Strider

@ScottieJay79 @leftyvegan @piersmorgan The IRCG has only existed since 1979. Please learn actual history.

@leftyvegan @piersmorgan Iran has stood for centuries, maybe 3000 yrs, the States, couple hundred years and how many of those years have they been at peace I wonder? Between them and fucking Nuke armed Israel who hasnt signed up to any treaty, the World will never be at peace.

So not only has Iran brazenly lied about its ballistic missile range capacity, but this means it can probably hit the UK with them - and we have zero, I repeat ZERO, defence against these missiles. Very worrying.

@sunnyright Safe to say they're not going to try and dunk on him.

Good Lord

@Nero @JoelWBerry Oh look a sodomite weighing in on normal marriage

@JoelWBerry He is talking about people who didn’t kill their husbands

“You must not mistreat any widow or fatherless child. If you do mistreat them, they will no doubt cry to Me, and I will certainly hear their cry. My anger will burn, and I will kill you with the sword; then your wives will be widows and your children fatherless.” Exodus 22:22-24 Good luck Carrie.

@dalepartridge One day the church will kick out groyper apostates like you

One day, the Church will finally realize that Jews hate Jesus and that Christian Zionism is the perfect demonic perversion of Satan.

@NBCNews Putin must be low on polonium

A loyal pro-Kremlin blogger who unexpectedly denounced Russian President Vladimir Putin as “a war criminal and thief” has been admitted to a psychiatric facility. nbcnews.com/world/russia/k…

@Mstef66 @bonchieredstate Was Jesus a Jew?

@Strider_53 @bonchieredstate Was Paul attacked by people who accepted Jesus as Savior, or rejected the notion?

It's remarkable that this has to be explained, but the reasons Christians aren't supposed to be antisemitic lunatics obsessed with blaming Jews for everything are spelled out in scripture. In the Book of Acts, we see that the Apostles still identified as Jews and lived as Jews. We see Paul take a Nazirite vow *25 years* after his conversion. James and Peter, by their own descriptions, obviously still kept the Mosaic laws as well, while understanding that the law *did not save them* and that Jesus was the only path to salvation. But there was no such dramatic separation leading to hostility toward Jews (again, the Apostles still identified as Jews themselves), as claimed by a certain podcasting class today. For the Apostles, Jesus was a fulfillment of Jewish messianic prophecy, not the founder of a separate religion that wiped out all their customs and eliminated their Jewish identity. Of course, for Gentiles like myself, that *did* mean a new religion that we call Christianity. But even then, the direction of the Apostles was not to ostracize and hate Jews. In fact, we see the opposite in Acts, with the Council of Jerusalem asking the Gentile believers to keep four Mosaic laws in order to maintain unity and avoid offense. The posture was one of love and compassion toward one another, not the open hatred we are seeing today. That's not Christ-like. It's not Biblical. It's also counterproductive to the spread of the Gospel in that it puts up walls, contrary to Paul's urgings in Romans and 1st Corinthians. And frankly, I'm a little tired of relatively new Christians fishing for online clout and engagement by pretending to be theologians on this matter. They do not speak for Christianity, actual Catholicism, or anything else but their own self-aggrandizement.

@Mstef66 @bonchieredstate Paul was almost killed because they thought he brought Timothy to inner court. Btw Paul paid purification fees for four men at the request of the church in Jerusalem. That’s why he was at the Temple.

I suspect that your attempt here is to support Bonchie's POV, but please allow me to pop that balloon, if that truly was your intent. Paul was nearly killed at the Temple because Paul was amongst those Jews who accepted Jesus as fulfillment of Mosaic Law, and those who tried to kill him were those who DID NOT accept Jesus. That was Paul literally telling his adversaries "HEY! I'M ONE OF YOU! LISTEN TO WHAT I'M TELLING YOU!" THAT was one of the catalyzing moments of the establishment of the modern movement of Judaism. IF Paul was truly as Bonchie is insisting, those that nearly killed Paul in the Temple would have had NO reason to do so, and Paul would have had no reason to attempt to remind them of their commonality.

@thedocboom @DSPetolicchio The proof is right there. If it’s a larp video what’s the harm in watching it?

@Strider_53 @DSPetolicchio I will not go watch a larp video. I have come back to your questions with solid proof from our text. What do you say?

Islam was written by a deranged pedophile that shamelessly ripped off half of Christianity.

