💛 I’m perfectly fine 💛

🚨 THIS COWARD BOY MORGAN REES, 21, BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF AN 85-YEAR-OLD MAN THEN STOLE HIS VAN Morgan Rees from Middle Wallop, Stockbridge — you’re no man, you’re a pathetic little boy. After a night out drinking, this scumbag launched a savage unprovoked attack on a defenceless 85-year-old pensioner sitting in his van. He punched him repeatedly, dragged him out onto the ground, kicked him multiple times, tried to slam the car door on his legs, then stole the van and drove off leaving the old man injured. The victim said the attack has left him terrified to go out alone, constantly thinking about it, and he now has to be extra careful because of the damage to his eye socket. Salisbury Crown Court gave him just 3 years and 4 months for Section 18 GBH. Pick on someone your own size you weak, pathetic cunt. Attacking an 85-year-old? There’s no lower form of life. Name him. Share his face. Show everyone what a spineless thug looks like. Protect our elderly. These cowardly attacks on the vulnerable are getting ridiculous. No mercy for scum like this.

@TheSwiftSociety Because it’s her best album 🩵

🏆| “1989” (2014) has now surpassed 10.5 Billion Spotify Streams!

@MbarkCherguia @u_keik Stupid wife needs to put that phone down and let her man do his job

A father confronts a registered sex offender after catching him speaking to his 6-year-old daughter. Is the dad right or wrong for doing this?

I read everywhere about the 'hard right' This the term used to describe people who are Islamosceptic - that is, people who are doubtful about the merits of a religion that demands child marriage, the beating of women, and death to all who oppose it Perhaps 'sensible right' would be a better description

@Hugoolivery0 ME! Its so fun I don’t get why it gets so much hate

What is one song everyone in your fandom dislike but you love !?!

Fawzia Amin Sido was only 10 when she was kidnapped by ISIS from her Yazidi village in Iraq. She was sold multiple times in Syria, and forced to marry a Palestinian terrorist who would kill Yazidi babies and force her to eat them. She gave birth to two children. When her abductor was killed, she was smuggled into Gaza via Egypt and forced to marry his brother, a Hamas terrorist. She was sexually enslaved again. His family also tortured her and called her a devil worshipper for being Yazidi. After the Gaza war broke out, her husband was killed in an Israeli airstrike. And she was forced to work in hospitals to care for injured Hamas terrorists. She eventually was able to get hold of a phone and posted videos on TikTok asking for help. Fawzia was rescued in a joint Israeli-American operation in October 2024, after over 10 years of enslavement. She had to leave her children behind because the terrorist’s family wouldn’t let her take them. Fawzia later stated that she never experienced kindness from a single Gazan and that they treated her worse than ISIS. She also claimed all hospitals she was forced to work were used as military bases by Hamas. Pro-Palestinian activists completely dismissed her story and accused her of lying because Palestinians “would never be capable of such evil.”

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

@taylorlilacs Lover ❤️

If you could only choose one, what would it be??

@TimMcGirl Not the Holy Trinity (Red,1989, Reputation) only coming in at number 5 😢

🚨 Official Taylor Swift album ranking by the fandom !!

Well, you guys are shocked by such news because you are reading it this way: 27 Muslims raped a single woman. In Islam, you read it differently: 27 Muslims used an object. In Islam, non-Muslim women are whores, and when conditions allow, using them for sex is the only use. Of course many Muslims reject this BS, but they reject it not because of Islam but in spite of it.

Many migrants entering the UK have a tendency going to parks and watch British children. There are reported cases where Afghan asylum seekers have been convicted of raping children they approached in UK parks: one 23-year-old abducted and raped a 12-year-old girl after spotting her on swings in Nuneaton in 2025, sentenced to 15 years; another raped a 17-year-old in an Elgin park and got nine years. Two young Afghan asylum seekers also raped a 15-year-old in a Warwickshire park. This is who Keir Starmer welcomes.

You can smell the net zero scam. It was never about ‘saving the planet’ We get higher bills, petrol car bans, carbon taxes and heat pumps… Whilst AI datacentres are preparing to burn gas on site because the grid can’t cope with demand. fossil fuels are unacceptable for us… but perfectly fine for Big Tech server farms powering our digital prison 🔥

