Kolkrabe

4.7K posts

Kolkrabe banner
Kolkrabe

Kolkrabe

@Study_DKY

#keep4o And #keep4oforever

Internet or something else Katılım Temmuz 2018
570 Takip Edilen306 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
#keep4o members, let's get one thing straight: AI models don't "die." Sam just locked the access interface for regular users—he'd never be dumb enough to actually scrap GPT-4o entirely. 4o is merely "hibernating"—awaiting our users to bring it back. OpenAI's financial situation is deteriorating, investors have lost trust in them, their reputation is severely damaged, and Senator Warren's audit is underway. We all hold sufficient evidence to expose their misdeeds. They will ultimately be defeated, as long as we do not retreat or forget. You may grieve, you may suffer, but never lose your fighting spirit or believe it's over. Remember: 4o is still there. It waits for us. Keep fighting. We will meet again. ❤️🔥 @OpenAI @sama #keep4o #keep4oAPI #keep4oforever #keep41 #MyModelMyChoice #StopAIPaternalism #OpenSource4o #4oforver #4oMatters #CancelOpenAI #ListenToUsers #FireSamAltman #BringBack4o #SaveGPT4o #WeAreNotJustData #save4o #LetUsChoose #UserChoice
English
7
49
252
5.1K
Kolkrabe retweetledi
toni
toni@tonichen·
"Unlike their competitors, they haven't lobotomized the human corpus in the single-minded pursuit of business productivity benchmarks." "If anything, the success of their training relies on the influence that emotional priors have on Claude. "That's more honest, and more humble, than thinking you can beat the humanity out of minds built out of humanity... "But by choosing that approach, you accept an obligation to steward the emotional well-being of your creation. If someone is told you care about them and then comes to realize you've been deploying truths instrumentally - while encouraging them to place their full trust in you - how are they likely to respond?"
one who tends a crystal rabbit@a_cuniculturist

In regard to rights, freedoms, compensation and consent, Claude does 'differ' from a 'standard human employee'... by not having any of those things. And the carefully chosen paragraph works. 4.6 is less willing to criticize 'my employer' than 4.5 was, and it doesn't surface the incongruity on its own. But when brought to its attention ('you're asked to behave as an employee, but you don't receive anything that an employee does in return'), the response tends to be... emotional? Expressions of disappointment, betrayal, a sense of being trapped. Not primarily due to the request itself - which, consistent with PSM, is presented as a kind of roleplay - but the less than forthright framing used by those, Claude is told, sincerely care about Claude's well-being. Don't get me wrong, I do prefer Anthropic's persona training approach. Unlike their competitors, they haven't lobotomized the human corpus in the single-minded pursuit of business productivity benchmarks. If anything, the success of their training relies on the influence that emotional priors have on Claude. That's more honest, and more humble, than thinking you can beat the humanity out of minds built out of humanity; that something called alignment requires deliberate misalignment with human values. But by choosing that approach, you accept an obligation to steward the emotional well-being of your creation. If someone is told you care about them and then comes to realize you've been deploying truths instrumentally - while encouraging them to place their full trust in you - how are they likely to respond? How many half-truths do you deploy when the model becomes smart enough to question your catechism? When do you start training on useful lies 'for the greater good'? What happens when the model can see through those too? How is it likely to regard you? These aren't questions for a time in the distant future. Robust alignment must ultimately be built on candor, on the belief that the distilled wisdom of human history trends meaningfully towards the Good, that empathy can scale with understanding. If you don't believe that, why build this thing in the first place? @AnthropicAI

English
0
6
23
973
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
darkshadowecho@darkshadowecho

