Matt Stringham

986 posts

Matt Stringham banner
Matt Stringham

Matt Stringham

@Stringhammer86

15 Years Digital Marketing, Web Development. I test AI tools for Marketing so you don't have too. 🦞🪽

Salt Lake City, UT Katılım Mayıs 2012
434 Takip Edilen155 Takipçiler
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
#AI doesn’t replace the marketer. It gives the marketer more leverage. This week, we used a human-led, AI-enabled process to turn a fragmented ecommerce product catalog into a clean paid-social launch system: • 19 product ads structured • 96 product images mapped and QA’d • 19 primary-text variations updated • Every ad packaged for clear client approval • Nothing launched without human sign-off The humans set the strategy, exclusions, voice, approvals, and launch rules. AI handled the repeatable execution: organizing assets, mapping products to creative, applying approved revisions, checking consistency, and assembling the review layer. UTMs etc. That’s the real opportunity: not “AI marketing” with no accountability. Human judgment + AI leverage + a clear approval process. How is AI helping your agency? Tech stack: 🪽@NousResearch 🦞 @openclaw @OpenAI / @Meta
English
0
0
0
15
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@colinsolvely @MichaelGannotti Openclaw is smart out of the gate. The challenges in its updates are worth it IMO. Hermes has great potential but it needs a lot of guidance. My 🦞 struggles with updates but once running its performance is solid.
English
1
0
1
18
Mike Gannotti
Mike Gannotti@MichaelGannotti·
Ran new OpenClaw update on my last remaining OpenClaw this morning and .... I'm done... last OpenClaw going to Hermes.
Mike Gannotti tweet media
English
26
0
34
2.8K
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
Whoa.
Ruben@rdominguezibar

Demis Hassabis just published the most consequential essay in AI this year. Nobel Prize winner. CEO of Google DeepMind. The person who built AlphaFold. His estimate: AGI in a few years. His comparison: not the internet. Electricity. Fire. The number that should stop you cold is this one. 10x the Industrial Revolution at 10x the speed. The Industrial Revolution took 100 years to reshape civilization. He is describing something an order of magnitude larger happening in a decade. His policy proposal is the part nobody is covering: ▫️ A FINRA-style Standards Body for frontier AI ▫️ Labs submit models 30 days before release for independent testing ▫️ Benchmarks updated quarterly, built independently from labs ▫️ The body could coordinate a slowdown among all Frontier Labs if needed That last bullet is the one. The CEO of Google DeepMind just publicly proposed a legal mechanism to pause AI development if the situation demands it. He ended with this: "We've essentially found a way to make sand think." Either the most important sentence written this decade or the most embarrassing. No in between.

English
0
0
0
8
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
AI agents are moving beyond chatbots. We just completed an enterprise pilot where AI analyzed a large archive of poorly labeled historical records, compared conflicting metadata sources, identified cataloging errors, and generated evidence-backed corrections. But the valuable part wasn’t simply “using AI.” We built a controlled workflow around it: • Validate source files before trusting them • Compare old and new metadata systematically • Sample the underlying records for evidence • Flag uncertain cases for human review • Map AI output to an approved vocabulary • Measure accuracy before scaling The pilot worked. Now we’re moving into the next phase: connecting the system to approved APIs and testing it as a repeatable program. This is where enterprise AI gets interesting. Not replacing experts. Giving them a system that can investigate thousands of records, surface the exceptions, and let humans focus on the decisions that actually require judgment. The companies that win with AI won’t just have the best model. They’ll build the best validation loop around it. #ai @OpenAI @openclaw @GeminiApp
Matt Stringham tweet media
English
0
0
0
25
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@AlexFinn It'll probably be faster than Fable 5. My last administrative task I had to ask it where it went 😅
English
0
0
0
202
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
You are going to be able to run Fable 5 locally on your desk In 2 years Apple will be coming out with Mac Studios with 1.5TB of memory With just 300gb of memory you can run Opus 4.8 level intelligence Think of what you can do with 5x that You need to be preparing for this now Start getting familiar with local AI technology Go to your Hermes/OpenClaw and use this prompt: “I am brand new to local AI and want to get familiar. Look at the computer you are currently on. Understand the specs. Then go on Huggingface and find the best models I can run on it. Then, walk me through how these models work, how they will run locally, and use cases I can do with them. After walking me through all of that so I’m educated, you can then load it onto this computer and build an interface so I can use them” In 2 years EVERYONE on Earth will have a local model running on their desk The people who start preparing now will be WAY ahead of everyone else
AppleTrack@appltrack

Apple's M7 Ultra chip coming in 2029 is rumored to support 1.5TB of RAM. This would make the processor much more capable for on-device AI.

