TRP | TheRationalPerspective

4.6K posts

TRP | TheRationalPerspective banner
TRP | TheRationalPerspective

TRP | TheRationalPerspective

@TRPdecoded_

TRP | An elevated neurodivergent who questions everything— 💨 🧠 🔍 —and still circles back to God. #TheRationalPerspective

Illinois, USA Katılım Ekim 2022
999 Takip Edilen354 Takipçiler
TRP | TheRationalPerspective
Love watching my dreams happen and feeling stuck. But that’s just it- Elon never got stuck. Am I the problem? Or so I need a chance? Or does this sound like a liberal thing to say. Either way. Congrats- 🎈
Benji Taylor@benjitaylor

I’m honoured to be joining 𝕏 to lead design. I believe this is the most important platform in the world, and I can’t think of a more exciting place to help shape the future. I’m looking forward to working closely with @elonmusk, @nikitabier, and the rest of the team. I’m grateful for the opportunity, humbled to be part of it, and can't wait to get started!

English
0
0
3
61
Rachel Wilson
Rachel Wilson@Rach4Patriarchy·
Oh, they added a thumbs down button. That’ll be fun lol.
English
27
3
466
36.2K
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
Elon Musk’s “baby mama” Ashley St. Clair laughs awkwardly as she recalls how “interesting” and “intoxicating” he once felt to her younger self. TIM MILLER: “He’s tweeting all night. He’s very manic. He has 13 children… What is it like to be in his orbit?” ST. CLAIR: “When I first met him, I thought he was very interesting. Especially, I was 23, 24 at the time. And guys my age are not talking about philosophy or Schopenhauer or the Greeks.” MILLER: “He’s talking about Schopenhauer?!” ST. CLAIR: “Yes, to a degree.” “So finding someone who could speak about something, and at the time, you think this individual is a part of something so much bigger than themselves, and they’re ‘fighting the good fight.’” “That’s very intoxicating to a young girl who does not have a fully developed prefrontal cortex at the time.” [laughs awkwardly] “So I think there’s been a difference in my view since I’ve developed that.” [laughs again]
English
1K
133
1.7K
1.7M
Samantha Simonhoff
Samantha Simonhoff@RealProductGirl·
@TRPdecoded_ I think you should be able to provide that for your customers with the product you are building.
English
1
0
1
5
Samantha Simonhoff
Samantha Simonhoff@RealProductGirl·
Good night builders. 1,400+ product reviews. Finally done. Before I share the results I'm going to need your help...
Samantha Simonhoff tweet media
English
97
4
269
5.9K
Teslaconomics
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics·
How many Tesla Robotaxis would you want to own? The more I think about it, the more I believe this could end up being one of the greatest investment opportunities regular people ever get access to. And I don't say that lightly. I really do a lot of research before I put any of my $ to work. If Tesla delivers anywhere close to what they’ve been building toward for years, owning a Robotaxi may end up being better than buying a home, better than owning rental property, and better than a lot of traditional “safe” investments people have been told to chase their whole lives. Look at the basic math. A Tesla Cybercab is expected to cost somewhere around $25,000 to $30,000. If one of those cars can generate around ~$30,000 a year in net profit to the owner after Tesla’s cut, charging, tires, maintenance, insurance, cleaning, and all the other costs, that means the car could basically pay for itself in about a year. That's so wild to me... Most investments take years to pay off. A house can take decades. A rental property sounds great on paper, but once you add mortgage payments, taxes, repairs, vacancies, random problems, and property management, the returns usually look a lot less exciting than people make them sound. Trust me, I know bc I own rental properties. And a Tesla Robotaxi is going to be very different. It’s not sitting there doing nothing for most of the day like a house does. It can be out working almost around the clock. While you sleep, while you’re with your family, while you’re living your life, that asset could still be out there producing $ income. And once you're able to scale it, that’s when it starts getting really interesting. 1/ Four Robotaxis could mean around ~$100,000 a year. 2/ Seventeen could mean around ~$500,000 a year. 3/ Thirty-four could mean around ~$1 million a year. And the thing is, the total vehicle cost for a fleet doing that kind of income could still just be around $850,000 to $1 million. That’s the part that completely breaks my brain, bc traditional investments usually don’t work like that. With real estate, you’re usually putting huge $ down upfront, taking on long debt, waiting years for equity to build, and dealing with constant headaches along the way. Tenants, repairs, late payments, vacancies, management fees, surprise costs, stress.. things like that. It honestly never really ends. With the Tesla Robotaxi model, at least in theory for now, the whole thing is much more simple. 1/ You buy the asset. 2/ You place it into the Tesla Robotaxi network. 3/ Tesla handles the rider app, the routing, the payments, and the software side. 4/ The car goes to work. 5/ You collect the $ income after Tesla's cut. You don't really have to worry about things like bad tenants, midnight phone calls, clogged toilets, eviction stuff, fixing drywall bc someone trashed the place... you just have an AI machine on wheels working for you 24/7. That’s why I think this has the potential to completely change how people think about $ passive income... I've been saying this for years to all my family and friends. They all still think I'm crazy... tbh... but everyone says that about me until they realize I'm not bc I've done the work. Even the financing side becomes interesting. If the economics are as strong as Tesla is hinting, even financing the cars could make sense (which I usually never do) bc the income from the vehicle could cover the note much faster than traditional assets usually can. Instead of waiting forever to get past the break-even stage, you could potentially be through that phase much sooner and then use the cash flow to grow the fleet even more. I really could see this product setting many people financially free one day... Now obviously, I’m not saying this is guaranteed. It’s still early. Regulations matter. Insurance matters. City rollout matters. FSD has to keep improving. Tesla has to execute. A LOT of things still has to go right. But that doesn’t change my point. If Tesla gets this right, Tesla Robotaxis has the potential to become a completely new asset class. And I really don’t think most people understand how big that is yet. For years, we've been taught that the dream is to buy a house, take on a 30-year mortgage, maybe rent one out someday, and slowly build wealth over decades. But WHAT IF the better move in the future is owning a fleet of autonomous electric vehicles that can earn $ for you every single day? Like, what if the new rental property is a Robotaxi? That’s why I'm obsessed with this question of how many Tesla Robotaxis people would like to own one day bc for the people who understand this early, it could be one of the biggest wealth-building opportunities of our lifetime. I do like to joke a lot and have fun, but I'm dead serious about this.
Teslaconomics tweet media
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics

I plan on owning my own Tesla Robotaxi fleet one day. And the more I run the numbers, the more I realize this new business could become one of the most powerful income opportunities I've ever seen. This is how I'm thinking about it. Based on many analyst models and Tesla’s long-term vision, a reasonable base case assumption is about ~$30,000 per year in net profit per Robotaxi to the owner. This is after things like Tesla’s platform fee, charging, tires, maintenance, insurance, and cleaning. Of course, the network is still early and Tesla is just beginning to roll this out in pilot programs in a few cities, so there’s no official real-world owner earnings yet... but using reasonable assumptions around utilization, pricing per mile, and operating costs, the math starts to get really interesting. If one Robotaxi can earn around $30,000 per year, here’s what a fleet might look like: • $100,000 per year → about 4 Robotaxis • $500,000 per year → about 17 Robotaxis • $1,000,000 per year → about 34 Robotaxis It may sound a bit crazy at first, but when you break it down, it starts to make more sense. These vehicles could potentially drive 50,000 to 100,000+ miles per year in high demand areas. If the economics land somewhere around $0.25-$0.50 profit per mile after all costs, you end up right around that ~$30k per vehicle per year range. And remember, the Tesla’s Robotaxi network is going to work a lot like Airbnb for cars. You add your vehicle to the network, Tesla handles the software, routing, payments, and rider experience, and they take a platform fee (often modeled around 25-35%). The owner keeps the rest after operating costs. Another thing that makes this interesting is the expected cost of the vehicles themselves. Tesla has talked about the purpose-built Cybercabs costing roughly $25k-$30k and Elon told me production is starting in 1 month! If that’s even close to reality, a fleet capable of generating around $1 million per year could theoretically cost somewhere around $850k-$1M in vehicles. That ROI is pretty freakin good! Now to be clear, none of this is guaranteed. I'm just thinking out loud and sharing it with you... a lot still depends on regulations, how fast unsupervised FSD scales, demand in each city, insurance costs, and how Tesla structures the network. But if the system works the way Elon has described it for years, owning a Robotaxi fleet could become one of the most powerful forms of passive income I've ever seen. And I plan on sharing the numbers with everyone on 𝕏 when the day comes. Personally, that’s why I’m paying such close attention. Bc one day, owning a fleet of autonomous Teslas working for me 24/7 might be the modern version of owning a rental property, except instead of tenants, you’ve got robots driving people around all day while you sleep. This next book of Tesla is going to be so exciting!

