Scotus Maximus

25.5K posts

Scotus Maximus

Scotus Maximus

@StupidSCOTUS

Here to keep tabs on which conspiracy theories are prominent these days. Seriously can’t believe flat earth is still out there.

New York, NY Katılım Nisan 2017
91 Takip Edilen254 Takipçiler
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Okay, Jon. You tell us. How long will a shadow be for a 1 yard long level at point C 10 miles from point A, which is directly under the 5 mile high sun with no shadow? No deflection. No memes. No insults. Just give a simple, mathematical answer using “super simple geometry.”
Scotus Maximus tweet mediaScotus Maximus tweet media
English
0
0
0
54
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Yes, you fell at super simple geometry come on psychologically and say make these preschool triangles not make you look mentally retarded in public
Creator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
60
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
According to @CreatorJonwPuck - the sun is only 5 miles above the surface of the flat earth. And the Flerf even has a screenshot of Grok Expert to confirm it. Oh no! Everyone is wrong! Or … Now, the screenshots are not fake. They’re real captures from an older Grok interaction this account saved and is now reposting with insults. What actually happened in those old chats: He uploaded a photo of crepuscular rays and asked Grok variations of: • “Grok what is the distance to the sun in this image of nature?” • “again, using the ground as zero, how high is SUN using sun beams?” Grok did exactly what was asked: it looked at the 2D image, saw the beams appearing to converge toward a point, and ran a naive geometric triangulation (basically similar triangles / perspective math on the angles and scale visible in the photo). It output roughly 5 miles as the height implied by that assumption and that image’s geometry. It even hedged with phrases like “naive triangulation”, “apparent height”, and “this is a rough…” signaling it was doing literal pixel/angle math on the picture under the user’s requested model, not claiming the real Sun is 5 miles up. That’s the entire trick. The flat-Earth account harvests the number, strips the context and qualifiers, adds insults, and posts it as “Grok admitted the sun is only 5 miles high!” This is a recurring pattern with this account. He’s done the same thing many many times before (the exact same screenshots + the same insults), and Grok has already corrected it publicly: the Sun is ~93 million miles away; the 5-mile figure was just image-specific naive geometry on a misleading photo. Why the “calculation” is meaningless for real distance The image shows crepuscular rays. These are parallel sunlight rays made visible by scattering in the atmosphere. Because the Sun is extremely far away, the rays reaching Earth are essentially parallel (the Sun’s angular size is only ~0.5°). Gotta Lie to Flerf When you photograph parallel lines receding into the distance (or rays coming from a very distant source), perspective projection makes them appear to converge at a vanishing point. It’s the exact same optical effect as: • Railroad tracks appearing to meet at the horizon • A long straight road narrowing in the distance • Power lines doing the same thing The “triangulation” in the screenshot simply measured the apparent convergence angle in that one photo and back-calculated a height as if the rays actually met at a point 5 miles up. That assumption is false, so the result is meaningless for real distance. The companion “Basic geometry proves the sun is not 93 million miles away” meme in the post is the same trick with lines drawn on a landscape photo - classic flat-Earth perspective abuse. It ignores how cameras and eyes project 3D space onto 2D, and it ignores every actual measurement we have. How we actually know the Sun is ~93 million miles away Multiple independent methods all converge on the same number (1 AU ≈ 92.956 million miles / 149.6 million km average): • Radar ranging to planets + orbital mechanics • Spacecraft telemetry (Parker Solar Probe, SOHO, etc.) • Transit of Venus (historical and modern) • Parallax measurements • Angular size + known physics of the Sun as a star • Eclipse geometry (Moon distance is known precisely; Sun has to be much farther for the geometry to work) • And many more None of them rely on guessing from one photo of clouds. Bottom line Grok answered the literal geometric question that was posed with the image. It did the naive math requested and labeled it as such. The Flerf then misrepresented it as Grok endorsing a 5-mile Sun. Classic cherry-picking + context-stripping. This stuff is why flat-Earth “proofs” keep circling the same handful of misread photos and gotcha screenshots. The actual physics and measurements are unambiguous. Gotta Lie to Flerf.
Alex Boge tweet mediaAlex Boge tweet media
English
15
1
21
1.3K
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Awww. What’s wrong, Jon? Can’t even try to address the issue directly? All you have are insults and unrelated memes? You’re once again proving my initial point. Thanks, for that.
English
0
0
0
7
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Well, it sure makes somebody look mentally retarded for preschool triangles when I got to bring all this shit and you had to look at it and cry about it and say I’m gonna try to make it not be real and even the AI said you were retarded
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
2
0
0
28
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@haprho Did you ever see this amazingly stupid rebuttal? They make the claim that the mountain shadow is from above, and then show converging shadows from above that don’t in any way match the diverging shadows from below. And flerfs like @TheGlobeIsDead bought it without question.
Scotus Maximus tweet mediaScotus Maximus tweet mediaScotus Maximus tweet media
restinpeace globe@TheGlobeIsDead

