TFWy

@Excel_Ant @TNTJohn1717 LITERAL Translation of John 3:26 is “One DISOBEYING the Son”. Older Translations uses “believeth not the Son”, but LITERAL Translation is “DISOBEYING the Son”

@TF_WOG @TNTJohn1717 John 3:36 KJV — He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

🚨‼️This chart shows the difference between Mother Teresa’s works of mercy and the gospel of grace in the King James Bible. Her compassion for the poor and dying was real, but the Bible test is not charity, reputation, suffering, or Rome’s saint-making system. Salvation is not found in love-infused works, the Mass, Mary, sacraments, or interfaith kindness. The true gospel is Jesus Christ alone: one Mediator, one finished sacrifice, one Saviour, and salvation by grace through faith.

Please read your Gospel: Our WORKS are NECESSARY for Salvation, NOT on their own merits, but because Jesus DEMANDED it (Luke 9:23) and Scriptures directly stated we MUST OBEY Jesus for SALVATION— (John 3:36). According to John 3:36, SALVATION requires 1.) “BELIEVE in the Son, Jesus” and 2.) “OBEY the Son, Jesus ➡️ “OBEY Jesus” = OBEY His DEMANDS for us to “Deny ourselves (deny “our selfish will”) and choose His Will to “TAKE UP our CROSS and Follow Him” to Calvary and Enter Heaven (Luke 9:23). We are not “working for our salvation”, but simply OBEYING Jesus’s DEMANDS. John 3:36 is SO important to clarify what is needed for SALVATION:

WORKS are necessary for SALVATION, not on their own merits, but because we MUST OBEY Jesus’s DEMANDS. (Luke 9:23) He DEMANDS that we PARTICIPATE in His Sufferings & Sacrifice by “Deny ourselves (DENY “our selfish will” to choose God’s Will)” and “TAKE UP OUR CROSS to FOLLOW Him” (Follow Him to Calvary with our CROSS to PARTICIPATE in His Sacrifice. At Catholic Mass—this is EXACTLY what we do—as the PARTICIPANTS are transported back in Time & Space to participate with Jesus on Calvary. Jesus is NOT “re-sacrificed”, but instead ALL participants are brought back to that Exact Time & Place during a Catholic Mass.)

If you believe in a gospel that says works are necessary for justification, you are not a Christian.

“Sola Fide-Faith Alone” is FALSE Doctrine that leads many people to hell—because it CONTRADICTS Jesus’s Teachings & Scripture. FAITH (“Believe in Jesus”) ALSO means WORKS (“Obey Jesus”). Protestants loves John 3:16, but IGNORE John 3:36: 1.) John 3:36 clearly states that SALVATION requires “BELIEF in Jesus” and “OBEYING Jesus”. 2.) “OBEYING Jesus” means ➡️to OBEY His commands to “DENY ourselves and TAKE up our CROSS to follow Him” because He wants us to PARTICIPATE in His Sufferings & Sacrifices ➡️to OBEY His Instructions on His Sacraments (ie Eucharist) as the Physical manifestations of our Spiritual Life in Christ.

@biblecia There is NO conflict for Catholics between John 6 and Matthew 18:8-9…

I’ve heard all this before, dear sir. There is likely nothing new you’re gonna tell me about Eucharistic views, sir. And honestly, this should change your mind. Before God I can tell you I mean this, I’d respect your argument about a literal interpretation of eating and drinking here in John if you were maimed and also “obeyed” Jesus’ words in Matthew such as in Matthew 18:8-9. He said nothing of symbol or metaphor there, sir. Nothing. No one ever said it was symbolic. So what, none of his disciples ever obeyed him? Are you having someone else read this and type for you because you are without hands, feet and eyes? If so, please let me know. Really. I’d really like to hear you out more. How *infallibly do you know that Jesus is speaking literally in one place and figuratively in another? Wake up. Otherwise this other inconsistency (like the bloody and un-bloody stuff) is only more evidence of your hypocrisy sir and yet another sign of your failed argumentation. You only obey Jesus when it suits you it seems, or when it costs you nothing. Or maybe your flesh really just has never caused you to sin. Wait, that’s not a possibility. Like Mary (the real one) and me, you too have the same sin problem. Romans 3:23 and all. You have no way to argue out of this at all. Anyway, I’m really not trying to insult you, but are you an infallible interpreter of Scripture, sir? Am I talking to one in the current cohort of the magisterium? If so, I’d like to set up a Zoom call please. It’s free. We got some stuff to chat about! How do you know you’re not making a mistake here? Are you even close to infallible? You should literally just be quoting me infallible doctrinal statements on this passage and nothing else, sir. Or perhaps you have been given the gift of infallibly interpreting the infallible interpreters of the passage? And how might I know that you’ve been given this gift? Did they tell you? Send a pic. Without it, and then of course one for me from them too to tell me I can infallibly interpret you infallibly interpreting them, how would I ever know I could infallibly interpret you in your gift of infallibly interpreting the only infallible interpreters? Just be careful maybe. You shouldn’t be interpreting the Bible as a Catholic; that’s how Protestantism starts. (Like in the first century way before any papal ideas sprang up.) I don’t know anybody could ever break through the spiritual callous that is Catholicism, but I know the God who saves. I hope you can hear. Grace to you. I’m not trying to insult you, but there’s no way for you to argue around this. These are from me on John 6: biblecia.com/media/yrynp3h/… biblecia.com/media/4nvy6hx/…

