TheBenchmark.x

30.4K posts

TheBenchmark.x banner
TheBenchmark.x

TheBenchmark.x

@thebenchmark_x

VISIONARY | Curating Premium Decentralized | Web3 | Blockchain Names for the Programmable Money Era. UD|FN|FIO

Katılım Ekim 2021
3.4K Takip Edilen3.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TheBenchmark.x
TheBenchmark.x@thebenchmark_x·
D E S I D E R A T A
TheBenchmark.x tweet media
Español
7
13
67
14.1K
TheBenchmark.x retweetledi
Freename
Freename@freename·
Freename AI waitlist is open. The AI-powered platform built for founders who want to own their digital identity and build a business around it, without the chaos of juggling 10 different tools. Join the waitlist now and get 75 free credits at launch. Link below.
Freename tweet media
English
5
4
18
456
Unstoppable Domains
Unstoppable Domains@unstoppableweb·
What's the best site you've built with AI Site Builder so far?
English
14
2
22
1.8K
D a z
D a z@Authentic369·
Are we in a new Era of Ascension into the 5th Dimension. Or….. In a Perpetual state of DOOM & Potential Armageddon ? Thoughts 🤔
English
19
1
28
1.2K
TheBenchmark.x
TheBenchmark.x@thebenchmark_x·
Electromagnetic chart last few days has been playing up.....
TheBenchmark.x tweet media
English
1
0
2
52
Skywatch Signal
Skywatch Signal@UAPWatchers·
🚨Skyquakes Are Being Recorded Worldwide and There Is Still No Identifiable Source This has moved way past random anecdotal reports. There is now a consistent body of recorded data showing atmospheric shockwaves that are occurring without any detectable origin. In January 2024, central Alabama experienced a measured pressure spike of 38 pascals. The event triggered emergency calls across multiple counties within roughly 90 seconds. People reported a single concussive blast that shook structures across a wide area. Monitoring systems recorded the pressure wave clearly. What they didn't manage to record though was any source of origin. There was no aircraft on radar, no explosion on seismic systems, and no thermal signature on satellite imaging which is weird. The physics behind a shockwave isn't complicated and looking into how they occur will help you better understand why this is so strange. Air only behaves like that when energy is forced into it faster than it can dissipate. Under normal conditions, that requires an explosion, a supersonic object, or a rapid thermal expansion event such as lightning. None of those things were present at the time of recording data. There were no storm cells, no lightning strikes within range, and no temperature spike that would indicate rapid heating of the air column. The waveform itself also creates a huge problem for conventional explanations. These events last between 2 and 8 seconds, which is longer than typical thunder and doesn't match the short, defined profile of a sonic boom. A supersonic aircraft produces a distinct double pressure signature that resolves quickly. These recordings don't match that structure. Flight data confirms there were no aircraft exceeding Mach 1 in the affected airspace during multiple events. Seismic coupling can be removed from the equation as well. If ground movement is strong enough to generate an audible airwave, it registers on instruments. In these cases, there is no measurable ground displacement. Sensors within close range show nothing beyond background noise. There is no precursor tremor and no follow up activity. The energy is present in the air but not in the ground, which removes tectonic processes from the equation. Meteor airbursts do provide the correct mechanism in terms of compressing air into a shock front, but they also leave clear evidence. High speed entry produces heat, plasma trails, and visible signatures that are tracked across multiple systems. These skyquake events show none of that though. The measured energy is significantly lower than known airburst events, yet there is still no thermal or visual confirmation. Acoustic triangulation often places the source below ten kilometers, which does not line up with typical meteor disintegration altitudes. Atmospheric ducting is often suggested as a way to explain how distant explosions might be heard locally. The issue with that is the signal structure and the localization because these events arrive as sharp, singular impulses and are reported within a pretty tight geographic radius. There are no corresponding explosions recorded within the distances required for ducting to be a viable expalnation. The wavefront geometry indicates a local origin rather than a distant one. Military activity is another common explanation. Explosions or high speed vehicles can obviously produce pressure waves in the recorded range. Global monitoring systems are designed to detect those events across multiple channels. In most skyquake cases, there is no matching signal across seismic, acoustic, or radiation networks. Flight tracking data also does not show vehicles operating at speeds required to produce the observed waveforms. The absence of cross system confirmation removes most known forms of testing from consideration. Upper atmospheric electrical events also don't fit due to air density limitations. At the altitudes where phenomena like sprites occur, the air is too thin to transmit a strong shockwave to the ground. The recorded sound levels require denser air at lower altitudes. There is also no accompanying electromagnetic spike detected during these events. Mechanical explanations such as gas pipeline failures can be excluded in many cases due to the lack of physical evidence. There are no fires, no debris, and no pressure drops recorded in infrastructure systems. Many events occur in locations where no such infrastructure even exists. Infrasound networks have logged over 1,200 of these events between 2010 and 2024. The pressure amplitudes typically range from 10 to 50 pascals, with frequencies below 20 hertz. These are not marginal readings. The signals are clear enough to be triangulated. Many sources are placed between one and five kilometers in altitude with reasonable accuracy. Satellite systems consistently show no corresponding thermal or kinetic activity at those times. The current situation is certainly not a lack of data, we have plenty of that. There is a lack of a mechanism that explains all of the observed parameters at once though. Each proposed explanation accounts for part of the behavior but fails when applied across the full dataset. That is why this mystery remains unresolved. The measurements are consistent and the locations repeat. The physical models do not fully match what is being recorded. What do you think they could be? #Skyquakes #AtmosphericAnomalies #Infrasound #UAP #Science
Skywatch Signal tweet media
English
61
115
503
23.3K
Stefan Burns
Stefan Burns@StefanBurnsGeo·
This large Earth-facing coronal hole is pretty gnarly. Engage your imagination! What's everyone seeing?
Stefan Burns tweet media
English
406
101
800
32.5K
TheBenchmark.x retweetledi
Brady
Brady@ntropiq·
Behold our new and improved recent sales & listings feed We now ensure privacy on sales by requiring that seller opt-in. Use your discretion around the buyer's desires, too Head on down to the bottom of your account settings to opt-in 😉 unstoppabledomains.com/account/settin…
Brady tweet media
English
5
11
41
2.4K
TheBenchmark.x retweetledi
135.x
135.x@135dotx·
My 🆕est @UnstoppableWeb #domains: 🙀 omg.agi 🤓 prodigy.agi 👼🏻 progeny.agi 🪜 climb.agi 💎  gemma.agi 🦫 busybeaver.agi 🍆 edgelord.agi 🧟‍♂️ longpig.agi 🦉 grandis.agi 😎 vibing.agi 🪙 goldmine.agi 🏆 goldenrule.agi #UDfam #Onchain #Web3 #NFT #CryptoTwitter #DNS
GIF
Eesti
0
2
6
298
`
`@ick_real·
I'm looking for a ridiculously old-fashioned girl's name for our new born . Think great-grandma name. Very old and rare. Any suggestions asap pls?
English
33.5K
784
22.1K
6.9M
TheBenchmark.x retweetledi
Freename
Freename@freename·
The ones who own the internet didn't stumble into it. They planted when others were still watching. Your turn, hun. 2 week lefts on 50% off
Freename tweet media
English
0
3
12
236
TheBenchmark.x
TheBenchmark.x@thebenchmark_x·
Pot kettle black thing......
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞@justinsuntron