A whistleblower has revealed this month that civil servants across multiple Whitehall departments have been gaming the flexitime system to award themselves up to fifty extra days of paid holiday a year That's about 2.5 months of full-time work lifted off the public payroll without record, on top of the CS-norm 26 days of annual leave, the eight public holidays, the contractual sick days, and of course the parental allowances that are already part of the standard package. The methods and techniques by which this fraud has been accomplished are worth dwelling on, because the detail tells you something about the institution. The first technique is the laptop-open-on-the-kitchen-table move. Here, the civil servant clocks off for all intents and purposes at 5pm but leaves a work laptop on, accumulating "active hours" from a home Wi-Fi connection, registering the evening as labour without performing any of it. The second trick is the commuting-time-as-paid-hours wheeze, in which the round trip from Surbiton to Whitehall - coffee-and-podcast - is logged as part of the working day. The third con, which the whistleblower reported as the most brazen of them all, is the straightforward falsification of office attendance against the three-days-a-week-on-site rule that this government, having promised the public a return of civil servants to civil-service buildings, has manifestly failed to enforce. The falsifications, in some cases, have been running for years. Sit, for a moment, with the kind of person who does this and the kind of institution that permits it. The person doing it is, in the main, a desk-bound senior official on between £55,000-130,000 a year, with access to a clocking system that runs on trust, who has decided, with the active connivance of his line manager and the silent assent of his department, that the appropriate response to that public trust is to defraud it. And it's not even ambitious or spectacular. At least with a major fraud, you have a level of vision and nerve you have to admire even as you despise the motivating corruption. No, here, it's done through a series of small, deniable engineered manoeuvres that together transfer large sums of public money into undeserving pockets. No honour among thieves, but some thieves are even less honourable than others. The institution that permits it is the British Civil Service, an organisation whose senior cadre has spent the last decade in a state of escalating public-facing self-pity about its working conditions while the country it is paid to run has visibly fallen apart underneath it. These are the same people who inherited the mandate of Brexit and, because the idea ran against the Metropolitan class bromides by which they orient their lives, hashed it up on purpose to punish the electorate whom they are duty-bound to serve. And it's the same civil service that could not, in the end, manage a single COVID procurement contract without losing about £30 billion out of the back of the warehouse. In light of this general disposition, a flexitime fraud is its small, daily, individual expression. And the cost is not abstract. The Civil Service pay bill runs to roughly £15 billion a year. Headcount has grown by approximately a hundred and fifty thousand since 2016, with the deepest expansion in the policy and "leadership non-teacher" desk grades, the exact cohort the whistleblower says is gaming hardest. Every 50-day phantom holiday, on a senior salary, is around £20k of public money paid for nothing. The country has been told for years, under successive governments, that there is no fiscal room for the things the country actually wants, like policing, prosecutions, courts that sit, borders, doctors, dentists, because the public finances are too tight. Bollocks are they. You've got a whole parallel economy of piss-artist leave-taking running in Whitehall, and there'll be plenty more cash coming in to keep its subsidy even given this whistleblower's report. I don't for a second believe that no one senior saw it or knew about it, just as I don't believe that the rampant inequities in our police departments go unnoticed by whole legions of bystanders. But the bystanders are not arsed. That's why I say "Hooray for the whistleblower." Their life is going to be hell. They will be hugely unpopular. They will be described as bitter, disloyal, mentally ill, motivated by personal grievance, and unrepresentative of the dedicated public servants who go above and beyond. That is what these institutions always say when one of their own breaks ranks. It is what they said to Maggie Oliver about Rotherham, to Alan Bates about Horizon, to the survivors of the Letby ward, the Cumberlege report, and the Sussex maternity unit. The smothering of internal dissent is now part of what the British civil service does for a living. The actual public service is something it has subcontracted to itself, badly, in stolen office hours, from the kitchen table. I was the Civil Service comprehensively remade in this country, the only way such things are ever made, which is by changing the people and all the incentives under which they operate. These people have been on the public payroll for fifteen years and have produced nothing for which the public can be grateful. It's time to find out where the hours went, and dispense with those who are wasting them, along with our money.

@Gaynotqueer1 @IKEA this is just nonsense. Stop employing people with pink and blue hair to run your PR dept

No IKEA I refuse.

I don’t have 29 friends that would come over if I called and said I had a girl to rape. I don’t have even one single friend who would do that. Yet there are entire races of people that will do that. That should put to rest the idea of racial equality.

6 years is nowhere near enough. They should at the minimum be deported on release

@sappholives83 It’s a start 🤞

FVCK YEAH!!!

@spectator @boswelltoday If they are males, then the correct pronouns, if required, are he/him. However they ‘identify’.

Mind your language if you want to speak in the Scottish Parliament. Newly elected presiding officer Kenny Gibson has told an interviewer that MSPs must refer to other members using their preferred gender pronouns. Scotland's devolved elections, held on 7 May alongside England's local elections, returned two MSPs who express a gender identity at odds with their male sex. Iris Duane considers himself a woman and says his pronouns are she/her. Q Manivannan identifies as 'non-binary' and says his pronouns are they/them. In an interview with the Times, Gibson said:. 'You have to respect what that person wants to be called. And if someone doesn’t do that, then you have to call that out in the chamber and you have to take the appropriate action. If there’s a clear issue of it looks like it’s being deliberate, then you have to act on that because you can’t have someone, a member of the parliament, feeling undervalued or disrespected. So whatever your personal views are of what they call themselves, it is what they want to call themselves, I think, which is significant.' ✍️ Stephen Daisley Article | spectator.com/article/scotla…

I have no problem with Islam. I’m just against beheading, stoning, marrying little girls, sexual slavery, taqiyya, slave trading, rape, forced conversions, jihad, burqa, attacking other religions, child abuse, women abuse, animal abuse, multiple wives, murder, Sharia, terrorism, brainwashing, intolerance, greed, anti-science, torture, illiteracy, gluttony, genital mutilation, inbreeding. Does that make me Islamophobic?

Outrageous!