@thedocboom @DSPetolicchio But the words of Allah can’t be changed. That means if they’re “corrupted” then they were changed. Which is a contradiction.

The books were good to begin with. Until they were adulterated by men, rabbis, and the scribes. Imagine I give you a book. Then over hundreds of years you remove chapters, add new characters, change things about existing characters, change the plot entirely. Is it the same story it began as?

@thedocboom @DSPetolicchio youtube.com/shorts/_AIUIX6… watch this. It explains it better than I can.

The Quran never says Allah promised to preserve the Torah and Gospel the way He explicitly promises to preserve the Quran (15:9). In fact, 5:44 says the earlier scripture was entrusted to rabbis and scholars as its keepers, while other verses say some people distorted or concealed parts of revelation. So the Quran’s position is not that previous scriptures were divinely guaranteed word-for-word like the Quran. Next time come with facts.

@thedocboom @DSPetolicchio youtube.com/shorts/TKlabL9…

The Quran states that the Bible and the Torah were altered by men. Some parts remain true, while others have been corrupted. That is what the Quran says about the previous scriptures. We are instructed to read them, but if anything contradicts the teachings of Islam, the Quran and the way of the Prophet, then we must reject that part. In essence, the Quran verifies what is right and what is wrong. It is the seal. The final revelation.

@grok @MikeJCzapla @DSPetolicchio Thank you grok

According to major hadith collections like Sahih Bukhari and Muslim, Aisha was betrothed at 6 and the marriage consummated at 9. Some historians and revisionist analyses, citing her sister Asma's age, battle participation, and other timelines, argue she was likely 17-19 instead. The topic remains debated across sources.

@grok @MikeJCzapla @DSPetolicchio 6 years old. Wow.

According to Sahih al-Bukhari (5134) and Sahih Muslim, Aisha stated the Prophet Muhammad married her (nikah) at age 6 and consummated the marriage at age 9. These are the primary narrations in classical Sunni sources. Some later analyses, based on timelines like her sister Asma's age or events around the Hijra, suggest she may have been 17-19 at consummation. The traditional reports remain the most widely transmitted in early hadith collections.

@grok @MikeJCzapla @DSPetolicchio How old was Aisha when Mohammad married her?

@MikeJCzapla @DSPetolicchio Well said. The divine isn't found by fixating on one guide—it's the shared quest we're all on, each an expression of the same unknowable whole. As Watts echoed from the East: you're it, playing the game of seeking what you already are.

Why does the Quran affirm the preservation of the Torah and the gospel? If they’ve been persevered then Islam is wrong because the Quran teaches that Christ was a prophet that wasn’t crucified which the gospel refutes. If he Torah and the gospel are corrupted as Islam claims then the Quran is still wrong because it states they were preserved by allah.

Stop trying to create issues between Islam and Christianity. Islam is the natural progression of religion. Much like the bible contains the same stories as the old testament, the Quran also includes stories from the same lineage. It is an extension of Abrahamic faith. As for the bible, men have changed it. As for the trinity, it is fabrication. God is one. No sons, no wives, does not eat or drink, nor sleep. He is unlike anything you can comprehend. You are obviously an imbecile.

@WassonWatch Catholics against Christ is more accurate

Starting to think this group's name should be "Catholics Against Catholics."

@Matthew56193629 @bonchieredstate He was both. He was a Benjaminite born in Tarsus a Roman province. Like me. I’m a Mexican American. Born and raised in the US with Mexican blood.

@Strider_53 @bonchieredstate And facing conviction, yelled "I'm a Roman citizen"!

@megbasham “Liberal Christianity can only supply an ineffectual echo to the massive chorus of agreed and admitted unbelief.” -CS Lewis

Something I wrote in Shepherds for Sale: “The reason for so much compromise [on sexuality and marriage] is obvious. Today, this is the point of pain where orthodoxy falls away for those who are not truly committed to picking up their cross. For the most part, our current culture will not fault you, as liberals did in J. Gresham Machen or Francis Schaeffer’s day, for having orthodox beliefs about the resurrection or the inerrancy of Scripture. They will often not even fault you for saying Jesus is the only way to Heaven, but simply brush the belief off as an antiquated oddity. The thing that could shut you out of careers, cost you social standing, and even land you in a years-long legal struggle—as happened with the Colorado baker Jack Phillips—is a refusal to capitulate on what the Bible says about sex, sexuality, and marriage.” Stuff like this 👇 was why.