Table Fox

@daniel_koss @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev I just use ibkr mobile, I know they got a million different apps on PC and web but mobile works the best 🤷🏻‍♂️ robinhood seems to be mainly for crypto and gambling

This! @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev We love you and all agree you're a generational founder and clearly have the best product team. But pleeeeease focus on building features that help users make money like access to international markets. Features that matter and increase diversification, access, etc. At the end if the day your smart users that will compound their AUM for years on your platform care about having the best tools to invest. Please stop all these degenerate gambling bs products. The world doesn't need more shitcoins and gambling.

@EndicottInvests totally agree

Sorry but $10M is PLENTY to live a free, comfortable lifestyle Insane to feel otherwise.

@Gubloinvestor @AAAmusicali Actually isn't $SIVE a customer of $POET, so this does actually affect them too, unless they change customers.

@Gubloinvestor @AAAmusicali Incredible call man, why did you choose $SIVE over $POET?

$POET is dragging $SIVEF $Sive along with it

@PepInvestStocks @charles_moshow @NATO Well somebody knows about them cause they went up 37.50% last Friday

@charles_moshow @NATO Nobody knows about $FIPP

$FIPP $NVDA $NXPI $SONY 🔥 2D Photonics What an interesting company - it receives substantial funding @NATO, has a highly experienced and well-connected management team, and taps into two key future fields: photonics and graphene.

@nexta_tv yeah cause we use our brains and apply the spirit of the law we all have free will

Germany is the only place where you can floor it and not deal with the consequences A Czech millionaire drove his Bugatti Chiron at 414 km/h on a German autobahn. In 2022, prosecutors launched an investigation but closed the case, as he was driving on a nearly empty road and did not pose a threat to others.

@Ren_aramb nothing is real about anything he says, he charges like 20k for a course but was shilling Hims and Duolingo as they continually tanked. any serious tech enthusiast would have been on twitter before 2014, let alone a 2014 AMD investor who only showed up in late 2000 due to COVID

@TableFox I think he is quite smart, just works in a different angle than most.

The whole point of picking stocks is to make money, Antonio.

@JonkooTrades I slept on this, but pissed not gonna lie. Gonna research it this weekend.

Keep sleeping on $TRT We are up 50% on dip adds from offering This has room to run, loads higher

@BiankaB12 If we could just deport them all from Europe back to Russia, that would be great.

I 1000% support russia in its quest of becoming North Korea. Fewer Sasha from Moscow type of accounts. Let them isolate themselves from the world, it would be better for everyone.

@retail_mourinho Firstly what does TA stand for and why is sentiment on X so bad, besides a failed satellite launch, which if we are honest makes no real difference when they require 25+ anyways, so that's what maybe a 4% loss in the near term. Nothing about the fundamentals has changed?

FinX sentiment on $ASTS is so bad right now, even some of the TA guys are calling for $50–60 But $ASTS has shown multiple major rallies before, with 50–100% pumps in just 2–4 weeks. This stock could still make a new ATH by May–June 😂 LONG $ASTS -RM

@michaelsikand amd the 56.6% includes CoVant management

@michaelsikand It doesn't make sense to me that Madison Dearborn Partners would own 80% of the company, that's ridiculous. They do however have 79% of the voting rights, which is quite different. Apparently they own 63.3M shares out of 111.83M outstanding shares, giving them a total of 56.6%

The $75B U.S. drone budget supercharges $AVEX. Retail finally has an asymmetrical drone stock with real traction and proven products to win a $75B pie piece. But let's understand a major risk. Specifically how $28B PE firm Madison Dearborn Partners controls 79% of the float and the lockup will expire in 6 months. One of my strengths as a content creator is making complex topics digestible, so that's my goal here. Think of it like this. One person owns 80% of the company right now. Kinda sketch? The stock is already up 80% over the IPO price. That's massive gains that this person can cash out of once the lock up expires in 6 months. IPOs are liquidity events meaning they're how you make money because you can easily sell your asset to someone else. MDP will take some profits in 6 months on a business they've been working on since 2020. That's the beauty of capitalism. We (retail) now get to own an EBITDA positive drone stock and they took the risk to give the capital to land $1.2B in DoD sole source contracts. This creates what investors call an "overhang". It's a mass of shares sitting above the market that everyone knows will eventually come up for sale, creating a psychological ceiling on the price because institutional buyers hesitate to pay when they expect cheaper paper to hit the tape soon. It's not dilution and it is not guaranteed selling of any amount, it is just the shadow of known future supply that weighs on price discovery. Now I know what you're thinking. If you were MDP, you're thinking you would rug the stock and cash out like a bandit in October. But MDP has been printing 15 to 23% annual returns for their investors since the 1990s by running clean, patient exits out of their public stocks. Dumping a big winner like $AVEX would seriously threaten the new $3B Fund XI they're raising right now and kill their reputation in IPOs. The firm has a clean rep from my initial background research. I will say 80% of the float is a lot. Most PE-backed IPOs are 30-60% The 80% does mean the unwind horizon is longer (probably 3 to 5 years instead of 18 to 24 months) of continued sales, but that also means the supply comes in smaller tranches over a longer period, which is easier for the market to absorb. Academic research also supports that the larger the equity retention the better aftermarket performance of IPOs. This is mainly because the incentives are more alligned. MDP is more likely to protect and grow shareholder value than an institution that just wants to profit fast and dump a big run back onto the market. My rebuttal for the overhang being real is the HUGE institutional and retail demand for drone industry stocks. Appetite is voracious here especially for a company with this much revenue, traction, and EBITDA positive. The budget figure today will only increase this. First off, the $AVEX IPO was oversubscribed multiple times according to Bloomberg. All the top dogs from Goldman Sachs, BofA, and Jefferies ran the book as joint lead managers, with JPMorgan, RBC, Baird, William Blair, Raymond James, Needham, and Academy Securities filling out a twelve bank syndicate. On the retail demand side look at $ONDS. No offense to you if you own the stock but I must use them as an example here. The stock has objectively weak fundamentals with only $50M in trailing revenue but it's trading near ATH even after the share count 5x'd in two years. The stock still ripped 10x because the drone bid is that voracious. If the market ate 300M net new ONDS shares on a name with no defense track record that's far more unproven than $AVEX... The idea that the same market chokes on MDP selling down a real drone prime with $503M backlog, $8B dollar pipeline on a $75B U.S. 2026 drone budget, and actual EBITDA is insane. I'll keep stress testing this. I'll look further into MDP and their dealings and check filings. $AVEX I do really like the stock. Free deep dive on my Substack with the upside I see.