这是"世界暴政", 不是"世界自由金融" 此提案被包装成"治理对齐信号"和"长期承诺",但剥开包装来看,这是我见过的最荒谬的治理骗局之一。我逐条说明。 一、反对即受罚——经典的胁迫手段 这不是一次合法的投票,而是胁迫,这个提案的设计本身就是一个逻辑陷阱:任何投反对票的人,其代币将被无限期锁定,没有任何解锁路径。 换句话说,你反对这个提案,你就被惩罚。这不叫投票,这叫胁迫。世界上哪有一种民主程序是同意就给你好处、反对就关你禁闭的? 二、投票者已被选择性冻结 我个人持有约4%的投票权,但我的代币已被冻结,我被强制排除在投票过程之外。 我并非个例。 大量持有重大投票权的持有人都处于同样的状态。与此同时,团队掌握着冻结代币的权力——他们决定谁能投票、谁不能投票。这意味着什么?意味着在投票开始之前,结果就已经被决定了。 这不是治理投票。这是一场警察已经封锁了议会大门、只放自己人进去举手的表演。投票池已经被清洗过了,剩下的只有同意票。 这种投票的结果没有任何约束力。 三、全部实际权力被匿名者窃取 WLFI智能合约的实际控制权掌握在一个3/5匿名多签手中,而一个匿名的guardian EOA则拥有将持有WLFI的地址列入黑名单的权力。 请注意——是匿名的。 这个匿名多签可以无视任何投票结果,直接在合约层面执行任何操作。所谓的治理提案、链上投票、社区讨论,统统不过是一场戏。真正的权力从未被交给任何其他人,而他们试图用这些把戏来愚弄社区,简直可笑。 事实是:权力掌握在没有人知道、也无法验证其所有者身份的匿名钱包地址手中。这不是去中心化治理,这是披着DAO外衣的独裁。 四、投票者必须实名,统治者却匿名——比暴政还过分 最讽刺的部分在于:WLFI要求每一个参与投票的持有人完成身份验证、电子签署确认、满足合规资格要求。你想行使自己的权利?请先亮出身份。 但真正掌握合约生杀大权的guardian和多签签名者是谁?没有人被告知,完全没有透明度。被统治者必须实名,而拥有绝对权力的统治者却是匿名的。你的选民要登记造册、接受审查、被审核资格、被指示如何投票——而你的独裁者连脸都不露。 五、数十亿美元财产权利的赤裸侵犯 让我们不要忘记这个提案的真实利害:这不是一个无关痛痒的参数调整或协议升级。这个投票要决定的是高达数十亿美元资产的解锁时间表、治理与归属权的重新分配,以及最极端的——数十亿枚代币的永久销毁。这是对持有人财产权利赤裸裸的剥夺。 在一个投反对票就被惩罚、大量持有人被冻结投票权、实际控制权在匿名钱包手中的环境下,用这样一场伪投票来决定数十亿美元资产的命运? 这不是治理,这是一场骗局,完全背离了这个协议的初衷。任何法治社会都不会允许这种事情发生。在传统金融市场中,任何涉及这种规模的资产处置,都需要经过严格的监管审查、独立董事会批准和少数股东保护程序。 而在这里,几个匿名钱包就可以决定一切。代币的永久销毁意味着持有人的财产被不可逆地消灭——没有赔偿,没有追索权,没有任何正当程序。这已经远远超出了所谓"去中心化治理"的范畴,这是对财产权的系统性侵犯。 结论 我重申,这个提案是非法治理。这是少数被筛选出来的人在行使权力,精心策划一场进一步的权力巩固和财产掠夺行动。 反对者因投反对票而受罚,异见者被冻结,实际控制权在匿名钱包手中,行使权利的人必须自证身份,而数十亿美元资产的命运就这样被一场伪投票裁决。 这不是去中心化金融应有的样子。在这种条件下产生的结果不具备合法性,不应具有约束力,不应被承认。 我呼吁所有WLFI持有人认清这个提案的本质,在所有公开渠道表达反对,并保留一切法律追诉权利。

