TeaCider
328 posts


@footballontnt Didn't klopp reach 3 UCL finals with liverpool 2017/2018, 2018/2019, 2022/2023
English

@FTLOB98 @LouSirr101 They weren't, they were £20 for season ticket holders in 2023 and £22 in 2018.
No idea what the situation was in 1988.
English

@LouSirr101 Didn’t they used to be for play-off games? Can’t remember now.
English

Season ticket holders should've had the ticket free
🏴 🇬🇧@boroloony
Sorry,but cba with non season ticket holders moaning about prices for the play offs.Always the same whinging when it comes to a big game 🥱Cant keep everyone happy and yeh the prices might seem high,but you don’t have to buy them. Season ticket holders deserve their discount.
English

@MitchellT27 Sorry, it's character limits on here, I can't post all my thoughts, I'd just include that in a list of losing money.
We've made more money than we've lost, but our squad has weaknesses because so many of
our attackers struggle, and those that don't are sold before we benefit.
English

@MitchellT27 We spent £750,000 on Edmundson who'd be available for a free in 6 months, whilst selling Matt Clarke for less at a loss.
I'd be shocked if we didn't lose money on Edmundson.
Clarke was a good signing, blighted by injury, but the Edmundson saga was a damaging waste of money.
English

@TeaCider24 Okay we're going in circles and I'm failing to see your point in the context of the tweet you responded to tbh.
English

@MitchellT27 That's not free money, we sold him at a loss.
He also wouldn't have gone for free if we'd activated his 1 year option.
English

@TeaCider24 Because he wanted to leave and would've gone on a free 18 games later.
English

@MitchellT27 How's it free money?
We signed him for £2.25 million.
English

@TeaCider24 I just said I agree Edmunson was a bad signing.
Clarke being sold was free money.
We should've just loaned someone else but we panicked because Ipswich forced our hand.
English

@MitchellT27 He didn't need to be sold, we had an option.
He'd been great in the previous season under Carrick, we had Edmundson on loan.
The second Ipswich recalled him, we should have left it.
We sold Clarke for £500,000 and spent £750,000 on a bad player who available for free in 6 months
English

@TeaCider24 Clarke had to be sold. He didnt fit neither Carrick or Hellberg's style and he wanted to leave. He had 6 months left. Good sale for good money.
Edmunson was a bad signinf but at least it was cheap.
I haven't mentioned most failures that coat us under half a million.
English

@MatthewMS94 @TheAthleticFC Never understood the logic of it from a Wolves perspective.
They can't have expected him to keep you up, there was zero benefit to bringing him in early in the season, he was always going to be tainted with relegation.
Then you look at his actual record in the last few years.
English

@TeaCider24 @TheAthleticFC He's absolutely wank, can't believe we paid you actual money for this anti-football clueless charlatan 🤦♂️
English

Five league games ago, Rob Edwards' standing as Wolverhampton Wanderers head coach seemed relatively high after delivering wins against Aston Villa and Liverpool for a soon-to-be relegated team.
He ended Saturday being called a 'w****r' by home supporters at Molineux after going straight down the tunnel at full-time, having already been booed and insulted for a second-half substitution.
The question for Wolves is: do they stick or twist before they return to the Championship next season?
@SteveMadeley78
🔗 nytimes.com/athletic/72488…

English

@SkySportsPL Ludicrous decision by VAR to let that stand.
An absolutely blatant dive.
English

@RustyRL @TheAthleticFC I hate him, not going to pretend otherwise, but I don't think there's any way of spinning his time at Wolves as successful.
People treat it like he came in at the end of the season, he's been in charge for 70% of it.
I got my maths wrong though, they've conceded less.
English

@SkySportsPL Not sure you can you rescue a point in the 54th minute against a team that had been down to 10 men since the 24th minute.
English

@grassrootsrefJa @DaleJohnsonBBC Yes, it still is baffling.
That two people could watch that and argue that it's not violent conduct because he doesn't pull his head back enough before he headbutts is baffling.
Just reinforces the sad lesson from that incident, players have to dive or it'll be overlooked.
English

@TeaCider24 @DaleJohnsonBBC It's not baffling if you read their reasons
English

Arsenal's Gabriel should have got a red card for violent conduct against Man City - Premier League KMI Panel.
But also ruled it didn't reach the threshold for a VAR review.
Plus, unanimously said no Dogso red for Abdukodir Khusanov on Kai Havertz.
👇
bbc.co.uk/sport/football…
English

@grassrootsrefJa @DaleJohnsonBBC A clear headbutt should always be seen as brutality.
The fact 2 of them disagreed is baffling.
English

@TeaCider24 @DaleJohnsonBBC Explain how their judgment was wrong within the laws of the game.
English

@grassrootsrefJa @DaleJohnsonBBC He clearly headbutted him.
If the bar is so high that it's below that, it's not fit for purpose.
It's just further proof that the panel's judgement can't be trusted that 2 of them disagreed it was violent conduct in the first place.
English

@TeaCider24 @DaleJohnsonBBC It's not nonsense, it's just that fans don't understand the high bar and you're ignoring that the onfield vote was 3-2 so that is further proof it wasn't a clear and obvious error
English

@grassrootsrefJa @DaleJohnsonBBC If it should have been a red card for violent conduct , VAR absolutely should have intervened.
No two ways about it.
It's nonsense like this that's leading to a total lack of faith in VAR.
English

@TeaCider24 @DaleJohnsonBBC It's ok to accept that other opinions than your are valid and it doesn't have to mean that opinions other than yours are wrong or part of some kind of conspiracy.
English