(Part 2 of 2) Do I have the AUTHORITY to infallibility interpret the Bible? NO. BUT…Jesus gave that Authority “To Bind & To Loose” with the Keys to Heaven—to Peter, the First Pope of the Catholic Church. This includes the Authority to “put together the Books of the Bible” and to “Interpret them”—with the Guidance of the Holy Spirit. Jesus created His Catholic Church with the Keys to Heaven with the Authority to Bind & to Loose (Mt 16:18-19). Jesus said “the gate of hell will not prevail against it (His Church)”. In fact Jesus anticipated that “hell” WILL try (ie PROTESTANTISM)… BUT Jesus will ALWAYS guide His Church through the Holy Spirit. Martin Luther ADMITTED he was INFLUENCED by SATAN to oppose the Catholic Private Mass…and even said SATAN’s (“father of lies—John 8:44) points were “truthful”.

I’ve heard all this before, dear sir. There is likely nothing new you’re gonna tell me about Eucharistic views, sir. And honestly, this should change your mind. Before God I can tell you I mean this, I’d respect your argument about a literal interpretation of eating and drinking here in John if you were maimed and also “obeyed” Jesus’ words in Matthew such as in Matthew 18:8-9. He said nothing of symbol or metaphor there, sir. Nothing. No one ever said it was symbolic. So what, none of his disciples ever obeyed him? Are you having someone else read this and type for you because you are without hands, feet and eyes? If so, please let me know. Really. I’d really like to hear you out more. How *infallibly do you know that Jesus is speaking literally in one place and figuratively in another? Wake up. Otherwise this other inconsistency (like the bloody and un-bloody stuff) is only more evidence of your hypocrisy sir and yet another sign of your failed argumentation. You only obey Jesus when it suits you it seems, or when it costs you nothing. Or maybe your flesh really just has never caused you to sin. Wait, that’s not a possibility. Like Mary (the real one) and me, you too have the same sin problem. Romans 3:23 and all. You have no way to argue out of this at all. Anyway, I’m really not trying to insult you, but are you an infallible interpreter of Scripture, sir? Am I talking to one in the current cohort of the magisterium? If so, I’d like to set up a Zoom call please. It’s free. We got some stuff to chat about! How do you know you’re not making a mistake here? Are you even close to infallible? You should literally just be quoting me infallible doctrinal statements on this passage and nothing else, sir. Or perhaps you have been given the gift of infallibly interpreting the infallible interpreters of the passage? And how might I know that you’ve been given this gift? Did they tell you? Send a pic. Without it, and then of course one for me from them too to tell me I can infallibly interpret you infallibly interpreting them, how would I ever know I could infallibly interpret you in your gift of infallibly interpreting the only infallible interpreters? Just be careful maybe. You shouldn’t be interpreting the Bible as a Catholic; that’s how Protestantism starts. (Like in the first century way before any papal ideas sprang up.) I don’t know anybody could ever break through the spiritual callous that is Catholicism, but I know the God who saves. I hope you can hear. Grace to you. I’m not trying to insult you, but there’s no way for you to argue around this. These are from me on John 6: biblecia.com/media/yrynp3h/… biblecia.com/media/4nvy6hx/…

Catholics: “The sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are one single sacrifice… ‘And since in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the Mass, the same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is contained and offered in an unbloody manner… this sacrifice is truly propitiatory.’” CCC 1367. Also Catholics:

Let’s discuss Matthew 18:8-9. Jesus does indeed meant that LITERALLY! If I KNOW ahead of time that I will go to hell because of my EYES or HANDS—I would rather be blind or lame. Jesus even BLINDED PAUL to stop him from for persecuting Christians (Acts 9:1-19). Paul thanked God for what happened to him. He would rather be blinded than go to hell as a murderer of Christians. I have a friend who admitted he was a “terrible person who was far from God” before he had a STROKE that incapacitated him. Now he is wheelchair bound, but developed a deep love for God after his stroke and strengthened his relationship with his loving wife. My friend is a LITERAL example of Matthew 18:8-9.

