Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Strat
446 posts

Strat
@Strat_White
A sinner whom Jesus loves. Political conservative whose opinions and sins are my own. My intent on here is to illuminate and not needlessly insult and hate.
Katılım Kasım 2021
53 Takip Edilen18 Takipçiler
Strat retweetledi
Strat retweetledi

The “Christians are anti-science rubes” line is getting old.
And it just got blown out of the sky, literally.
Meet Victor Glover, pilot of Artemis II.
This dedicated man of faith just completed the first crewed mission around the Moon since 1972.
While looking back at the Earth from deep space, he didn’t have a crisis of faith. He said the view reinforced his belief in creation.
And he’s not new to this. Glover has already taken communion cups and a Bible into space on previous missions. He’s been open about his faith the entire time.
He’s not the first either.
Back in 1968, the Apollo 8 crew, the first humans to leave Earth orbit and circle the Moon, read from the book of Genesis on live television on Christmas Eve.
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth…”
Millions heard it. The world didn’t collapse. Science didn’t shatter. The mission succeeded.
Funny how the guys literally orbiting the Moon never got the “faith equals dumb” memo.
Real faith lasts under pressure while the “Christians are anti-science” stereotype crumbles.
The same people who mock believers as backward rubes have no answer for the long line of men and women of faith who have pushed the frontiers of science and exploration precisely because they believed the universe was orderly, intelligible, and created by a rational God.
From the Apollo 8 crew reading Genesis to Victor Glover carrying Scripture and communion into lunar orbit, the pattern is clear.
The more some people see of the cosmos, the more convinced they become that it didn’t just happen by accident.
This is what real faith looks like.
Not the version that hides from hard questions or fears the data.
The version that looks at the Earth from 240,000 miles away and sees the hand of the Creator even more clearly.
The version that carries a Bible into space because the same God who hung the stars is the same God who hung on the cross.
To every atheist who loves to trot out the “anti-science” insult. The evidence keeps stacking up against you. The men and women who have actually left the planet and looked back don’t seem to agree with your narrative.
And to every believer who’s ever been mocked for holding both faith and reason, keep going. Keep exploring. Keep speaking truth when they ask.
The King who set the stars in place is the same King who rose from the grave.
He is risen.
He is risen indeed.
All glory to the King who made the heavens and the earth, and who still calls men and women of faith to the very edge of it.

English
Strat retweetledi

@pureMetatron It's technically not a sphere because it bulges around the equator.
English
Strat retweetledi

The story behind the New York Times’ 1903 claim that human flight was between one and ten million years away is even worse than it looks.
Once you understand the backstory, you realize that the New York Times story is not really about flight at all but about how elites and credentialed “experts” mistake their own failures for the boundaries of possibility.
The New York Times did not dismiss the possibility of powered flight at random. There was a very specific reason behind it. At the time, America’s most prominent scientific authority, Smithsonian Secretary Samuel Langley, had been showered with large amounts of taxpayer funding to build an aircraft, the Langley Aerodrome. Despite all the money, institutional backing, and elite prestige, Langley and his team could not get it to fly, culminating in a series of very public failures, the last on December 8, 1903.
So when the New York Times declared that flight was millions of years away, what it was really saying was that if the most credentialed and well-funded “experts” cannot do it, then it cannot be done.
A mere nine days later, the elites’ proclamation of impossibility lay in ruins. Two totally unknown bicycle mechanics from Ohio achieved the first powered flight using improvised parts, a few hundred dollars of their own money, and sheer persistence.
The story of flight is, at its core, a story of the triumph of American individualism over elite credentialism. The fact that it was the New York Times that inadvertently delivered the proof is the most fitting conclusion imaginable.
Aaron Ng@localghost
"Man won't fly for a million years" – NYT 1903
English

@YouTubeROCKDUM @IMAO_ It's tidally locked to Earth, meaning it rotates as fast as it goes around the orbit of Earth. This means that when we look up to the moon, we always see the same side of it no matter where in its orbit it currently is.
English
Strat retweetledi

@extradeadjcb I don’t actually think Artemis is a good platform but by god I will defend it against anyone saying we shouldn’t spend any money on space at all
English
Strat retweetledi

Artemis is an absurdly expensive boondoggle & it will cost the same as ~14 hours of Medicare/Social Security spending
a_0conformist 🔃@Bottom_Creek
@frontierism Im gonna fix it for ya
English

@djscottlong @SubRosaMagick Huh. Learn something new everyday I suppose. Thanks!
English

@Strat_White @SubRosaMagick It's in the 'Sound of Music', "How do you Solve a Problem Like Maria", they call her that. She's literally walking down the Aisle to get married while they call her flibbertigibbet.
English

@AviFelman I'd reframe it as Uncomfortable Truth vs Polite Lie
Politeness is not sacrosanct. Kindness is, but telling an uncomfortable truth over a lie is in-fact kind. It's just not polite.
English

@Michaeldudufudu Ill take one for the yte team
This is reparations for pearl harbor
English

@DaveShapi Sitch I think is a Canadian. He's a political commentator on YouTube and translated his words into Japanese here. Idk if he actually speaks Japanese but tbh I wouldn't be surprised.
English

Part of it requires realizing the enemy doesn't care if it's true or not. Decent and polite societies tend to try to think of the other as also decent and thus believe such accusations are being made in good faith. But they are not. They're being made to tear you down.
The other part is relentlessly defending yourself isn't necessary as well. Instead go on offense.
Both require a decent amount of exposure to the problem for the antidote to manifest.
English

これに対するアメリカニキたちの反応で「もう気にしないことにしたぜ!」と言っているのが結構あるのが味わい深い。多分ポリコレに対して一番効く、我々が今日からでも実践出来る対処法の一つは「みんなでガン無視」なんだろうな。でもそういう合意形成が、現代民主社会においては一番難しいのだが。
堪忍袋の王(宮永亮)@AkiraMIYANAGA
アメリカのBBQおっさんたち、本当に理不尽なポリコレに晒されてきたんだな…辛かったんだな…
日本語


「より多くする」とか「倍増させる」とか「もっと頑張る」とか曖昧な言い方じゃなくって「四倍」っていうクソデカ倍率を明確に出してきてカウボーイの気概を感じる……
Napoleon Bonaparte Appreciator@NapoleonBonabot
Listen to the cries of Japan, Anon. We must quadruple the beef and milk herds and rescue Japan from the tyranny of not being able to afford meat and dairy.
日本語















