Everyone criticizing him now works for Israel.
English
188
1K
9.3K
93.3K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
Part of the issue with MAGA and the right currently is we expect 100% loyalty or else. We've lost the art of disagreeing and debating the issues. Unless we have some sort of unifying moment between now and November, it doesn't look good for Republicans retaining power. #MAGA
English
0
0
0
374
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
🚨White House response to Joe Kent's resignation. Perhaps we should have had more debate regarding our attack on Iran. #Iran #Trump
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.

English
0
0
0
79
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@MarioNawfal They are trying to portray strength but they seem to be back against the wall already.
English
0
0
0
404
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🚨🇮🇷 Iranians are calling him "the AI Supreme Leader." 6 days into his reign, Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen or heard. His own government is circulating AI-generated videos of him giving speeches that never happened. Standing beside his father, embracing Soleimani, because they have no real footage to work with. A cleric actually argued his invisibility is a virtue. "It says enough about his character that no one has ever seen him." The cardboard cutout memes are writing themselves. CNN
Mario Nawfal tweet mediaMario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel just hit Iran's Space Research Institute. Iran has been using commercial satellites (including Chinese ones) to feed targeting intelligence to IRGC forces throughout this war.

English
171
98
636
199.2K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@cb_doge It’s a crazy time and every second counts.
English
0
0
0
16
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
"I am working 7 days a week, mostly from when I wake up to when I go to sleep" — Elon Musk
English
491
370
2.3K
75.4K
Steven Hasty
Steven Hasty@StevenHasty1·
@TheInsiderPaper They have to get everyone on the same page in Iran. Guess that internet connection is spotty.
English
0
0
0
271
Insider Paper
Insider Paper@TheInsiderPaper·
BREAKING - Iran currently has 'no intention' to close Strait of Hormuz: FM bit.ly/4lemMT2
Insider Paper tweet media
English
17
25
97
11.2K