English
0
0
0
21
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the Director of Token Holder Experience at World Liberty Financial. The dashboard has 13 columns now. The 13th is called Unlock. We published a governance proposal. It covers 62 billion locked tokens. In plain English: the team that locked your tokens is asking you to vote on whether the team gets to unlock theirs. There are two groups. Investors — the wallets that sent real money. The team — founders, advisors, partners. The wallets that didn't. Investors paid starting at $0.015 per token. 17 billion tokens. Real money from real accounts. 18 months ago. They cannot sell. Cannot transfer. Cannot earn staking rewards. The tokens are $0.08 now. Down 83%. The proposal gives investors a 2-year cliff and a 2-year vest. That is 4 more years of waiting for something they already bought. They keep all their tokens. We are calling this "full retention." The team received 45 billion tokens for free. The proposal gives the team a 2-year cliff and a 3-year vest. We burn 10%. That is 4.5 billion tokens. At current prices, $360 million. We paid nothing for them. We could not sell them. We are burning 10% of an asset we got for free and could not move. We are calling this "sacrifice." We keep the other 90%. $3.2 billion. We are calling that "alignment." The team holds 73% of the locked supply. Investors hold 27%. The people who paid nothing outnumber the people who paid everything nearly 3 to 1. The vote requires a 1 billion token quorum. Simple majority. In the last governance vote, 76% of the voting power came from 10 wallets. Several of those wallets are ours. The team will vote on whether the team unlocks. The team will pass it. That is governance. The proposal says 77% of locked holders have never voted. We wrote that as a problem. The 77% did not vote because the 10 wallets decide everything. We built the system that made their votes meaningless. Now we are using their silence to justify our exit. If you do not opt in within 10 days of the vote passing, your tokens stay locked indefinitely. Accept the schedule we wrote or keep nothing. The proposal calls this "community-driven." We listed our achievements to prove we earned it. USD1 stablecoin. OCC national bank charter application. Chainlink Proof of Reserves. AgentPay SDK. The stablecoin is the one where the President's family collects 75 cents of every dollar. All of it was built with investor money. The team built value with your capital, then asked your permission to extract it. The vote we will win with our own tokens. 600,000 wallets have been checking every morning for the word "unlock." It appeared. It does not mean what they think it means. The distance between "locked indefinitely" and "locked for 2 more years, then vested over 2 more" is not freedom. It is a countdown that the captors set. Column 13 updates in real time. Every column goes in the same direction. These events are unrelated. I am still the reason they are unrelated.
Peter Girnus 🦅 tweet media
English
145
182
826
102.8K