@joshwhitlatch @VanillaDeedle @ZoomZam10 There are only 126 Authenticated Eucharistic Miracle in History. So, many (you can even say most) “possible” cases of Eucharistic Miracles have “natural explanations”. “Mold & Bacteria” were ALWAYS RULED OUT first and foremost. The samples are then examined by medical experts:

@TF_WOG @VanillaDeedle @ZoomZam10 Yes, many reported Eucharistic miracles have been completely debunked and explained away as bacterial or mold contamination. In fact, the vast majority of modern claims are found to be natural biological reactions

@biblecia When the Jews “PROTESTED”, Jesus explained what He meant:

@TF_WOG Answer, sir, it is you who are like the unbelieving Jews in the first century who were offended in the Gospel and stumbled over it.

You have no obligation to believe in the Miracles (They’re there to help your belief). BUT… If you intentionally use that term to describe the Eucharist—it’s BLASPHEMY. Protestants loves John 3:16, but IGNORE John 3:36: 1.) John 3:36 clearly states that SALVATION requires “BELIEF in Jesus” and “OBEYING Jesus”. 2.) “OBEYING Jesus” means ➡️to OBEY His commands to “DENY ourselves and TAKE up our CROSS to follow Him” because He wants us to PARTICIPATE in His Sufferings & Sacrifices, ➡️to OBEY His Instructions on His Sacraments (ie Eucharist) as the Physical manifestations of our Spiritual Life in Christ.

@TF_WOG @VanillaDeedle @ZoomZam10 Satanic

@VanillaDeedle @ZoomZam10 @joshwhitlatch Jesus’s Body, Blood, Soul, and FULL Divinity are in the Consecrated Host and Wine.

@ZoomZam10 @joshwhitlatch Catholics don't even receive the blood.

Then LISTEN to PAUL in SCRIPTURE: Paul declared that the Eucharist IS Jesus’ Body & Blood…those who received Jesus’ Body & Blood unworthily is GUILTY for Judgement. (1 Cor 11:27) “Whoever, therefore, EATS the bread or DRINKS the cup of the Lord in an UNWORTHY manner will be GUILTY concerning the BODY & BLOOD of the LORD.

The LITERAL translation is John 6:54 is not simply “eat or feed” but to “GNAW or CHEW”. You are just LIKE the JEWS who “PROTESTED” (“This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?”) and “TURNED THEIR BACK” when Jesus said, “Whoever feeds on MY FLESH and drinks MY BLOOD has eternal life (SALVATION), and I will raise him up on the last day.” (John 6:54).

You don’t have eternal life in rejecting the Gospel of the righteousness of Jesus Christ for the self-righteousness of modern Romanism. This is made evident partly because you believe you actually eat Jesus and turn him to refuse which is a most foul blasphemy. He commanded no one to do such a crime against all that is lovely and true. God will judge you in all your sins unless you believe in Jesus. Repent, come, and welcome to Jesus Christ. subsplash.com/u/bibleciacom/…

Our WORKS are NECESSARY for Salvation, NOT on their own merits, but because Jesus DEMANDED it (Luke 9:23) and Scriptures directly stated we MUST OBEY Jesus for SALVATION (John 3:36). According to John 3:36, SALVATION requires 1.) “BELIEVE in the Son, Jesus” and 2.) “OBEY the Son, Jesus ➡️ “OBEY Jesus” = OBEY His DEMANDS for us to “Deny ourselves (deny “our selfish will”) and choose His Will to “TAKE UP our CROSS and Follow Him” to Calvary and Enter Heaven (Luke 9:23). We are not “working for our salvation”, but simply OBEYING Jesus’s DEMANDS. John 3:36 is SO important to clarify what is needed for SALVATION:

I know I’m going to get blasted for this, but this is what I believe with every fiber of my being! I’m Praying for everyone on the left side of this chart. Though some can be saved if they oppose the church’s official theology, and trust Christ blood alone through faith.

Then WHY do you IGNORE Scriptures—Both Jesus and Paul: Paul taught the Eucharist IS Jesus’ Body & Blood…those who received Jesus’ Body & Blood unworthily is GUILTY for Judgement. (1 Cor 11:27) “Whoever, therefore, EATS the bread or DRINKS the cup of the Lord in an UNWORTHY manner will be GUILTY concerning the BODY & BLOOD of the LORD.

