Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Taisa P Tshuma
19K posts

Taisa P Tshuma
@TaisaPT
Amazed by Grace. Author #SAR #PF1 https://t.co/7Ak3J9OvVF https://t.co/yuQdt6G7g6
Southernia, Africa Katılım Temmuz 2014
1.1K Takip Edilen530 Takipçiler

@Anunakin Afrikaner and British descendants are South African. We have no other home.
English

@Saxon_African Often l hear that they attempt to open safes looking for cash and firearms.
A number of incidents they take food from the fridges
These are mostly desperate, lazy criminals looking for easy bucks.
English

@TaisaPT So why do they often take nothing but the farmers lives
English

@Nomthan92859599 @MDNnewss Not "countries" but marginalized and isolated former colonies.
English

@eNCA Just create a Pretoria Federation 👇🏽 for southern Africa. One country with 33 federated states 👇🏽
Problem(s) solved!

English

Some countries on South Africa’s border are not very helpful in keeping their nationals from illegally crossing into South Africa. This is according to Border Management Authority Commissioner, Dr Michael Masiapato. The BMA is hoping for a more permanent solution. Tune in to #eNCA, channel #DStv403
English

Yes. It's been happening for over a century. Children and grandchildren of the immigrants now hold very important positions in government.
Man’s NOT Barry Roux@AdvoBarryRoux
Do other Africans move to Nigeria & Zimbabwe for greener pastures?
English

@HennySeibeb @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Understood. In the case of Southern Africa, the most efficient way to this is through a political union that promotes local autonomy. FEDERATION.
English

@TaisaPT @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Regional integration doesn’t mean smaller economies must submit. It means coordinated growth, mutual benefit, and shared prosperity, not South African hegemony.
English

@LetsFreeTheCape Both sides must stop quarrelling over this.
Create a Pretoria Federation 👇🏽 One country with 33 federated states 👇🏽 for Southern Africa 👇🏽
Problems solved.

English

PRESS STATEMENT: MK’s Attempts to Remove Self-Determination From Constitution Will Backfire, Says CIAG
The Cape Independence Advocacy Group (CIAG) notes with great interest the MK Party’s notice of intention to introduce a Private Member’s Bill to remove section 235, the section on self-determination, from the Constitution.
Whilst the notion of removing self-determination from the South African Constitution is legally absurd and morally repugnant, the MK’s actions may well serve a valuable purpose – to highlight the obligatory legal framework which is binding on South Africa whether it consents or not.
Self-determination is a universally recognised human right and, as a peremptory norm of international law, binding upon all states. Its purpose is to protect the rights of communities from domination – be that from colonial powers or national majorities. It is an essential element of contemporary democracy, and South Africa has signed multiple international treaties in which it has committed to honour the right.
Given the MK’s stance on wanting to replace constitutional democracy with majority rule, and its penchant for ethnic nationalism, it is unsurprising that it wishes to remove the right of self-determination. Self-determination ensures that, even were MK to command a parliamentary super-majority, something Jacob Zuma has openly proposed, minority communities would have a powerful legal remedy through which to defeat them.
What the MK’s Bill will do, however, is place on the official parliamentary record whether South Africa is truly committed to self-determination as the law demands, or whether it simply pays lip service to the right. This has significant legal implications in itself.
The CIAG has been working on legislation to operationalise section 235 for some time, with a draft Bill at an advanced stage. The MK is making the argument that since section 235 hasn’t been operationalised, it should be removed. This sets the stage perfectly to assert that the required action is not the removal of a non-derogable right, it is to make it operational.
Once MK makes its Bill public, the CIAG will make a detailed submission to Parliament.
DATE: 01 April 2026
(This is NOT an April fools joke)

English

@GutuObert "Iran is very far Zimbabwe, we would also want to know..." ,😂
English

@DJFreshSA Definitely improved it in terms of micro precision but implementation strategies have lacked consistency and coherence.
English

STIR THE POT
Three-quarters of English Premier League fans want VAR gone.
91% say it's killed goal celebrations. 94% say it's made TV viewing worse.
But the English Premier League says fans actually want to keep it?!
We're asking — has technology improved football or ruined the beautiful game?
And should the PSL still bring in VAR?
Tell us what you think. Drop a voice note on 071 460 5169
#938FreshBreakfast #StirThePot #VAR #PremierLeague #PSL
English

@HennySeibeb @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 "strengthening smaller economies" is just diplomatic jargon for "let's see what crumbs we can offer".
For SA to be globally competitive, it needs to scale up the domestic market and regional integration is the one thing also addresses other issues like labour, immigration... etc
English

@TaisaPT @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Let's talk of a model that strengthens smaller economies first — building their productive capacity, human capital, and institutional depth — creates more durable regional integration than one that simply opens markets and allows bigger economies to dominate by default.
English

@HennySeibeb @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Using that building analogy: Think of it as putting up the pillars and columns necessary to support the roof so that the partitioning walls are built while shaded.
This is an adaptive architectural design and strategy coz we are trying to address multiple challenges.
English

@TaisaPT @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Think of it as building the floors before the roof. Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho, Eswatini cannot be mere corridors for South African or Nigerian economic expansion. They must enter integration as viable, confident economies with something to contribute and something to protect.
English

@HennySeibeb @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 In the Pretoria Federation, there cannot be domination because the states are not competition but coordinated cooperation.
SA currently has 9 provinces but they have vast disparities in wealth and development, why is there no problem of "domination"?
English

@TaisaPT @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 Otherwise integration becomes annexation by another name and smaller states will rightly resist it, retreat into bilateralism, or remain perpetually dependent. The goal should be a continent of complementary strengths, not a hierarchy of dominance dressed in pan-African language.
English

@Realsoro1 @ibbosnr @NicolaWatson13 So when the Mafia moved from Italy to the US, was it because of federation?
"Importation" of social ill is a consequence of CIRCUMSTANCES not integration.
If you insist that social ill can imported through integration, the social GOOD can also be imported from you u to me.
English

Of course social ills are imported
The mafia existed in Sicily long before immigrants brought it to the US
Our culture also still values democracy, while your culture/country doesn't have it and you're more interested in a Pretoria federation
Lack of democracy would cause a civil war in South Africa
English