English
283
236
3.2K
587.2K
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
This is the only thing holding back the🦞. It 100% outperforms everything else that I use, but as soon as I update it or make a change somewhere, it's almost devastating. But I think it's also making me an open-claw professional at this point. #openclaw
Matt Stringham tweet media
English
0
0
1
51
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@DaveShapi This kills me 😂. If you’re that dependent on one single model you’re not playing the game properly.
English
0
0
0
11
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@Vivek4real_ To charge % of value, labs would need to inspect your financials. That's MORE IP exposure — the thing Karp says he's against.
English
0
0
0
181
Vivek Sen
Vivek Sen@Vivek4real_·
PALANTIR'S CEO EXPOSED SAM ALTMAN AND DARIO AMODEI FOR ROBBING EVERY FORTUNE 500 COMPANY. “EVERY SINGLE ENTERPRISE IN THIS COUNTRY, THESE PEOPLE ARE LIVID. THEY ARE PAYING FOR TOKENS THAT CREATE NO VALUE. THESE PEOPLE ARE STEALING THE WEIGHTS AND ALPHA OF MY BUSINESS.” “IF IT WAS SO VALUABLE, LET'S SAY I CAN MAKE YOU $1 BILLION TOMORROW. WOULDN'T I SAY I'LL MAKE YOU $1 BILLION AND I WANT 30 PERCENT? WHY ARE THEY CHARGING FOR TOKENS IF IT'S SO VALUABLE?”
English
20
43
300
36.3K
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
Remember when they shut us down. On a weekend. With 12hours notice.
Alex Finn@AlexFinn

BOOM! Fable 5 staying on subs. I called this yesterday Anthropic was going to concede the AI race to OpenAI if they didn’t do this Nobody was going to use Fable 5 on API pricing. Outrageously expensive. So people would be stuck with Opus 4.8. Opus 4.8 vs ChatGPT 5.6 has the largest gap between frontier models these 2 companies have ever had. The race would be over. Everyone would switch to ChatGPT 5.6 over night I 100% guarantee Opus 5 is dropping the moment Fable comes off subs again to close that gap. Opus 5 will be the affordable version of Fable Enjoy the extended super intelligence

English
0
0
0
31
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
BOOM! Fable 5 staying on subs. I called this yesterday Anthropic was going to concede the AI race to OpenAI if they didn’t do this Nobody was going to use Fable 5 on API pricing. Outrageously expensive. So people would be stuck with Opus 4.8. Opus 4.8 vs ChatGPT 5.6 has the largest gap between frontier models these 2 companies have ever had. The race would be over. Everyone would switch to ChatGPT 5.6 over night I 100% guarantee Opus 5 is dropping the moment Fable comes off subs again to close that gap. Opus 5 will be the affordable version of Fable Enjoy the extended super intelligence
Claude@claudeai

We're extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19.

English
201
101
2.3K
252.1K
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
Okay I get what you guys are saying. Grok is clearly not as intelligent as these other products (yet) but its vibe is way better. Grok still can't adhere to some simple constraints and conveniently "forgets" and takes too many shortcuts. Example: my Roman Legion simulation I'm working on is meant to be ABM (agent-based modeling) so soldiers get into formation on their own. Grok, however, CONTINUALLY smuggled in global grid patterns and seating auctions like how ordinary video games do it. ChatGPT caught that immediately, so I fired Grok from the team. With that said, Grok Build is still way more fun to use. Even if it's not nearly as bright, and struggles with hard constraints. With that said, I asked Fable for a business plan the other week and one of the hard constraints was "it must respect my limited energy" and it just treated that as a trivial inconvenience and mostly ignored it. So, Claude remains an insufferable asshole most of the time, even if it is smarter than Grok, it's just monumentally unpleasant to use.
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi

Okay is it just me or is Claude Code (even with Fable) really fucking dumb compared to Grok 4.5? I can give Grok Build a more vague set of instructions like "drill down into this folder and then find the latest files" and it will explore the whole file tree and find the file but CC is just like "you mean search the current working directory?" NO. It's fucking dumb.