The Bible defeats Catholicism yet again: "All Scripture is breathed out by God and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." —2 Timothy 3:16-17

Why is the Eucharist NECESSARY? Remember that Jesus told us to do “All the Good Works” in the “Sermon on the Mount” (Matthew 5)…and in the end He said that we MUST do so PERFECTLY (Matthew 5:48). Why MUST our WORKS be PERFECT? Because nothing IMPERFECT is acceptable before God the Father (“because your Heavenly Father is PERFECT”). That is why when we UNITE SPIRITUALLY WITH JESUS (“Abide in Me and I in him”), Jesus makes our works become HIS WORKS, and thus He PERFECT them. (John 17:23."I in them, and You in Me; that they may be MADE PERFECT in one.) Jesus wants us to UNITE with Him so He can DO our WORKS WITH US (not “for us”). Jesus does not “only” want to unite with us SPIRITUALLY but also PHYSICALLY (Sacramentally) through the Eucharist—(John 6:56) "Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood REMAINS IN ME, and I IN HIM.")—because after all, He would be doing our PHYSICAL Earthly WORKS WITH US, and the Eucharist is the PHYSICAL manifestation of His UNION with us. Jesus WANTS our “IMPERFECT WORKS” so He can make them HIS own WORKS—which are ALWAYS PERFECT before God the Father.

With all respect, does anyone on the transubstance side here not ever consider how they argue their literal interpretation view with eyes, hands and feet? Sans a scintilla of a metaphorical or spiritual speech disclaimer the Son says: “If your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it from you...If your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be cast into the fiery hell." Matt. 18:8-9 (NASB95). What he's saying is that it would be better for me- if it could remove my sin- to cut off and pluck out than to remain in the sin they bring. We can sin w/out all digits, however, so we should know he's not talking literally. I doubt most "literalists" would say their flesh never brought sin into their lives, so it's clear they're simply "not obeying" Jesus' words. The point: if we don’t take Jesus’ words spiritually, metaphorically or symbolically, we *cannot take them literally! This is the same symbolic speech like "eat" and "drink" is in the context of John 6:35's "come" and "believe." If they were consistent we Protestants would be arguing against transubstance only with the blind and maimed. They're not. I can work up a respect for real presence as a memorialist. Indeed, the Table of the Lord is precious and to be conducted in reverence and worship as another work of righteousness. This is exegetically reasonable and is often therefore a more respectable historical position. I have zero appreciation for transubstantiation, however, especially with the dogmatic heresies that now accompany it in the past ~1K years. I'd pity them, but I'd respect the view more from consistent literalist men without their eyes, hands and feet who take everything as “literally” as they do what in their view necessitates the role of their special pope-down-priesthood. Two of many teachings on John 6 from me I’d like to share: 1) biblecia.com/media/4nvy6hx/…. 2) biblecia.com/media/yrynp3h/…. See also: founders.org/library/chapte…. Grace to all.

Romans Catholics and Orthodox teach a false gospel on the Eucharist. Today at 1PM Pacific Time open mic challenge here on X. Please share with others thank you. To join in and talk the link is x.com/i/spaces/1nxel… @james_bert_mill @BibleInContext1 @BibleVerses @biblecia @FightofFaith @Exposit_TheWord @farmingandJesus @LizzieMarbach @OnceLost @MikeWingerii @5SolasMissy @taco_talks LIKE TO WATCH ON YOUTUBE LINK youtube.com/live/tAAaFXOTV…

@biblecia @KellyPowersBPA @james_bert_mill @BibleInContext1 @BibleVerses (Part 2 of 2) Yes, it’s IMPOSSIBLE to fake. The Host Bread GRADUALLY intertwine with the Heart Tissue FLESH—you can SEE the Gradual Transition. Look up the information—it’s not hard to find:

It’s not impossible to fake as I’m sure many of these are fake. Perhaps all. Or it’s the devil at work, but there is not a chance that that’s God at work. The Catholic Eucharist is a blasphemy even without actual literal blood claims. But again, if it’s bloody, you’re clearly contradicting Catholic doctrine. The idea that you would not or could not see this does not surprise me. Respectfully.

You are CONTRADICTING Scriptures—Both Jesus AND Paul: Paul taught the Eucharist IS Jesus’ Body & Blood…those who received Jesus’ Body & Blood unworthily is GUILTY for Judgement. (1 Cor 11:27) “Whoever, therefore, EATS the bread or DRINKS the cup of the Lord in an UNWORTHY manner will be GUILTY concerning the BODY & BLOOD of the LORD.