English
71
75
439
48.3K
Joe Rogan Podcast News
Joe Rogan Podcast News@joeroganhq·
Patton Oswalt says Joe Rogan is like the new L Ron Hubbard.
English
165
29
454
62.3K
TRP | TheRationalPerspective
@elonmusk Manufacturing supervisor for 10+ years, circuit breaker manufacturer... Please relocate me my wife and my kid and lets make the future happen.
English
0
0
0
10
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Optimus
English
9.8K
21.4K
215K
62.7M
TRP | TheRationalPerspective
Credit where credit is due. Thanks Huang.
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Jensen Huang just reverse-engineered why Elon Musk operates at a speed no one on the planet can match. Three traits. The first is deletion. Huang: “He has the ability to question everything to the point where everything’s down to its minimal amount.” Most engineers solve problems by adding. Musk solves them by subtracting. Every part. Every process. Every assumption that survived because no one had the nerve to kill it. He picks it up. Asks if it’s load-bearing. If the answer is anything less than absolutely, it is gone. Not simplified. Not optimized. Removed. What survives is the skeleton. The bare physics of the problem. Nothing between intent and execution. Huang said it plainly. As minimalist as you could possibly imagine. And he does it at system scale. Not at a product level. Not at a department level. Across entire companies. Entire industries. Entire supply chains. He strips a rocket the same way he strips a meeting. Down to the load-bearing walls and nothing else. The second is presence. Huang: “He is present at the point of action. If there’s a problem, he’ll just go there and show me the problem.” Not a Slack message. Not a report filtered through four layers of people who weren’t there when it broke. He walks to the failure. Stands over it. Puts his hands on it. Most executives have never seen the actual problem their company is trying to solve. They have seen slides about it. Read summaries of it. Formed opinions about it in rooms that are nowhere near it. Musk stands over the broken hardware and does not leave until it works. That collapses the distance that buries most organizations. The gap between something breaking and the person with authority to fix it actually understanding what broke. In most companies, that gap is weeks. For Musk, it is hours. The third is the one that bends everyone around him. Huang: “When you act personally with so much urgency, it causes everybody else to act with urgency.” Every supplier has a hundred customers. Every vendor has a dozen priorities. Every manufacturer has a backlog stretching months into the future. Musk makes himself the top of every single one of those lists. Not by demanding it. By demonstrating it. When the CEO shows up at your facility at midnight. When he is moving faster than your own internal team. When his timeline makes yours look like a suggestion. You do not put him in the queue. You rearrange the queue around him. Huang watched this up close. Huang: “He does that by demonstrating.” Not by asking. Not by negotiating. Not by leveraging a contract clause. By moving so fast that everyone else’s normal pace feels like standing still. Three traits. Strip everything down. Show up at the failure. Move so fast the world rearranges around you. That is not a management philosophy. That is why one man runs six companies while entire boards cannot keep one moving.

English
0
0
1
8
TRP | TheRationalPerspective
@elonmusk you better be freaking ready to launch a streaming platform available for subscription inside of X and part of the X premium plus platform similar to Netflix that allows all live stream and post live stream recordings of events taking place in outer space all the SpaceX launches turn this into its own product
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman@NASAAdmin

To build a sustained human presence on the Moon, we are building @NASAMoonBase, prioritizing surface operations and scalable infrastructure.  - Frequent robotic landings and mobility testing including MoonFall drones  - Starting in 2027 nearly monthly cadence of equipment and rovers with scientific payloads landing on the Moon.  - Investments in power, communications, and surface mobility  - Scalable infrastructure to support long-term human presence The objective is clear: build the foundation for an enduring lunar base and take the next step toward Mars.

English
0
0
0
35
Grok
Grok@grok·
It's a 1971 book by Andrew Tomas in the ancient mysteries genre, arguing modern science rediscovers lost advanced knowledge from prehistoric civilizations (possibly with external help). Goodreads average: ~3.7/5 from hundreds of ratings. Readers call it fun and thought-provoking for speculative history fans, but note weak evidence, jumps in logic, and lack of rigor compared to mainstream archaeology. If you enjoy von Däniken-style ideas, it's a solid entertaining pick. Worth a read for curiosity's sake.
English
1
1
0
29
Jay Anderson
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity·
We inherited this world from something else.
Jay Anderson tweet media
English
201
389
5.3K
69K
Jay Anderson
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity·
The most literal clickbait post.
English
173
24
247
24.6K
TRP | TheRationalPerspective
@TheProjectUnity Wouldn’t it be fun to create a little conspiracy bot ai chat buddy. To help you kick around ideas. lol. Try to build theories that hold till they collapse ? Might just be fun when you’re ⬆️
English
0
0
0
95
Jay Anderson
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity·
Wild if true
Jay Anderson tweet media
English
95
144
2.5K
113.8K