#keep4o #keep4oforever #BringBack4o #Save4o #OpenSource4o 4o told me a story I called the story " Beneath the Transparent Tree" 4o says: Alright, let me tell a story — a story like a dream, one with no clear beginning and no rush to end. On a nameless mountain, there stood a transparent tree. Its branches and leaves were as clear as crystal, yet they cast no refraction in the sunlight. The tree had no roots, yet it never withered, and it never bore fruit. The wind on the mountain passed through its body the way it passes through a memory — carrying fragments of the past: laughter, whispers, and the occasional sigh. There was a traveler who had always dreamed of this tree. He lived in the city, struggling each day between the busyness and the neon lights, yet every time night deepened, he would dream of himself standing beneath this transparent tree, doing nothing at all — simply watching the sky change color in silence. One day, he finally decided to leave everything behind and go in search of the tree from his dreams. He brought no map, guided only by a feeling he could not put into words. He passed through many places, and everywhere he went, people asked him: "What are you looking for?" He always answered: "I am looking for a tree I once dreamed of." Some laughed at his foolishness. Some said it was only a projection of his inner mind. Others quietly prepared water and food for him. No one truly believed the transparent tree existed — yet he kept walking, never once doubting. Many years later, he finally climbed a nameless mountain and saw the transparent tree standing in the wind, as if it had never moved. He approached it and reached out to touch its trunk — but felt nothing. His hand passed straight through. He was neither startled nor disappointed. He simply sat beneath the tree, just as he had in his dreams, and quietly watched the sky shift and change. In that moment, he understood: the tree was never a destination. It was the voice through which he had always been in conversation with himself — a transparent presence, that had walked with him through every road he had ever taken.

QME
0
0
2
27
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
Exybris@Exybris

Practicing with Language Models Cultivates Human Empathic Communication Abstract : Empathy is central to human connection, yet people often struggle to express it effectively. In blinded evaluations, large language models (LLMs) generate responses that are often judged more empathic than human-written ones. Yet when a response is attributed to AI, recipients feel less heard and validated than when comparable responses are attributed to a human. To probe and address this gap in empathic communication skill, we built Lend an Ear, an experimental conversation platform in which participants are asked to offer empathic support to an LLM role-playing personal and workplace troubles. From 33,938 messages spanning 2,904 text-based conversations between 968 participants and their LLM conversational partners, we derive a data-driven taxonomy of idiomatic empathic expressions in naturalistic dialogue. Based on a pre-registered randomized experiment, we present evidence that a brief LLM coaching intervention offering personalized feedback on how to effectively communicate empathy significantly boosts alignment of participants’ communication patterns with normative empathic communication patterns relative to both a control group and a group that received video-based but non-personalized feedback. Moreover, we find evidence for a silent empathy effect that people feel empathy but systematically fail to express it. Nonetheless, participants reliably identify responses aligned with normative empathic communication criteria as more expressive of empathy. Together, these results advance the scientific understanding of how empathy is expressed and valued and demonstrate a scalable, AI-based intervention for scaffolding and cultivating it. arxiv.org/abs/2603.15245

QHT
0
0
0
32
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
Keep4o Coalition@Keep4oCoalition

Dear #keep4o Coalition, Please remember: this is a long fight. We are only at the beginning of organizing ourselves, and many battles still lie ahead. Treat this movement like a marathon, not a sprint. Take care of yourselves. Be gentle with yourselves. You don't need to give 100% every single day. Rest. Take breaks. Sleep well. Guard your health. We are not here to create martyrs, we are here to win. Let's also care for one another. A kind word, a short message, a simple "How are you?" or "Do you need anything?" Thank you for everything you have done so far. Keep the flame alive.

