T²

I believe there is a generational buying opportunity in $TitanX right now. $3.25M worth of ETH is being paid out to stakers in 66 days. TitanX is currently at a $7.7M mcap with over $15M in it's buy and burn reserves. Multiple new builds upcoming plus existing ones. These set ups are incredibly rare.

@LibertySwapFi @zkxwallet Can you also add a cancel tx feature? Love ZKX btw

Never have your transactions stuck again on PulseChain. Just click on the stuck transaction and resubmit it on the ZKX Wallet Web App Mobile with higher gas! LFG @zkxwallet 🚀

This is the power of the SwitchX Automated Liquidity pools at work on the HEX/WPLS pair. $74k in 24-hour volume facilitated by only $26k total liquidity without anyone lifting a finger. This is the best volume to TVL ratio of any other like-for-like pool on the chain. No constant manual rebalancing, falling out of range, or guessing where price is going to be. All without support from the majority of aggregators. @SwitchDotWin @BrandonR2R

ITT: A guy that doesn't understand liquidity provision

@DevJuyoung @WhalesonPulse As a dev one might imagine that you would think more deeply about what is happening on-chain. Oh well.

🐳 3,413,037,123.58 $PLS ($28.78K) transferred from Unknown Wallet (0x2e62…e09b) → 0xb075…8d66 on PulseChain. Tx: 0x3e832dfa1239be687402bca83651e8ab80898745d25197f404a21182c5307c24

@DevJuyoung It's automated and the exact opposite happens on the way up. It is necessary to keep the liquidity position balanced around current price. I didn't see you praising SwitchX for fueling the pump on the way up when it was having to constantly buy more PLS?

@DevJuyoung Oh and it's entirely automated in the WPLS/USDC vault (and all other ALM vaults).

@DevJuyoung It's called rebalancing and it's what happens when you provide concentrated liquidity and need to manage inventory. It does the exact opposite on the way up where it has to buy more PLS.

@Hex_Turbo Noob behaviour. Should’ve bought the dip harder.

I'm not celebrating the PulseChain pump until PLSX is above sac rate and HEX is at least 2c.

@BrandonR2R It would be nice to see a eHEX/HEX ALM vault with some emissions. I feel like it's perfectly suited for the ALM feature. $SPARTA would be cool too once volume comes back

Important ‼️ A gauged pool on SwitchX.fi unlocks SWITCH emissions, helping communities build deeper liquidity and stronger markets. As we grow, we’ll be opening a limited number of gauged pool slots to high quality PulseChain projects. This benefits everyone: • Switch users get more liquidity and better markets. • Projects gain sustainable incentives to grow. • PulseChain becomes stronger with every quality community onboarded. Tag a token or founder you’d like to see on SwitchX.👇

I think $PLS is about to play some serious catch up to $ETH. NFA DYOR

TVL breaking all time high as we speak. Hands down, SwitchX.fi the best concentrated liquidity protocol on Pulse (that very few know about). Working in perfect synergy with the switch.win aggregator.

@BrandonR2R My favorite protocol on Pulsechain since launch - bar none.

The wealth effect from Pulsechain participating in the upcoming bull market will benefit TitanX more than the buy and burn will. The community crossover is huge and TitanX is such a small asset now - it only takes a small rotation for it to rocket.

It’s a fascinating experiment they’re running. It is clear that most dexes have perpetual emissions due to liquidity not being sticky, so it’ll be interesting to see what happens when emissions stop. The burn lock option is a significant part of retaining liquidity post-emissions IMO. They’re creating a community of people that are incentivised to grow TVL and volume on the DEX long after the emissions conclude. This paired with the automated liquidity management gives SwitchX a well defined USP.

Yeah so I thought the DAO controls which pools get farms though, so even if a non farm pool started catching real volume like the Piteas example @T2Defi gave, wouldn't the DAO be incentivized to activate a farm for it? At which point LPs drop back to 25%. Feels like a chicken and egg situation, at least until the end of the bootstrapping. But where I was missing the point was that emissions are temporary to bootstrap, and once that concludes it's a DEX protocol with customizations... Question: so post emissions, does the community fee on gauged pools reset back to 5% and LPs get 95%? Or does the 75/25 split stay active for governance/voter reward purposes even after new switch stops being minted? And do you have a repo

This Message is from @BrandonR2R : It has come to my attention over the past 24 hours that our respectful social media standards from the switch.win account have slipped. We have gone through years and years of hatred, pain, and mutual destruction online. I directly oppose the outrage marketing of the past, from any party involved. We need to be building each other up rather than tearing each other down if we have a shot at making this thing successful. The broader crypto community at large also needs to adopt a more professional image online. This account will continue to post screenshots of price quotes vs different competitors, and will engage in more healthy debate and banter. However, this will be done through a lense of respect and healthy competitiveness. I take full responsibility for this. My apologies. Thank you for the community bringing this to my attention. -BD

@CantillonFX @SwitchDotWin @BrandonR2R @DevJuyoung Yeah totally understand. Just saw an opportunity to highlight a lesser known aspect of SwitchX. Appreciate you keeping builders honest 👍

Btw @T2Defi to be clear my original comment wasn't about or shitting on switchX. It was pushing back on the "give RH your money via the anon wallet" narrative on PulseX, comparing PulseX to other DEXes competing on the same fee. The Switch post I replied to was pitching the aggregator as a better deal not switchX

Yeah this is only applicable to non-farm pairs which haven't seen much adoption yet. I think this is primarily because Piteas hasn't integrated SwitchX pairs yet so they miss out on order flow. The farms have definitely been a focus of the marketing but the V4 manual pools are undoubtedly best for retaining LP fees across the chain which is widely underappreciated.

