Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc

12.1K posts

Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc banner
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc

Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc

@SynBio1

Synthetic Biologist - Foundry Theorist - stay humble biodesigners

Cambridge, MA Katılım Haziran 2014
404 Takip Edilen15.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc@SynBio1·
Stop glamorizing the hustle and start glamorizing the mussel
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc tweet media
English
103
4K
40.4K
0
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc retweetledi
3 ferrets in a lab coat
3 ferrets in a lab coat@moleculesrcool·
fertility achieved internally
English
0
2
10
273
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc
This makes me realize that I use this app much differently than most people I think I'm a lot happier than the typical X user too so I'll share my trick If an account posts or reposts articles that are not worth reading the whole thing, I simply don't follow them at all
Nikita Bier@nikitabier

We’re rolling out summaries for Articles now. Just tap the Summarize button if you want to know if it’s worth your time to read it (or if your attention span is 12 seconds).

English
0
0
8
333
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc retweetledi
Michael Baym
Michael Baym@baym·
Modern bio can only dream of tech as deep as citrus
Michael Baym tweet media
English
25
453
4.2K
66.7K
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc
The coming wave of AI lab assistants will allow biologists to "talk" their cell culture experiments but unfortunately you're going to hate it
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc tweet media
English
0
0
10
338
infrecursion
infrecursion@infrecursion1·
@SynBio1 Yes, but not because of what you think is the cause. It will be because humans like you become completely irrelevant.
English
1
0
1
64
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc
@heuristics I love it when math makes useful predictions that matter to people, even if those predictions don’t have “actual explanations” behind them The problem I’m trying to articulate is that AI can generate infinite predictions that will never be noticed or matter in any way
English
0
0
0
25
Chris Green
Chris Green@heuristics·
@SynBio1 it's a weird thing, natural science has more and more abandoned having actual explanations and are gravitating towards simply having math that makes predictions. Without any reasons for why it is like so.
English
1
0
1
13
Sandbar
Sandbar@Sandbar101·
@SynBio1 If your goal in life is to have people care about you, you will die very alone
English
1
0
0
23
Chris Green
Chris Green@heuristics·
@SynBio1 If one is found that has equal explanatory power but is metaphysically simpler, it’s a good thing, no?
English
1
0
1
122
Sandbar
Sandbar@Sandbar101·
@SynBio1 Problem? Thats literally the point. That’s the goal.
English
1
0
0
85
Mukesh Prasad
Mukesh Prasad@MPrasad65824·
@SynBio1 "This is the core problem of the next 5 years in the AI scientist era: infinite hypotheses about which nobody cares" That sounds like a great hypothesis! Did you find out if anybody cares?
English
1
0
6
538
Joe McAuliffe
Joe McAuliffe@JoeMcAuliffe17·
@ProfTomEllis @SynBio1 If you can’t get patent protection then your entire value proposition is at risk. Of course a drugs has to be safe and effective as well, but the reality is that drug development requires millions of investor dollars.
English
1
0
1
49
Tom Ellis
Tom Ellis@ProfTomEllis·
Okay here's a game - you're making nanobody therapeutics. AI can help you optimise them, but you need to prioritise order of feature importance. What is your order? Affinity Specificity Expressibility Clinical toxicity In vivo stability Purified stability Patentability Other?
English
12
3
46
4.6K