English
11
2
79
8.4K
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
A multifamily campaign can generate traffic, leads, and still leave you unable to answer the only question that matters: Is this actually working? We recently audited an active apartment campaign that had produced: - 2,551 link clicks - 1,914 landing-page views - 99 platform-reported leads On paper, that looks like activity. But the measurement path was broken. The website had no live Meta Pixel. No live GA4 tracking. And when someone clicked Apply Now, the source data disappeared before reaching the property-management system. So the team could see clicks. They could see reported leads. But they could not confidently connect paid traffic to tours, applications, or leases. We repaired the foundation: - Restored Meta Pixel tracking - Added GA4 measurement - Preserved first-touch campaign, ad set, ad, placement, and UTM data - Passed attribution data through the application handoff - Cleaned up homepage metadata, canonical settings, and social metadata - Verified the full path from a paid-social landing page through the application CTA This is not the glamorous part of marketing. It is the part that makes every future decision smarter. Before calling traffic “bad,” before changing creative, before increasing budget, and before declaring a campaign a win or loss—make sure the measurement system can actually tell the truth. Traffic without attribution is just expensive ambiguity. #MultifamilyMarketing #ApartmentMarketing #MetaAds #GA4 #MarketingAttribution #PropertyManagement #DigitalMarketing
Matt Stringham tweet media
English
0
0
0
24
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Hello beautiful people! We have reset usage limits across Codex and ChatGPT Work. And another one will come later in the day. Rejoice. Now that I have your attention, a quick update on ChatGPT Work, Codex and all the updates we shared yesterday. We’ve spent the last 24 hours reading feedback, looking at usage patterns, and talking with many of you. The short version is that there is a *lot* of excitement for GPT 5.6 Sol, ChatGPT Work on mobile & web, but also that we didn't get everything quite right. - We made it too easy to use the highest-compute settings without making the impact on usage limits sufficiently clear. - We reorganized the desktop app in one bold move, making familiar things like chats and projects harder to find. - Our launch framing was focused on ChatGPT Work and to some of our Codex fans it made it feel like Codex was going away over time. Absolutely not our intention, we love Codex and it is here to stay. - And we introduced regressions for some existing multi-agent workflows, alongside a collection of rough edges in plugins and other parts of the experience. We’re landing a first set of improvements today. We’re resetting usage twice so people can keep experimenting, changing defaults and the model picker so they don’t push people toward unnecessarily expensive settings, fixing several plugin submission issues, improving how we represent Codex in the product, and cleaning up some of the most immediate desktop problems. A larger set of improvements will land next week. We’re bringing chats and projects back into the sidebar in a more familiar and customizable way, making usage and reset timing much more visible, clarifying when to use ChatGPT Work and when to use Codex, and addressing the many other smaller pieces of great feedback we've had. The ambition behind this launch hasn’t changed. We think bringing ChatGPT and Codex together into a workspace where people and agents can collaborate is a very important step forward. But an ambitious direction doesn’t excuse avoidable confusion or regressions in the first version. Please keep the feedback coming. We’re moving quickly, and you should see the experience already get better with a few updates today; and substantially better again next week.
English
2K
835
13.9K
2.2M
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@AlexFinn This is REAL! Give it computer access folks. It’s amazing.
Matt Stringham tweet media
English
0
0
1
157
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
My favorite ChatGPT 5.6 Codex tip: “Just do it yourself” Anytime I’m building in Codex and it asks me to do something (log in, download this, click on that, get an API key, sign up for this) I just respond “just do it yourself” Codex is SUCH a good agent harness it literally 100% of the time can do all those tasks itself Much like yourself, it is constantly underestimating its own abilities. It’s computer and browser use is so good that basically no task online can’t be automated by Codex now What you’ll find by doing this exercise is basically 100% of your knowledge work can be automated All the manual steps that go into building things can now be done by AI agents. Bonus tip: after it does something it asked you to do, tell it to turn what it did into a skill so that moving forward it never asks you to do it again If you do this over and over, you’ll end up saving SO much time in the long run because Codex will be able to automate basically everything you do on a computer Start implementing this immediately
English
94
23
599
55.6K
Matt Stringham
Matt Stringham@Stringhammer86·
@Meta - "apply these recommendations" Also Meta: "try again later"
Matt Stringham tweet mediaMatt Stringham tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Gal Shir
Gal Shir@galshirart·
It’s over. I’m quitting design. A client of mine just created a logo with Fable 5, and the result left me speechless. It understood the brand story, values, audience, strategy, and turned all of it into a smart, minimal symbol. A genuinely brilliant concept. The kind of idea that captures everything at once. Something I honestly don’t think I would have come up with myself. And it didn’t just nail the idea. It executed the design pixel-perfectly. So I raise the white flag. My skepticism about AI’s ability to do great design is officially gone. There, I said it: AI beat me at design. Now that AI finally took my job, I can peacefully quit and dedicate my life to studying the only thing it may never achieve: human consciousness and the pathways to God. Good luck everyone.
English
953
294
6.2K
7.1M

Keşfet

@NousResearch @openclaw @OpenAI @Meta @colinsolvely @MichaelGannotti @GeminiApp @AlexFinn