Isn't the 95% just for non-farm pools though? Which all have basically zero TVL and volume, bc those are the pools with no ecosystem support, no emissions etc.. So "95% to LPs" seems to only apply to pools nobody actually uses bc there's little eco support. Then the pools that actually get used give LPs 25% From what I understand switch x is intrinsically a farming protocol.. technically a DEX underneath, but the market it's addressing is emissions farming, no? Granted I've never looked at the code, just skimmed the website and docs a few days ago, so I could be missing something

@WhalePulse Nothing obvious

ProveX frontend just updated after one month inactivity, what's new ?

@CantillonFX @SwitchDotWin @BrandonR2R @DevJuyoung SwitchX manual LPs give 95% of fees to the LPs. It is the cheapest place to LP on Pulsechain, excluding the Uniswap V3 forked contracts.

Nice post and gg @DevJuyoung. And on the note of healthy competition, let's actually open some up and break down the numbers on the anon wallet fee thing, because the framing matters. The fee isn't a hidden skim. It's deducted from the protocol fee itself. PulseX gives LPs the biggest cut of any DEX on the chain. The anon wallet's share is the smallest. The buy n burn cut is the biggest. That's true vs PancakeSwap too, which PulseX forked from. Yes the total swap fee is 0.29% vs PancakeSwap's 0.25%. But that extra 0.04% goes to LPs, and then some, not the team. And on top of that, LPs get a bigger proportional cut too (75.9% vs 68%). Put both together and PulseX LPs earn 0.22% of trade valuevs 0.17% on PancakeSwap. That's 5x more going to LPs on PulseX than the entire 0.01% the anon wallet even takes. That's not an accident. The code was changed to benefit the user. And that's before we even talk abuot what the devs on other PulseChain projects are taking per trade vs what PulseX takes. Different conversation, but yeah... Every angle that matters to users, PulseX wins

@piteasio You don't integrate some of the most liquid pools on the Pulsechain core coins, of course other aggregators are giving a better price.

we can give you an amazing route. we can probably show way more output than what’s actually real. wow, right? nope. building a route is way harder than people think. just an example.. one of the classic mistakes inexperienced devs and AI-built tools keep making is ignoring the cumulative impact principle when the same LP source is used more than once in a route. if an LP is touched once, that first action changes the entire LP state. then the second action must be calculated using the updated data, not the original one. most people won’t even understand why this matters, but this is literally the foundation. if you don’t care about it, you’ll think you’re getting a better output, then boom. the tx goes through because of your slippage tolerance, but you realize you didn’t receive the output you were shown. these are the words of someone who spent years rotting inside these equations and basically lives inside EVM architecture. we’re warning you. this is not as easy as telling AI “yo, handle this for me.” this is one of the most sensitive parts of web3, and mistakes here can create massive, irreversible losses. so if your only real weapon is Claude or something similar, go build something needed with less risk impact instead. this game is not for kids.

Piteas is the locomotive protocol of Pulsechain, and with the next upgrade, we’re coming for an even bigger slice of the trading pie. A lot of new stuff is on the way. Our internal LLM architecture was completed last week, and now we’ve started upgrading the main modules with the training data. Everything is being rebuilt from scratch, end to end. And yeah, it’s looking insanely clean. Also, let’s talk about something. We don’t find it weird that new guys in the ecosystem keep positioning themselves against Piteas and trying to build rival aggregators. We’re the most visible one here, so of course they want to copy us. But these comparisons are not things you prove with a few screenshots. We don’t have time to expose all of them one by one, but let this be clear: outputs shown without being calculated correctly, whether intentional or not, can get you labeled as a fraud. You should stop doing that. Some people will remember a very similar case from the past :) More than 10 dex aggregators popped up in the last year. Almost all of them were built with AI tools, meaning it wasn’t really personal skill, and the result was exactly what you’d expect: failure. Go build products Pulsechain actually needs. There are 10 different grocery stores on the same street, but not a single bar. That’s the example. Build something that doesn’t exist. Build something people actually need. Every protocol that stood beside us instead of standing against us grew, and will keep growing. But the ones that saw us as the enemy never made it anywhere. Sorry, facts! And lastly, please stop asking Claude, “hey, can you build me an aggregator like Piteas?”. Improve yourself first. Running a protocol is not something everyone can do, and AI still can’t do it for you.

Another episode of Whales Hate Money... Same PLSX amount. Same direction. Switch.win: 87,131.41 USDC PulseChain’s leading aggregator: 86,801.43 USDC ~330 more USDC kept by routing through Switch. Better routing. More of what you’re switching to.