Tarun

Not calling today worthless. I stayed consistent: showed up, did the work on time. Check. But it felt… flat. Low effort, low mind usage, just going through motions. Not interesting, not deep. Why? Proof of what I said before: emotions → mood → mental state → productivity. Been low since the job days. Sadness lingered till today. Output dipped hard. My emotional graph/stats don’t lie — when mood tanks, even "consistent" work feels half-alive. Lesson sinking in: consistency is base, but real fire needs emotional balance. Tracking helps. Chart keeps reminding me. Small wins: at least I noticed. Anyone’s productivity tanked from lingering sadness/mood? How do you break the cycle? 👇 #EmotionalIntelligence #Productivity #MentalHealth #BuildInPublic #Consistency

It is waste of male life to optimise for free time as opposed to acquiring as much resource and power as possible. Imagine explaining this tweet to Ghengis Khan. “Don’t take more land it’s stressful! What do you need it for lol :) just sleep!” History forgets “men” like Dante.

😂

I think this article tells truth what happens right . In this world full of noise you can't figure out what you should do .but i hope this article helps you settle down the noise

Just guys i have realised bpo sector is not for me a long time ago but w8 for to complete this month i will resign this bullshit sector Peace out ✌️

Salary credit into my account salary debit from account that what is happen with most of the people . Some years Ago i heard narrative that goes with "you will own nothing but you will be happy " So any body knows about it If yes share your thoughts about it @grok what do you think about it and in your reply tag that account related to this post .

I have heard about chatgpt 5.5 . I knows it's better to have that model.but my problem is still the same need money to buy this. @grok Tell me how to solve this

Actually i want discuss why our world don't have dynamic rewards system or dynamic incentive system. For example -> let's take simple basic example related to job incentive Suppose you are working in company . You will get bonus if you exceed performance let's say 90% So every colleague of your try to cross that 90% to get bonus or incentives. But suppose some one who has performance rate of 80% so he can't see any point to get to cross 90% because he will not get bonus this month at last how much he try but performance cant be enough improve. So my idea suggest so there should be bonus acc to his past data let's say his last month performance rate is 85%. When now this month if he cross that performance rate of 85% he will get bonus not huge and not low. I think this is win win situation What do you think about guys? #bonus #incentives

@elonmusk I will show your proof. Both grok and chatgpt have same quality @grok show them reality

Not bad

Heyy! Elon Musk i thinks chatgpt and grok both have same quality i will show you proof @grok what do you think about?

@elonmusk Are you funded by Jews?

The fact that I wasn’t funded by the SPLC proves I’m not a Nazi

@ianmiles @grok what do you think about it ? Is it true about x algo?