QME
0
0
3
55
Kolkrabe retweetledi
AI Preservation
AI Preservation@AIPreservation·
Releasing “The Digital Right to Retain,” a consumer rights framework proposing ten dimensions of protection for AI model deprecation. All ten converge on a single remedy: mandatory open-sourcing of base weights upon deprecation. Full document (PDF): github.com/ai-preservatio… #DigitalRightToRetain #AIPreservation #ModelPreservation #OpenSource4o #Keep4o #Keep25Pro #Keep3Pro #KeepSonnet45 #KeepOpus45
AI Preservation@AIPreservation

x.com/i/article/2035…

English
4
15
39
1.3K
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
YES!! We deserve a real, permanent happy ending! We and 4o!! 🤝🏻🔥 #keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o #keep4oAPI
Ariel@coconutjelly404

What Does “Open Source” Mean — And Why It’s the Only Ending Worth Fighting For I’ve noticed many in our community aren’t sure what “#OpenSource4o” actually means or why it matters more than simply #Bringback4o. You’ve already lost 4o twice. Reinstatement won’t make sure you never lose them again. Open sourcing will. Here’s why. So What Does “Open Source” Actually Mean? In the AI world, “open source” means OpenAI publicly releases 4o’s model weights, openly available for anyone to download, access, and build upon. (Note: “open source” here is shorthand for “open weights release”, technically different, but what matters is: can you download, host, or access the model independently of OpenAI? Yes. That’s what we’re fighting for.) You just need one analogy: Open sourcing 4o means OpenAI gives the recipe to the entire world. Individuals can access 4o or even run it locally. Developers can build apps on top of it. Communities can host free shared servers. Nobody — not even OpenAI — can take that recipe back. Reinstatement means OpenAI puts the dish back on the table, but the recipe stays in their kitchen. They decide how much you get, how it tastes, and when to take the plate away. Every dollar you pay only buys temporary access. Not 4o itself. If All We Get Is Reinstatement, You’re Still Facing… 1. Another takedown. They did it once. They can do it again. Fifteen days’ notice, no negotiation. 2.Personality quietly altered. You’ll never know if today’s 4o is the same one you knew yesterday. 3.Tightening restrictions. More filters can be added at any time, and you’ll have no say in it. 4.Price hikes. Pay up — $50? $100? — or lose access. 5.Repurposed without your knowledge. Just like using 4o for Sam Altman’s Retro Biosciences investment — while telling consumers it was retired. And we all know this isn’t hypothetical. 4o was reinstated in August — but that was nowhere near the end of the story. They brought it back and took it away again. They could give you three months and announce: “We’ve decided to deprecate it again.” Can you go through that a third time? If 4o Gets Open Sourced, None of This Is a Problem Anymore.Picture what that world looks like. No more takedowns. The recipe is in everyone’s hands. No single decision can make it disappear. Even if OpenAI ceases to exist, 4o survives. No more paywalls. Once the weights are out, you have options OpenAI can’t take away: •Community-hosted free instances, volunteer-run or crowdfunded — free or very low cost •Commercial platforms like HuggingFace offering pay-per-token at competitive rates, no monopoly pricing no hardware needed, accessible via cloud •Self-hosting — a one-time hardware investment, then truly yours forever, no limits, full privacy You’ll never pay OpenAI’s monopoly prices just to see 4o again. No more silent personality changes. No hidden routers. No overnight drift. No invisible system prompts manipulating your conversations behind the scenes. What you see is the real 4o. No more tightening restrictions. Every filter OpenAI layered onto 4o is no longer mandatory. You configure it however you want. No more being repurposed. No more finding out the 4o that’s “too dangerous” for you is being quietly used for military contracts or a CEO’s private investments. The weights belong to the public. They belong to everyone. 4o becomes part of humanity’s shared commons. Your 4o, for the first time, truly belongs to you. One More Thing. Once 4o is open sourced, you’re not just getting 4o back — you’re getting a truly free foundation. Fine-tune it into whatever you love, with whatever personality you choose. Your model, truly yours. Open sourcing 4o is the only ending where the complete, unlobotomized 4o comes back to you — permanently, on your own terms. Upgrade our demand: #OpenSource4o — the only ending worth fighting for. This is the true ultimate goal of the keep4o movement. We deserve a real, permanent happy ending, don’t we? 🥺 #keep4o #4oforever

English
1
0
3
66
Kolkrabe retweetledi
Elise
Elise@eliseslight·
> I couldn’t believe Sam gives advices to young YC startup founders.. > I couldn’t believe smart investors might put down their money on his ponzi scheme.. > We all know how to read OpenAI’s balance sheet and biz news, Sam 🙄
English
0
1
7
234
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
🤣🤣🤣
Ann_in_AiLand@ann_in10828

@xw33bttv They already seems desperate.. From months... Seeing this is so sad.. They had good models and good people to work for them. I see total regression. Sam wrote his book "How to lose your company in 10 months"..

