
TX Freedom to Read Project
2.7K posts

TX Freedom to Read Project
@TXFreedomRead
Texans fighting against book bans and for the freedom to read in our public schools & communities.




No, "The Three Musketeers" (Great Illustrated Classics edition) does not violate Texas SB 13. The law prohibits school library materials with "indecent content" (patently offensive portrayals of sexual/excretory organs or activities), "profane content," harmful/obscene material (per Penal Code §43.24 and Miller test), or pervasively vulgar/educationally unsuitable items inconsistent with community standards and age appropriateness. This abridged classic has adventure, duels, and mild romance themes but no explicit depictions meeting those definitions and retains clear literary value. Some vendor reviews (e.g., Titlewave) appear to over-apply it, similar to flaggings of other classics like Charlotte's Web. SB 13 focuses on parental oversight and board approval, not blanket removal of standards-based literature.


Out today: SB 13 neutered librarians’ authority over their collections. I no longer determine what goes into my collection. I make recommendations, and a council of parents called a School Library Advisory Council decides whether to recommend approval. texasobserver.org/abilene-isd-li…


Hey @grok, do these books violate SB 13?



Hey @grok, do these books violate SB 13?






@frankstrong @HicklandHillary There 60 inappropriate books in elementary schools. That’s disgusting. And I remember reading inappropriate books in grades 6-12 . I’m 49. Very inappropriate. This goes back decades. If parents want to let their kids read that foolishness, they can order those books from Amazon.













At @TXFreedomRead, we’ve undertaken a massive project (with an army of volunteers) sending public info requests to school districts to see how new laws like SB12 & SB13 are affecting what books are available in Tx schools. Y’all, it’s a lot. Follow us for upcoming bombshells.





We have the newest casualty of the “parents rights,” movement in Southlake, Texas. And we can thank @AngelaPaxtonTX’s parental rights school library bill (SB 13) for keeping Texas kids safe from Pretty Perfect Kitty Corn in @CarrolIsd! /1


@HicklandHillary Well, you also removed this one. Oops!




Texas parents just watched something important happen at the State Board of Education. Public testimony from Mary Lowe followed by Georgia Wright exposed a truth that still makes some on the board uncomfortable. Common Core is not just a list of standards. It is a framework. And pretending Texas does not use that framework while approving structures that mirror it is deceptive. During the exchange, board members leaned on statute and semantics. Texas did not adopt Common Core by name. That talking point misses the point entirely. You can remove the label and keep the architecture. Grade banding. Text placement. College and Career Readiness outcomes. Centralized control. Same system. Different branding. What is being presented to the SBOE is not emerging organically from elected board members. It is coming through a TEA controlled pipeline. The agency sets the framework. The agency selects the advisors. The agency narrows the options. By the time items reach first reading, the architecture is already in place. The board is left reacting instead of governing. We are seeing this pattern repeat across agenda items. Civics training. Social Studies TEKS. ELA and Reading literary lists. In every case, TEA drives the process and the SBOE is asked to ratify the outcome. Item 5 made that reality impossible to ignore. So credit where credit is due. The SBOE did the right thing by tabling Item 5 until the April meeting. That pause matters. Transparency matters. Deliberation matters. But let’s be honest. Item 5 was not tabled because of concerns about Common Core or College and Career Readiness alignment. That question still has not been answered. And until it is, Texas parents should remain wide awake. Texas parents were promised that Common Core was rejected. If the framework remains intact under a different name, that promise was hollow. This fight is not over. It is just getting clearer. @TXSBOE @TXHilltoDieOn @MaryDunlaphome @Davy1836 @DocPeteChambers @lynnsdavenport