@CKCapitalxx If it's true that $AVEX is being used by the Ukrainian military, then it's already over. NATO can't even defend against Russian drones and Ukraine is vastly superior. On top of that you get experience, that's worth tens of billions.

@ayceATH Appreciate the honesty man, I made a stupid trade last week and I am still processing it. You will be fine, the only thing that I've found that works is to step away for a while and distract yourself with things that make you happy 👍

tbh I’m not okay mentally but I won’t give up

@ive_m5 you need to block and report them, they are scammers that pretend to be traders and shall you over WhatsApp with their leet picks

Please stop impersonating me. I do not do shit like the person below insinuates. There is only 1 M5IVE...and I have weird underscore in my handle.

@unusual_whales Shots fired!

Pope Leo has posted a message on X, condemning those who manipulate religion for their own gain "Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth."

@YoYInvestor When will the reverse stick split affect the market, Bertie April 20th or after?

$HUBC Pay attention if you’re holding this stock: Naked shorting lets market makers sell way more “shares” than actually exist. This floods the market with extra supply and keeps the price pinned down artificially, even when people are buying. Over time, those fake shares turn into Failures to Deliver (FTDs) i.e. the seller never actually hands over real shares. When FTDs pile up for too many days, the stock hits the Reg SHO Threshold List. Rules then force the shorts/market makers to buy real shares in the open market to clean it up. No more fakes allowed. On a tiny float like $HUBC, even moderate forced buying can create huge demand with almost no real supply available. That sparks a chain reaction: price jumps → more shorts get squeezed and must cover → price jumps even harder A reverse split (the April 20 vote) often acts as the trigger because it changes the stock’s identifier (new CUSIP) and requires full share reconciliation i.e. suddenly all those phantom shares must be resolved with real buys. Result? A violent squeeze: the price can explode upward fast as the built-up pressure releases. This is what we call a coiled spring.

@retail_mourinho I think market value is closer to 50-80M

There seems to be some misinformation circulating about $HUBC having a market cap of $200k. I want to clarify that $HUBC currently has a market cap of approximately $4 million as of right now. Source: Yahoo Finance

@CKCapitalxx If Amazon already have their own satellite network and launch capability, what is the point of buying $GSAT unless it's just to have a guaranteed way to access the iPhone but $ASTS will replace all of this and provide data, so not really not sure what they are spending $12BN on😱

$ASTS was up 5% pre market on the $AMZN $GSAT news and has since given it all back and then some being down over 10% since the pre market top That is the market being irrational in real time and I want to explain why this news is actually one of the most bullish things that has happened for the entire D2D sector this year. $AMZN is acquiring $GSAT Globalstar for roughly $9 billion. Let that sink in. Globalstar does $272 million in revenue. Has a basic LEO network. Powers Apple Emergency SOS. Limited direct to device capability. The technology is miles behind $ASTS. $AMZN is paying $9 billion for the inferior version of what $ASTS has already built. This is not bearish for $ASTS. This is the most powerful sector validation imaginable. The largest e-commerce and cloud company on earth just told you that direct to device satellite connectivity is worth acquiring at any price. They looked at the competitive landscape and decided they needed a satellite network immediately regardless of cost. They picked the worst horse in the race and still paid $9 billion for it. $ASTS has 50+ carrier partners covering 3.2 billion existing subscribers. 120 Mbps speeds directly to unmodified smartphones. BlueBird 7 on the launchpad right now. $3.9 billion in cash. Fully funded constellation buildout. $GSAT has Apple Emergency SOS and a fraction of the technology. The market is selling $ASTS on news that just proved the entire thesis. Every major tech company on earth is now in a race to own D2D connectivity and $ASTS is the only pure play publicly traded company that has actually built it at scale. The pullback is a gift.