Tapera ES

Listened to the debate between these two Cdes. They all presented their cases, but in the end, there is always one winner. @matinyarare won this first round. Here is why: his arguments were evidence-based and not generalised. He presented knowledge on the constitution and its clauses, along with some fundamentals. To Cde Mutisi, he must stop name-calling in his arguments and avoid generalisations. He diluted some of his good points with generalisations and meandered here and there. Otherwise, overall it was a good space. Thanks, Hulukani @Pachisolife, for organising this.

He @matinyarare mobilized 'investors' in South Africa, promising them easy deals and shortcuts. Upon arrival in Zimbabwe, they was reminded to follow procedures, including getting a ZIDA license and investor permit – easily done if papers are in order. He made his 'investors' overstay, they were arrested, and deported. Back in SA, the 'investors' asked why he misled them. That's how our relationship with him ended. He forgot even Presidents sign documents when they visit. Next time, be clear with investors – no shortcuts in Harare. All the best as you join the losers bandwagon!!!!!!!!! Via: Cde @KandishayaTaura @DeptCommsZW @VanessaMurwira @chigunwedaniel @kachikuli @AfrikenBoi @norry2020 @Chaguta7610