Sabitlenmiş Tweet
:D
18.8K posts

:D
@Testarossa_F110
25 / possible NSFW / NB (puppything) / I like cars and tech :3 / assigned Dutch at birth... :/
Katılım Ekim 2012
1.6K Takip Edilen329 Takipçiler

@imminentdestiny cosmetics. it can surely do a little bit but, 1) this car doesn't need it and 2) wings create downforce at the bottom side of the wing profile so blocking some of that with the mounting posts show you its nothing but looks and thus really fucking cringe. big L. soo ugly lmaoooooo
English
:D retweetledi

@_Tom_Henderson_ expected that after the Division Heartland news but... wtf ;c
English

After speaking with sources at Ubisoft, Red Storm Entertainment was supporting approximately 10 projects across Ubisoft in various capacities before today's news.
Insider Gaming@InsiderGamingIG
Ubisoft Closes Down Game Development at Red Storm Entertainment With 105 Jobs Lost insider-gaming.com/red-storm-ente…
English

@IanCutress that was the one point I made, because I could defend it less, but also because it links to some thing I hope you'd know!^^ but yes; their control of the market, the lack of ram, AI bubble blowing and use of this software tech to but hamper/limit the industry is anti-technology.
English

@Testarossa_F110 NVIDIA is anti technology? Quick someone tell Jensen
English

"Hey, here's a demo that's still early and unoptimized, coming out end of year hopefully. We're still getting it to work and this is an early alpha."
"We shoved it onto two separate GPUs to ensure the base game runs fine and the DLSS works well enough for the demo."
"We have 5090s, so why not run it on those. We could have used two GT730s for the lolz, and you would have asked why, but we had 5090s on the desk."
Everyone starts screaming
🎶OMG 🎶
🎶 IT REQUIRES 🎶
🎶 TWO 5090s!!1!🎶
🎶 WONT SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN 🎶
I really can't fathom the dumb. You know console games are made on dev kits that are vastly faster than the consoles they run on. It's well documented, especially in early cycle design.
To anyone that claims I'm pro NVIDIA or I'm not taking people's complaints seriously, go look at my previous NVIDIA tweets. I don't get passes for events. I find issues with their messaging all the time. This is just one where seemingly most of the TechTube space couldn't be bothered to apply the most basic critical thinking, or didn't ask a basic question or two. Instead, let's jump straight to drama and have it as the cornerstone of the outrage and content. Because clicks, I guess.
There are a thousand other things to mention about DLSS5. I gave them a ton of feedback when I spoke to the engineers at the demo in person (most of the time it looks like a repositioning of the light source more than anything else, it was shown on games that aren't that high in graphics fidelity (I'm actually disappointed in modern AAA if this is what we have), half the time it looks simply like the additional tesselation we saw in DX11, and it can ignore a number of doubly-relected shadows).
Here's the kicker though. NVIDIA has thousands of employees working on its gaming portfolio. I've seen so many people complain 'why did they work on this when they could have worked on other stuff'. They ARE working on other stuff. You might be able to only think about one feature at a time (make sure you remember to breathe), but these things are all developed in parallel with other features. If anyone has enough money to have teams invested in researching and developing a bucket load of features, it's NVIDIA.
Also, you can turn the feature off. Imagine complaining about a TV channel you don't watch, just because it's on the guide and the cable service promoted it and needed two 8K TVs to do so because it was early 3D.
I'll say it again. I really can't fathom the dumb. Or rather I can, and I'm just amazingly disappointed on this hardware critique. I'll get backlash from other media just for this post, sure, that much is certain (and thanks for obliging, much appreciated). But perhaps I should just bring @ctnzr on the show for an interview later in the year. He's a really cool dude anyway.
Rhiannon@Rhianno25594476
@IanCutress And yet NVIDIA themselves showed it required two 5090's and could only generate slop AI filter garbage.
English

@Jazzy_ggxx @HardwareUnboxed @PauzaDeJoaca @nothere_now @IanCutress he was reacting to the statement; "made possible with software breakthroughs rather than more powerful hardware." while it requires a LOT more powerful hardware than the avg gamer is running. like how.... ugh- nvm, youre likely a bot anyway.
English

his point is a non point, its a tech demo, they are a company that produces tech. If it can't run well now, then that is a problem with the tech currently. But future cards could do better. If you don't like the look, dont use it. Plus it's a tool, you could use it many different ways. Steve is largely just emotionally against it and is using post hoc reasoning to hate it. Its like hating Raytracing defacto because it has a performance hit. You take it for what it is, but generative/processed AI like this can make it so that games have lots of different styles. And considering it a tool/toy, is what reasonable people should look at as. Instead he is emotionally charged about it and looking for justifications to hate it.
English

You came to the show and saw the demo in person, right?
GamersNexus@GamersNexus
@TheEggman64 > rather than more powerful hardware > look inside > 2x 5090s to run
English

Am I tripping or is Ollie missing
clara@leclercsletters
the drivers' opening title for f1 kids 😭
English

@TheReal_EzraA @f1trollofficial oh omg yh, ig they both made it out alive sobbbbbbbb
English

@Testarossa_F110 @f1trollofficial Was actually thinking of Ricciardo but that’s even better
English