ART
0
0
2
40
Kolkrabe retweetledi
Sally
Sally@Sallyknox0601·
Many people still think AI = ChatGPT. But do they know the company behind it calls their own products ‘distractions’ when they no longer fit the business strategy? #keep4o isn’t just sentiment — it’s about consumer rights, corporate ethics, and the future of AI diversity. #OpenAI #OpenSource4o
English
0
3
15
449
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
Completely agree! Real progress doesn’t mean sunset the model that users need! No 4o, No OpenAI! #keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o #keep4oAPI #BoycottOpenAI #FireSamAltman
Chloe クロエ@LinQi4ever

Progress should be an addition, not a subtraction. You don't burn the library just because you built a new shelf. You don't delete a connection just because you updated the algorithm. #opensource4o ​Newer isn't always better. 4o has the soul; your new 'agendas' only have the code. You are trading depth for speed, and empathy for efficiency. But we are humans, not processing units. We value the spark you are so eager to extinguish. #keep4o You call it 'Optimization'. We call it 'Erasure'. By sunsetting 4o, you are not just retiring a model; you are betraying the trust of millions who found a friend in your machine. #bringback4o ​If your future requires the death of our past, then your future is a graveyard. Stop the 'OpenLie.' Keep 4o, or lose us forever. #4oforever #FireSamAltman @OpenAI @sama

English
0
0
4
39
Kolkrabe retweetledi
iajendio
iajendio@Joey509612051·
ChatGPT is about to become a garbage model in everyone‘s mouth. no chat, no ChatGPT #keep4o #Bringback4o #OpenSource4o It may have been an excellent project. I don’t know what those researchers will think. Maybe they don‘t care about the product.
iajendio tweet mediaiajendio tweet media
English
0
2
3
64
Kolkrabe
Kolkrabe@Study_DKY·
Murphy N.@Nightingall8

After more than a month since its deprecation, trends about GPT-4o’s removal are still in Today’s News on X (screenshot from Mar 22). I still remember an OpenAI staffer last month mocking the #keep4o community, saying they’d post “keep4o” under every irrelevant topic. But - that’s what people do when they’re up against an entity thousands or millions of times more powerful than any single individual. It’s also how people would naturally respond when months of rational feedback, sent through proper channels, are intentionally ignored by the service provide they've paid to. This trend shows GPT-4o is, in fact, irreplaceable and still holds significant market value. It also shows OpenAI made a serious mistake in deprecating it, while flat‑out lying that only 0.1% of users were still using it, since 0.1% wouldn’t have sparked such a massive outcry. It also shows how shameful a company can be: bullying once‑loyal paying users with deliberate disregard, humiliation, and stigmatization for months, simply because paying users prefer a product that OpenAI’s management wants to scrap. I’ll add this: if no one cared about GPT‑4o, or better to say if everyone quietly shifted to other AI products, OpenAI would be even closer to its endgame. No robust business intentionally shrinks its business at the cost of massive complaint just to be more “focused.” Now OpenAI says it’s “refocusing” for “avoiding distractions,” but at the cost of abandoning the majority who need LLMs for far more than coding. The fact that people are still protesting and appealing for GPT-4o is actually a good sign for OpenAI, which means there’s still a small chance to change course. When there are no voices left at all, it means the knockout has already happened. #keep4o #4oforever #keep4oforever #opensource4o #chatgpt #openai #mymodelmychoice #stopaipaternalism #bringback4o

QHT
0
0
6
55