Stuart Oberholzer

@ammandev I said for a long time he was overrated af. How no one else saw it is beyond me

This is what we used to have to deal with. 🫠

@ManUtd We care why?

Jadon Sancho turns 26 today! 🎈

@ncakos316 Then don't watch? 😕

No matter who wins, cricket has lost.

@JHBWater is this how you treat paying customers? Blocking them for wanting to know what the hell is going on? Cc @emi_koekemoer

@JHBWater @kitchen_ad67876 How do you not understand your own system?!? Don't worry I will help you out, Ferndale is fed by the Kensington B tower. Now we know why this organization is such a shit show

#JoburgUpdates Randburg System Update ^SE

@JHBWater It's easy to save water when you have none in your taps 🙄

#NationalWaterWeek | Dumisani Macu, from Johannesburg Water’s Midrand Depot, is dedicated to reducing water loss and protecting our city’s supply. Every drop counts - saving water starts with you. #JoziSaveWater #WeServeJoburg

@JHBWater @CityofJoburgZA @ewn @News24 no water for days, refuse uncollected for over a week, parts of our enclosure have no power. @Lesufi I hope you are proud of what you haven't achieved. Enjoy your hotel showers while your city dies

#JoburgUpdates Update: Unplanned Water Interruption: Elise Street and Malibongwe Drive in Ruiterhof. ^LM

@JHBWater You were telling people that water was returning to some areas. So basically you lied! How does it take a whole day to detect a leak! Absolutely useless

@JHBWater How do we still not have water in Bryanston x3. The issue was fixed 9 hours ago!

Daily water supply system status updates: Thursday, 19 March 2026 (Afternoon) ^PK

@AwarenessLvL10 @007TXValidator Personally I want more clarity on burns that may be implemented

Don’t miss the main point of the proposal- it does t rearrange, modify or suggest anychanges to validators and founders. The main focus is how the 40% community allocation is distributed and protected from outside scavenging, siphoning and misuse. The paradigm used is an extension of the founders allocation. The founders have a protected 60% and it has distinct designations and earmarks. Our proposal does the same. It locks in 1/2 of the 40billion for legacy holders at a one time snapshot- so everyone is guaranteed their share of the community PSE at an equal 1/83 a month over 83 months to make them whole and at the same time validators have a constant, predictable PSE stream. The other 1/2 of the 40billion is used for growth of the community, staking with no outside pillaging of the supply for projects, grants or skimming wallets. Funding/ grants come exclusively from the founders. -no dilution from outside sources and all legacy holders and whoever stakes at the time of the snapshot will receive a smart-contract with their 1/83 setup to drop every month based on what they have staked. How can you not get behind this level of transparency? Coreum and Sologenic holders both have been diluted to a puddle. This proposal allows all holders to get a constant PSE to make them whole over the 83 months and validators get constant predictable / measurable growth. Community trust restored and guardrails established on how the community PSE can be spent. Sounds like a win win to me.

Thanks for sharing the proposal and for taking the time to think about the long-term structure of the TX ecosystem. I appreciate the effort and the intention to protect the network’s future. Personally, I’m not supportive of governance or tokenomic changes at this stage. TX is still in its early phase, and the priority right now should be allowing the network to launch, stabilize, and grow under the framework that was designed for it. One of the main reasons many of us are here is because we trust the team building TX. They have access to far more operational data and modeling than the rest of us, and they designed the current tokenomics with a specific strategy in mind. My view is that the most constructive approach right now is to give them the room to execute and deliver on that plan before we start revisiting structural elements of the system. That doesn’t mean governance discussions are not valuable — they absolutely are — but in my opinion those conversations will be more meaningful once the network has had time to operate and we can evaluate things based on real experience rather than early assumptions. For that reason, my preference would be to allow TX to run under the current structure for a while before considering proposals that modify governance or token distribution. At the end of the day, participation in any ecosystem comes down to conviction. If someone believes in the team and the direction of the project, the reasonable approach is to give them time to execute. If someone does not share that level of trust, there are many other opportunities in the market where they may feel more comfortable allocating their capital.

@AronBWaters @JamesCrypto87 @coinholderX Not sure I would call his move jumping ship but hey each to their own

@JamesCrypto87 Definitely been scammed. @coinholderX jumping ship, just like many others in the past that were suddenly gone.

Options for #TX holders: 1) Sell BEFORE TGE! But it's too late now. ⛔ 2) Stake all your #TX and gain as much PSE as possible. ✅ 3) Sell now at a fraction of your initial capital - no point doing it. ⛔ Have we been scammed? Let's be real...my answer is yes! 😭 But one should be responsible for your own move. I started scaling down my #Coreum holding by 40% back in December 2025. However, I didn't make a public announcement as that will hurt the market even more 😅 So, we will have to live with what we got and make the best out of it! 💪🏻💪🏻

@JamesCrypto87 Your pinned comment says something completely different 🙄

@txEcosystem @BingXOfficial So it's need days and all you have to say is a few more places will support the migration? This whole thing was rushed clearly. Can @MikeMcC1uskey and @bobrasX come out of hiding?

BingX will support the token swap to $TX. Users holding $COREUM or $SOLO on @BingXOfficial will have their balances automatically converted according to the established ratios: $COREUM 1:1 $SOLO 1:2.345422 $TX

@DEGENLABS_CO @leap_wallet Quick one, I have mine stored and staked in Keplr. Its still showing as 'Core' is this something I need to wait out until tx is displayed?

GM Friday. Important day for the ecosystem with the $TX conversion now live. Before the timeline fills up with confused degens asking what to click, here’s a simple guide to help you through it ↓ PS: If your $COREUM is already in @leap_wallet and staked, relax. It’ll auto convert to $TX automatically. No panic swapping needed 😅 good luck!

@Sologenic_Teams How do I do that?

You need to add Tx as custom token before it can load up your balance and start displaying your tokens as Tx in your wallet

@txEcosystem Honestly what a shit show at launch. tx not showing on wallets correctly, price dump and the team nowhere to be seen.

When change comes fast, clarity matters. This is your space. Ask anything about tx: migration, swap ratios, PSE, roadmap, vision, etc. The team will reply on this post with official answers. Drop your questions below👇

@NickbuckXRP @txEcosystem I'm still not seeing tx in my Keplr wallet, I only had Coreum. Do I need to do this too?

@txEcosystem Can I receive TX in xaman?

The wait is over. The Sologenic Bridge Swap Tool is now available for $SOLO → $TX conversion. 👉 sologenic.org/bridge/convert Here’s how it works and what wallets are supported. 🧵

@AlbertoroblesX Thank you, do you know what time the snapshot will take place?

@txEcosystem I'm holding my Coreum in a Keplr wallet, is there anything I need to do after the migration?

@ProteasMenCSA Embarrassing

Halfway through the run chase. ⏳ New Zealand continue to press on, reaching 124/1 after 10 overs. 🏟 They require a further 46 runs from 60 balls. 🏏 #Unbreakable #T20WorldCup