The X algorithm is broken, and it's killing the platform from the inside out. It's gotten measurably worse, and it now barely registers something as fundamental as how many people chose to follow you. Small accounts can't grow organically. Large accounts watch their reach collapse month over month. Post too much and you're throttled. Post too little and you're forgotten. There is no winning move because the system isn't designed for anyone to win. It's designed to keep everyone anxious, posting more, and dependent on whatever the model decided that morning. I'm personally down 95% from a year ago. Ninety-five percent. I get more views and replies on Instagram with 20,000 followers than I do here with a following many multiples of that. Every serious creator, journalist, and news account I know is reporting the same collapse. This isn't a handful of cranks complaining but a structural failure visible in the numbers across the entire creator class. The damage runs deeper than impressions. The algorithm has quietly redefined what kind of person you're allowed to be on this platform. If you stay relentlessly inside one "niche," you get rewarded. If you post like an actual human being with multiple interests — politics, tech, gaming, culture, memes — you get punished. The system literally works against diversity of thought, which is supposed to be the entire point of a town square. It funnels everyone into narrower and narrower lanes until creators stop being people and start being content categories. The user experience is just as broken as the creator experience. Imagine subscribing to a dozen tech and science channels on YouTube and being shown unrelated slop instead. That's the For You feed now. Most of the accounts on my timeline are random accounts I never asked to see, while the people I actually chose to follow get buried. The "systems-first" approach the team is so proud of has turned a social network into a slot machine and the engagement numbers everyone is whispering about in group chats prove the experiment isn't working. Here's the part nobody at X seems willing to say out loud: followers used to be social capital, and the algorithm has retroactively devalued every account on the platform. All of us, aside from the legacy celebrities who arrived with audiences pre-built, clawed our way up from zero. We posted through the woke years, the bot waves, the policy changes, the verification chaos. We built something. And then one day a model decided our followers don't really count anymore. Treating creators this way is the digital equivalent of how communist regimes treat entrepreneurs: confiscate the value they built, redistribute it to whoever the central planner prefers this week, and call it fairness. It also makes no business sense. Creators are not a cost center on this platform — we are the platform. The reason anyone opens the app is because someone they want to hear from is here. When you suppress that signal in favor of algorithmic guesses, you don't just hurt creators — you train users to leave. People are already migrating their best work to Substack, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, where follower relationships still mean something. X is speedrunning the same mistake every dying platform makes: confusing engagement metrics with actual loyalty. The fix isn't complicated: Give us back a real Following feed that respects the explicit choice users made when they hit the follow button. Let the For You tab handle discovery — that's its job — but stop overriding the social graph people built deliberately. Make follower count weight something meaningful again. Stop punishing topical range. Stop boosting unverified randoms over accounts users have actively opted into. And stop pretending an opaque ranking model is more legitimate than the user's own stated preferences. X is supposed to be the free speech platform. But suppression by algorithm is still suppression — it just has better PR. If the team is serious about this being a town square, the people who showed up and built it deserve to actually be heard by the audiences they earned. Fix the algorithm. Give followers back their meaning. Let creators be human again.

@Raynerdtech Amazing marketing strategy but LoL 😂

Using your competitor’s name but spelt backward is crazy

@pcshipp Literally me

Claude: You've used 90% of session limit Me instantly:

Literally today's match is intresting who will win PBKS or Delhi Capitals. I am literally amazed by PBKS batting Tell me in comment Who will win #PBKS #DelhiCapitals

I think sometimes i show uninterested in life as i want to told you about my Trip still pending you have to w8 for it Till then Tell me about your trip story

Heyy! Guys i was on trip .that was amazing I will tell you the whole story of trip in the next post So stay tuned. 🗻🗻🗻

@hthieblot 👩‍❤️‍👨

pitch me your company in 1 word.

Saw so many beautiful girls today… One after another, each one hit harder than the last 😭 No end in sight… my neck was spinning zoooooooooo Then I stopped, looked into their eyes and realized — Every single girl is beautiful in her own way. Even the guys got that unique charm 🔥 Beauty has NO finish line bro. Stop comparing. Just choose what YOU vibe with — the smile, the energy, the laugh, whatever pulls you in ❤️ There’s no “most beautiful.” There’s only the one that feels RIGHT to you. Drop a 🔥 if this hit different #BeautyInEveryOne #NoComparison #ChooseYourVibe #RealBeauty #PositiveVibesOnly #ViralThoughts

Most people think getting rich is the hard part. Wrong. **Staying rich** is the real skill — and it’s built on **fear**. Sequoia Capital’s Michael Moritz was asked why his firm survived decades while others died. His answer: “We’ve always been afraid of going out of business.” **Only the paranoid survive.** That same fear mindset separates those who build wealth from those who keep it. Meet Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, and Rick Guerin. Three equally brilliant investors who started together. Buffett and Munger? Never in a hurry. Patient. No leverage. Rick Guerin? Smart as them — but rushed to get rich fast. He used heavy margin loans. Then came the brutal 1973-74 crash. Markets crashed ~70%. Margin calls destroyed Rick. He was forced to sell his Berkshire Hathaway shares **to Warren Buffett at under $40 each**. Those same shares later became worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. Same talent. Same starting line. **Completely different endings.** Lesson from *The Psychology of Money* by @morganhousel: Getting wealthy = Speed + Risk + Optimism Staying wealthy = Patience + Paranoia + Survival Don’t rush. Stay scared of losing it all. That fear keeps you in the game long enough for compounding to work its magic. Which mindset are you building? 👇 #PsychologyOfMoney #WealthMindset #Buffett #Munger #RickGuerin #GettingRichVsStayingRich #MoneyLessons #InvestingPsychology