TaijhTV
12.1K posts

TaijhTV
@TaijhR
I am a crypto venture capitalist. I enjoy everything 4th industrial revolution. AGI is here and ASI is coming.


🚨🇮🇱 ISRAEL’S NEW LAW TARGETING PALESTINIANS COULD BACKFIRE Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski says the policy risks fueling anger across the Middle East. Why? It could push more people toward militant groups instead of deterring them. @karen4the6th



🚨BREAKING: Interceptions reported over Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.









UPDATE: Here's a summary of where we're at with the war: Trump wants to end it. Iran is not as keen and is trying to get better terms. The U.S. and Israel are slowly escalating by striking civilian infrastructure. Iran is responding in kind by striking Gulf infrastructure. And today, Trump made it clear again he's trying to end the war and is warning Iran that if they don't agree on his terms, the U.S. will obliterate them. I know it may not look like it, but this is good news, because Trump will just keep bombing Iran until they they concede on 'reasonable' terms.

🚨 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 WHY THE U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAN IS DOOMED How did Iran destroy over $1bn in aircraft in Saudi with drones worth tens of thousands of dollars? How are they keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed? Why are they still able to fire missiles and drones DAILY against Israel and the Gulf, with a higher hit rate? Malcolm Nance breaks down why the U.S. is so unprepared for this war, and learned nothing from the Ukraine Russia warfare He highlights a fundamental "asymmetry of tolerance": while the U.S. relies on expensive technology and has little appetite for high casualties, Iran has spent decades preparing for a war of attrition. From the massive inventory of low-cost Shaheed drones to the potential for a grueling ground insurgency, Nance warns that the U.S. lacks the depth to win a fight that will eventually come down to "rifles and knives." He suggests that Iran’s long-term play isn't just military survival, but a strategic realignment to turn Gulf allies against Washington and end American influence in the region for good. @MalcolmNance 01:00 - This war ends in blood, not strategy. 03:00 - Ukraine turned war into a real industry. 05:30 - One cheap drone can destroy billion-dollar assets. 08:30 - The battlefield just became fully automated. 13:00 - Drones vs drones is the new reality. 16:40 - The U.S. is completely unprepared for this war. 20:30 - America is still fighting the last war mindset. 25:30 - Future invasions could turn into total chaos instantly. 30:00 - This war could take years to recover from. 35:00 - Iran has no real reason to negotiate. 40:30 - Destroying infrastructure won’t break them. 45:30 - The world economy is hanging by a thread. 50:30 - This could spiral into something way bigger. 55:30 - Nobody is ready for how bad this can get.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Admiral Brad Cooper: "We are making undeniable progress in eliminating Iran's ability to project power outside its borders. We don't see their Navy sailing, and their aircraft flying. Their air defense systems have been destroyed."

TRUMP: Iran’s not putting up a good fight… they’re not even shooting at us

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Rubio lays out the administration's full case for why the U.S. struck Iran now: "We were on the verge of an Iran with so many missiles and drones that no one could do anything about their nuclear weapons program in the future. This was our last best chance." It's the clearest explanation anyone in the administration has given. And on the surface, the logic holds: Iran was building a conventional shield to protect its nuclear ambitions, and the window to stop it was closing. But it also leaves out a few things. Perhaps tactically. Iran turned down free nuclear fuel, yes. But the U.S. was also making "significant progress" in Geneva days before the strikes. The conventional shield Rubio describes was also Iran's only deterrent against exactly what's happening to them right now. And the people who decided this was the "last best chance" are the same ones who keep killing the officials Trump needs to close a deal. The question was never whether Iran's nuclear program was dangerous. It was whether this war was the only way to stop it, and whether the people pushing for it had America's interests or someone else's at the top of the list. Source: White House







