Village boys Movement Enugu(042) Branch

INEC Partisan Chairman - Amupitan must go!

Nigerians: 1000 boko haram transported to Abuja FCT Nigeria.

BREAKING: INEC Chairman locks his X account amid controversy. Deleting posts won’t change anything calls for his resignation continue.

ADC Protest enters DAY 3 with large support from Nigerians who have resolved to vote out APC come 2027. APC go hear, ADC no be LP

One beautiful thing about the northerners is that when they offer to love you, they love you for real. Peter Obi is the next president.

Day 3 of ADC Protest Sen. @_dinomelaye on ground again. #OccupyINEC #AmupitanMustGo

Yes, joashamupitan existed on X. It belongs to Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan (INEC Chairman, account ID 1567086242164101120, created Sept 2022). The username changed to Sundayvibe00 earlier today (now protected, labeled "Parody Account") after old pro-APC posts resurfaced. Same account—X tracks via fixed ID.

Joash Amupitan has now been confirmed to be a Tinubu fanboy through his 2023 pro APC posts. Guess what their response was? Renaming his Twitter handle to make it look like some sort of parody account and locking it. Forgetting that your username history is a public knowledge that cannot be completely erased especially with Grok now being in the picture. And the fact that we let these kinds of morons do these things to us and get away with them is why I’m actually livid.

Inec chairman Mr Ojo Amupitan come see urself oooo.

BUSTED: Deleted Tweet Exposes INEC Boss Joash Amupitan As Bonafide Card Carrying Member Of APC parallelfactsnews.com/old-but-now-de…

Secret footages from Boko Haram Rehabilitation center in Gombe state. Repentant Boko Haram insurgents being armed, getting prepared to fight side by side with the Nigerian military as civilian JTF.

While Nigeria Loses Military Brass To Terror Attacks, Tinubu Raises Funds To Rehabilitate ‘Repentant’ Militants From ₦50bn To ₦115bn parallelfactsnews.com/tinubu-raises-…

NBA Threatens To Sanction Lawyers Who Drag Courts Into Political Party Disputes, Warns Judges | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/3PZwg9e

BREAKING: Nigerian Airspace Management Agency warns that the country could soon lose its ability to effectively monitor aircraft within its airspace due to ageing radar infrastructure.

Abia ADC disowns Obinna, backs David Mark leadership The Abia State caucus of the African Democratic Congress,ADC, has distanced the party from the actions of Mr. Don Norman Obinna, stressing that he lacks the authority to act or speak as the party chairman in the state. vanguardngr.com/2026/04/abia-a…

This is the only way out of our current situation as Nigerians by Mojeed Dahiru — A must watch for all Nigerians 🇳🇬

Igbos too dey there

Good morning Nigerians I am an ADC registered member and I will put my all in building my party!!!! In David Mark’s leadership We Stand #UnitedForADC #ThisTooShallPass adcregistration.ng

@Olusola70406607 @NigBarAssoc Why did your druggie assent to electoral act and made it law

@NigBarAssoc In other words if a party is hijack or criminality involved where signature were forged or the party constitution were violated, court should not interfere. NBA that’s a joke and u know it.

OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.

@idofoi @NigBarAssoc Why did your druggie assent to electoral act and made it law

@NigBarAssoc What exactly are you saying??? If someone feel cheated, he should not approach the court for a legal redress or he should take laws into his hands?