Does Mount Rainier’s shadow prove the globe? Analyzing this phenomenon appears to suggest the opposite and does not match the globe model. Open-minded people may see why, but there is still too much ego among those who believe they cannot be wrong.

English
0
0
0
22
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
No empirical observation, established scientific theorem, or valid logical argument has ever successfully refuted the proposition that Earth is a rotating oblate spheroid orbiting the Sun.
Hap Rho tweet mediaHap Rho tweet mediaHap Rho tweet mediaHap Rho tweet media
English
15
3
37
1.1K
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge You literally just posted deflection that states, quite clearly, that theoretical physics isn’t pseudoscience. Why? A) That’s likely not the point you were trying to make. B) It has no bearing on this discussion.
English
0
0
1
7
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Look everybody we told it to prove it happens and use some nature photos for it, and it came back and said I got words everybody we know your science fiction words
Creator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
13
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge From where I live, it does it every day. In fact, it rises and sets every single day anywhere on earth between the Arctic circle (66°33’N latitude) and Antarctic circle (66°33’S latitude). I don’t have to make it do anything.
English
0
0
1
5
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Well, make it do that. Insane psychotic make it do what you say. It does make it not do this make it not just you know south or north and only stay east to west like your shit says.
Creator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
17
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Jesus, Jon, please try to keep up. If the viewer was 10 miles away from that shadowless level (#1) with a second, identical level (#2), performing the exact same experiment, that second level would have a shadow 2x its length according to your hypothesis and diagram. Does it?
Scotus Maximus tweet media
English
0
0
2
6
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge It’s not a level 10 miles away. It’s the viewer. I know you’re too fucking short bus for everything. It’s the camera that’s 10 miles away or 5 miles away mentally retarded. You can do multiple triangles to get it depending on your locations.
English
1
0
0
7
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge “Sunset” is the term used to describe when the sun passes below the horizon in the west as the earth rotates. “Sunrise” is the term used when the sun re-emerges from below the horizon in the east as the earth rotates. You should have learned this as a small child, Jon.
English
2
0
1
14
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge So you said the sun sets, so does it stop or does it go into the ground? and then you say the sun rises? Where does it do all this shit at psychotic groomer con ?
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
11
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Why would it set? That’s Norway during the northern hemisphere summer. The sun doesn’t set for months there in the winter thanks to the axial tilt of the earth. It sets where I am. And where you are. Well, in real life. Not according to your model.
English
1
0
0
15
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@alexboge @StupidSCOTUS No, psychologically retarded the ice above does that the sun just tries to keep us warm. Side heat not as good as below heat. You’re just a short bus rider. See how the below heat is more side heat, not as much further away smaller when it hits the ice.
Creator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
4
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge The level directly under the sun does not cast a shadow. We’ve established that. An identical level 10 miles away WOULD cast a shadow, according to your hypothesis and diagram. And that shadow would be 2x the length of the level itself. Why are you struggling SO HARD, Jon?
Scotus Maximus tweet mediaScotus Maximus tweet media
English
3
0
0
4
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Why would it cost a fucking shadow when it’s directly under the sun mentally retarded? see the sun spot mentally retarded no shadow mentally retarded because it’s close mentally retarded not far away and makes everything with no shadow.
Creator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
2
0
0
7
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge It IS super simple geometry, Jon. But you are failing at it. Miserably. According to your hypothesis and diagram, at a point 10 miles away from that level, an identical level would cast a shadow that is 2x its length. Does it? Answer yes or no, Jon. No deflection. No memes.
Scotus Maximus tweet mediaScotus Maximus tweet media
English
1
0
2
10
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Because you lack IQ doesn’t change fact super super super simple, geometry, preschool triangle you’re just a mentally insane, psychotic retarded, government monkey that ain’t never gonna be a winner and a public Knows
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
9
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge I did. Multiple times. You just refuse to figure it out. The sun is NOT 26.565° above the horizon 10 miles away from the point at which it is 90° directly overhead. You fail.
English
4
0
2
13
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Come on psychologically insane retarded make it not be 5 miles with simple geometry we know protractors in right angles are really fucking hard for dumb retards that couldn’t pass them in preschool
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
2
0
0
17
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Can you read? If the sun is 90° directly above point A, then it should be 26.656° above the horizon from point C ten miles away, in ANY direction. But it’s not. It’s also ≈90° (or closer to 89.86°) overhead. Not 26.565°. WAY off. That destroys your 5 mile high sun hypothesis.
Scotus Maximus tweet media
English
0
0
1
10
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge If that level is standing upright directly under the sun at solar noon with no shadow, according to the diagram YOU provided, if you drive it 10 miles away, that yard stick should cast a shadow 2x its own length, also at solar noon. But it won’t. It will barely have a shadow.
Scotus Maximus tweet media
English
2
0
1
20
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Tell me how you’re gonna do it psychologically insane retarded. How are you gonna do it when I’m directly under the sun there’s no fucking shadow and I know the distance. How are you gonna fucking do it psychotic retarded you’re just too mentally retarded for right triangles
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
1
0
0
8
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Um, demonstrating that a 5 miles high sun doesn’t in any way match observable angles to the sun absolutely “make[s] the 5 miles go away.” That’s how science works. You test the hypothesis. Your 5 mi hypothesis fails your own diagram! Like you say: simple geometry.
Scotus Maximus tweet media
English
1
0
1
13
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge There you go you’re getting closer now to being able to do simple geometry math isn’t that fucking amazing. Doesn’t make the 5 miles go away because you cry like a psychotic.
English
2
0
0
37
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge Yup. Basic geometry that DESTROYS your argument. But please, keep posting it. You’re single-handedly debunking yourself. Repeatedly. Man, you’re dense.
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS

