Sabitlenmiş Tweet
psychiatrist.com/pcc/growing-ev…
So apparently you can just treat """long covid""" with SSRIs
What does this mean?
English
thad abanana
3.1K posts
thad abanana
@ThaddeusPlunk
Interesting. Have yuo considered being a good oerson?
Katılım Ağustos 2025
59 Takip Edilen25 Takipçiler
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin By your standards so is literally everyone who has ever existed retard
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @chakravartiiin You’re admitting that china is evil if that is the threshold lmao what a f a g g o t
English
> Number one enemy humiliated
> Oil flowing back to domestic industries
> All dealings in hormuz now in yuan
Do Nothing
WIN.
BRICS News@BRICSinfo
JUST IN: 🇨🇳🇮🇷 China pushed Iran to seek ceasefire with the US, AP reports.
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Your threshold for "CHINA EVIL" would include literally every single government that has ever existed lmfao. You're a braindead retard
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @chakravartiiin They did not just arrest them lmao you fucking shill
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Well the US firebombed an entire block of houses in Philadelphia
the CCP arrested student protestors
but yeah CHINA EVIL you brainwashed mongoloid
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @chakravartiiin So you admit it is evil lol fucking mongrel
English
@1zaidazane lol having casual sex with friends isn't bad, but don't pretend like it's some revolutionary praxis
English
sex with friends builds camaraderie and it was a corner stone of revolutionary praxis in the 60s and 70s. not without issues of course because the revolutionaries were still wildly misogynistic.
Mizu 愛@POISON18
I’ve been reading The Ethical Slut and I think I’m going to change my stance on having sex with friends.
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Lol ur only example is from 40 years ago?
The US firebombed civilian protestors 40 years ago too, retard
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Lol what peaceful protestors are you even talking about?
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @chakravartiiin Absolutely insane to call peaceful protesters terrorists lol when we did that everyone dragged us but I guess China gets special treatment
English
@KurtEClothier @CHRISF0GLE Every single right involves the action of others, and therefore only exists under laws.
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE unfortunately, that seems true. but it's more so that without law, people just trample over our human rights because a lot of people are generally terrible.
but any right which involves the action of someone else (instead of the inaction) can only exist under laws.
English
What IS a human right, by this logic? Not food, water, or shelter, at least in modern-day society. Seriously, what doesn’t require the labor of others?
edelnougat 🐿️@edelnougat
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Ohhhh only the US is allowed to have terrorists. Everyone else just has politican dissidents.
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @chakravartiiin Terrorists?! It isn’t a whataboutism if the topic is fuckin china being good lmao. The point is they are not
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin You're doing a "whataboutism" by bringing up China killing their ""political dissidents"" aka terrorists
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin The post is literally about Israel you retard
English
@heyitst0m @CHRISF0GLE Oh cool glad everybody can have walking sticks. Healthcare, jobs, and dignity would have been cool but hey! A stick!
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE Obviously I can’t just claim property rights wherever I damn well please but if I find a stick in the woods and whittle into a walking stick - yes that becomes my property and I have a right to keep and protect it.
English
@HarperSanchez9 @chakravartiiin Oh yeah your "But their housing market might maybe collapse because I want it to really bad! and also they kill political dissidents!" was a really well-made point that's worthy of debating
English
@Jessie48178643 @CHRISF0GLE My point is that the argument "Only negative rights are rights because they are inalienable!" is a false statement and doesn't adequately prove that positive rights don't exist
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE you could also look at it like-
rights are concepts that the system that recognizes them concedes are intrinsically not under its authority to act in any way that would impede those the rights are guaranteed to from keeping
English
@anon526327 @jlrizzoii @rk__upadhya The most effective tool would be a negative parking rate. Pay people to park.
English
@jlrizzoii @rk__upadhya The govt has a lot of tools to coerce them if it wants to. Capping fees, higher taxes, eminent domain, etc.
English
for those who don't know: in 2008, Chicago sold their entire parking meter system to the UAE for 75 years, for a one-time payment of $1.1B.
would be great to see a movement there to rip up the deal....or just completely smash up the parking meter system
Luke Metro@luke_metro
Iran should sell securitized future toll revenue from the Strait of Hormuz just like Chicago did with their parking meters
English
@sarvou @CHRISF0GLE The point is the fact that the right needs to be codified proves it is not inalienable
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE Amendments are only legal rights but they are not natural inalienable rights.
The Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights shouldn't exist because it makes it sound like the only rights you have are the ones written in The Bill of Rights.
English
@sarvou @CHRISF0GLE My point is that your logic is selective and flawed. You can't pick and choose.
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE I don't even think you have a right to healthcare.
But let's say legally, you have the right to healthcare constitutionally then yes it would simply have been denied no removed.
This doesn't mean I think it shouldn't be cheaper and more acceptable though
English
@sarvou @CHRISF0GLE The fact that the amendment exists at all proves that it is not inalienable
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE For them to erase your rights, they would need to erase the first amendment
English
@sarvou @CHRISF0GLE "not been removed simply been denied"
Ok then by that logic, somebody denied medical treatment for being unable to pay didn't have that right removed, they simply had it denied
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE If you were to kill someone, theyre right to life has not been removed it has simply been denied. As per the nature of what it means to exist as a human
Compared to a legal context where you can literaly just erase a right by signing a document, then it literally stops existing
English
@sarvou @CHRISF0GLE What do you mean "cannot be destroyed"? It sure as shit can. Ever heard of a gun?
English
@ThaddeusPlunk @CHRISF0GLE This is not true.
Compare inalienable rights to legal rights. For example, one is extrinsic and cannot be destroyed. Meanwhile, legal rights can be destroyed by simply removing them from their legal contacts or erasing them in a legal setting.
English
thad abanana retweetledi
uncritical support to the barista. i do this on purpose to stop people trying to make me decide for them when no matter what you make they will have an issue bc its, surprise, not what they actually wanted. order the vanilla latte and keep it pushing next time
English