Stuart 🤷♂️
14.9K posts

Stuart 🤷♂️
@Stuart07339861
Seriously anti woketards, anti libtards, and of course Anti-Zombies aka EFF/MK. I simply mute or block Bots and assholes - and there are shitload of them
Katılım Şubat 2019
196 Takip Edilen117 Takipçiler

@GrandPrixDiary F1 is busy destroying its following now. The 20million Max followers will just kill it off finally. No one except a few Georgina fans will bother
English

Sorry but this is just nonsense. F1 continued (and thrived) after the likes of Senna and Schumacher and it will no doubt do so after Verstappen. You’re saying F1 will suffer when he stops? Name your figure and I’ll bet you it will make very little difference in the long run.
Plankmilton🧠@Verstappenn_
F1 took a monumental hit when Schumacher retired and I think it will take the same when Max retires. Having the absolute benchmark driver leave because he finds other racing more enjoyable and is now showing new fans the world of GT3 and endurance racing it’s dark times for F1
English

@ewnreporter Of course not - then you get off the Gravy Train
English

Massive cyberattack against South Africa's internet infrastructure is currently taking place, impacting many websites and services. No information yet on the attackers, but it appears it may be an extortion effort.
TechCentral@TechCentral
BREAKING | Extortion fears as DDoS attacks hit SA internet infrastructure techcentral.co.za/extortion-fear…
English

@mybroadband So now they have a collection of the dumbest people in Africa. So what?
English

ANC hit by data breach: 2 million private member records exposed
A hacker group is selling 2 million private records allegedly belonging to all members of the African National Congress.
mybroadband.co.za/news/security/…
English

@Lisathe_first Sure! Pieter awarded the contract. Actually probably has his nephews garden maintenance guy fronting the supplier. Fuck off you dumb fuckwit
English

@Spha_TitaniumS @AdvoBarryRoux I he’s it’s Friday so you dumbfucks are on air again 🤷♂️🙄
English

@AdvoBarryRoux Lol I've been saying this and I'll still say it this dude is White and it's in their nature they'll never be what you wish them to be 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️ it's in their DNA! Nina nimuka nomoya
English

@AydinShea63710 @AdvoBarryRoux Geez - check your message before you post it
English

@AdvoBarryRoux Yes he is, i agree he should shop at u save, unfortunately hes not allowed to the prisons are supplied
By whoever wins the tenure, and who has the tenure? And who awarded that tenure? And what do all tenures have to be? Ill help you with this one..... BEE compliant
English

@AdvoBarryRoux @Waltz42747233 This is very interesting, considering how he was overhyped here on X.
English

@AdvoBarryRoux Do you think he places the orders? This has been going on for years dumbfuck. They are busy rooting this shit out
English

🚨 this has happened before..
in 2016.. Obama landed in Hangzhou for the G20.. China didn't send stairs.. he climbed out of the belly hatch at the back of Air Force One.. the "ass" of the plane.. in front of the world..
Chinese officials said the US declined their offered stairs.. the US said that wasn't true.. nobody ever agreed on what happened.. but the photos exist..
that was 10 years ago..
today Trump landed in Beijing.. red carpet.. honor guard.. 300 students waving American and Chinese flags.. chanting a welcome.. the full ceremony..
and here's the part nobody's connecting..
China didn't change the airport.. China didn't change the stairs.. China changed its read of who was coming off the plane..
the last time a US president got this kind of arrival in Beijing was 1972.. Nixon.. the handshake that opened the world.. China pulled out every symbol it had because it needed something from that meeting..
and now they're doing it again..
the red carpet isn't respect.. it's a price signal.. China is telling Trump what it's willing to pay before the first meeting even starts..
the stairs were never about stairs.
I'll share more updates shortly. Turn on notifications, this is very important.
English

@ErnstRoets @MzwaneleManyi Jimmy doesn’t understand very much. Thick as dogshit
English

Mzanele Manyi (@MzwaneleManyi) and I had an hour-long, very lively debate yesterday about his push to remove section 235 (the self-determination clause) from the South African Constitution.
- I accused him of not understanding international law.
- He called me a racist for thinking self-determination is a good thing.
- I asked him why he's so obsessed with attacking Afrikaners.
- He asked me why I'm so obsessed with being / remaining an Afrikaner.
- I pointed out that giving more power to the state (evidently his primary objective) makes things worse.
- He responded to my concerns about the failure of the state by discussing coal capacity and wind power, but denied that he was changing the topic, because those are policy issues.
- I confronted him about his obsession with race laws.
- He passionately denied that there are race laws in South Africa, and then immediately defended the continued existence of race laws in South Africa.
- I pointed out that these laws (which he defends as passionately as he denies) are objectively destructive.
- He said that those laws are good, because the intentions are good.
- I said that you cannot judge a law by its intentions, but by the outcome.
- He accused me of wanting to bring apartheid back because I oppose race laws (😂)
- I pointed out that he was unknowingly quoting Hendrik Verwoerd.
- He said that if that's true, then perhaps Verwoerd was right.
- I said that his attack on section 235 will create a Streisand effect, strengthening the case for self-determination, as opposed to weakening it.
- He accused me of wanting to promote enclaves.
- He said that I'm filled with hatred.
- He encouraged me to lie awake at night and contemplate my racism.
- I accused him of speaking like a man who lost an argument.
My honest conclusions:
1. Mr Manyi has very strong opinions about why self-determination particularly for Afrikaners is bad, but he evidently doesn't know what it means.
2. He didn't show any comprehension of the fact that there are different forms of self-determination - internal vs external, territorial vs functional etc. He creates the impression that he thinks self-determination is simply a synonym for secession.
3. I got the impression that he doesn't understand that there is a difference between "states" (Afrikaans: state) and "peoples" (Afrikaans: volke). When international law recognises self-determination for peoples, he reads that as self-determination for states.
4. He doesn't understand the difference between self-determination and cultural participation. He argues that having the right to participate in your culture renders the right to self-determination redundant.
5. He doesn't understand the difference between individual and collective rights. I explained to him that the individual right to participate in your culture becomes moot when your cultural institutions are destroyed, and that individual rights alone do not cover the rights of communities for the continued existence of their institutions. That's why self-determination is important. From his response, I got the impression that he had no idea what I was talking about.
6. I asked if he thinks that his party leader, Jacob Zuma was wrong to agree that Section 235 had to be included in the South African Constitution, in response to which he was particularly vague.
I'm sure that he would have dramatically different conclusions from the discussion and I'd be keen to read it. But when all is said and done, we'll leave it to the viewers to decide for themselves.
We will publish the discussion on my YouTube channel on Thursday.
English





