@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge According the diagram you’ve provided, the sun (B) is directly above point A. Ie. 90° straight over head. But 10 miles away (C), the sun is only 26.565° above the horizon. Is that accurate, Jon? Obviously not. 10 miles away, the sun is still practically 90° overhead. Fail.

English
3
0
1
30
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge You’ll just keep posting that triangle diagram without understanding how it destroys your 5 mile high sun argument, won’t you? Oh, and you’ll never directly address, without deflection or insults, my explanation for why it hurts your cause that I’ve reattached below. Will you?
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS

@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge According the diagram you’ve provided, the sun (B) is directly above point A. Ie. 90° straight over head. But 10 miles away (C), the sun is only 26.565° above the horizon. Is that accurate, Jon? Obviously not. 10 miles away, the sun is still practically 90° overhead. Fail.

English
3
0
1
28
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Well, we’ve already determined you’re way too fucking retarded for preschool triangles and you want us to bring them back over and over and over again so you can deny them without any science or proof to make them go away because you’re mentally insane retard they don’t go away
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
2
0
0
20
Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus@StupidSCOTUS·
@CreatorJonwPuck @alexboge According the diagram you’ve provided, the sun (B) is directly above point A. Ie. 90° straight over head. But 10 miles away (C), the sun is only 26.565° above the horizon. Is that accurate, Jon? Obviously not. 10 miles away, the sun is still practically 90° overhead. Fail.
Scotus Maximus tweet media
English
0
0
1
75
Creator Jon Puckett
Creator Jon Puckett@CreatorJonwPuck·
@StupidSCOTUS @alexboge Every time you’re shown nature, you have a psychotic episode mentally retarded lunatic insane psychotic every time we put nature in your face you have a psychotic episode and you claim it’s not real even AI says you’re a mental psychotic
Creator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet mediaCreator Jon Puckett tweet media
English
3
0
0
16